123XE 123CS EC DECAY 1981MA01,1981SO06 21NDS 202105
123XE H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 174, 1 (2021)$CUT=15-Apr-2021$
123XE DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3a (10-Sep-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
123XE c 1981Ma01: {+123}Cs source was produced via {+139}La(p,3p14n) with
123XE2c E=600 MeV proton provided by the CERN synchro-cyclotron and separated
123XE3c by the ISOLDE separator. Separated ions were implanted into an
123XE4c aluminum-coated mylar tape. |g rays were detected with Ge(Li)
123XE5c detectors and conversion electrons were detected with a Si(Li)
123XE6c detector; positrons were detected with a 4|p|b plastic scintillator.
123XE7c Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |g(t), E(ce), I(ce), |g-ce-coin, E|b{++},
123XE8c I|b{++}, |g-|b{++}-coin. Deduced levels, J, |p, parent T{-1/2}, decay
123XE9c branching ratios, log {Ift} values, conversion coefficients, |g-ray
123XEac multipolarities. Systematics of odd-mass Xe nuclei. Comparisons with
123XEbc theoretical calculations.
123XE c 1981So06: {+123}Cs source was produced via {+124}Xe(p,2n) with E=33 MeV
123XE2c proton beam provided by the McGill synchro-cyclotron on {+124}Xe gas
123XE3c target. |g rays were detected with Ge(Li) (with a positron annihilator
123XE4c of Cu) and an x-ray detectors. Measured E|g, I|g, E(x ray), I(x ray),
123XE5c |g|g-coin, E|b{++}, I|b{++}. Deduced level, J, |p, parent T{-1/2},
123XE6c Q-value, log {Ift}, conversion coefficients, |g-ray multipolarities.
123XE c 1987Fr10: {+123}Cs source was produced by irradiation of a cerium
123XE2c target by 270 MeV {+3}He beam and separated by the ISOCELE separator at
123XE3c Orsay. |g rays were detected with a plastic scintillator and conversion
123XE4c electrons were detected with a magnetic spectrometer. Measured E|g,
123XE5c I|g, E(ce), I(ce), |g-ce-coin, |g-ce(t). Deduced T{-1/2}, conversion
123XE6c coefficients, |g-ray multipolarities, transition strengths. Comparisons
123XE7c with theoretical calculations.
123XE c 1975We23: {+123}Cs source was produced via La(p,spallation) with 600
123XE2c MeV proton beam provided from the CERN Synchro-cyclotron. |g rays and
123XE3c positrons were detected with a combination of Ge(Li) and plastic
123XE4c scintillator, respectively, or a combination of NaI(Tl) and Si(Li)
123XE5c detectors. Measured E|g, I|g, E|b{++}, I|b{++}, |b{++}-|g-coin. Deduced
123XE6c decay energies, Q-value.
123XE c 1966Da09: {+123}Cs source was produced via In({+14}N,xn) reaction with
123XE2c E=140 MeV {+14}N beam provided by the Yale Heavy Ion Accelerator on a
123XE3c natural indium target. |g rays were detected with a Ge(Li) detector and
123XE4c a NaI crystal and positrons were detected with a plastic phosphor.
123XE5c Measured E|g, I|g, E(x ray), I(x ray), E|b{++}, I|b{++}, |g|g-coin,
123XE6c |b|g-coin, |b|g(t). Deduced levels, J, |p, parent T{-1/2}, |b{++}-decay
123XE7c branchings, log {Ift}, |g-ray conversion coefficients.
123XE c Others:
123XE c 1996Os04, measured Q-value=4110 {I30} 1975LyZY,
123XE c 1980KaZB: measured I(ce). Deduced J, |g-ray multipolarity
123XE c 1977KoYL: La(p,spallation) E=635 MeV. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g(t).
123XE c 1975LyZY: measured I(ce). Deduced levels, J, |p.
123XE d 1979CrZX is superseded by 1981So06
123XE c Decay scheme is that proposed by 1981Ma01 and 1981So06 on the basis of
123XE2c E|g sums and |g|g-coin. There are major differences in the two level
123XE3c schemes. The level scheme is incomplete due to a large gap of about 3
123XE4c MeV between Q-value and the highest populated level at 1453.
123XE cE $I(|e+|b{++}) and log {Ift} values should be considered as approximate
123XE2cE since the decay scheme is incomplete.
123XE cE TI$From |g+ce intensity balance at each level, unless otherwise noted.
123XE2cE The quoted values should be considered as approximate due to incomplete
123XE3cE decay scheme. Large discrepancies exist between values from 1981Ma01
123XE4cE and 1981So06. See detailed comments at branches.
123XE cG $I(K x rays)/I|g(97|g)=1.6 {I3} (1981Ma01)
123XE cG $|a(K)exp values given under comments are from 1981Ma01, normalized to
123XE2cG |a(K)(theory) for the 322.4 E2 transition in {+120}Cs decay.
123XE cG E,RI$From 1981Ma01, unless otherwise noted. I|g values from 1981Ma01
123XE2cG relative to I|g=1000 for 97.3|g have been re-normalized by the
123XE3cG evaluator relative to I|g=100 for 97.3|g. Weighted average is taken
123XE4cG where comparable values are also available in 1981So06. The intensity
123XE5cG values for weak |g rays are quite different between 1981Ma01 and
123XE6cG 1981So06
123XE cG E(B),RI(B)$From 1981So06
123XE cG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas. Values from this study are deduced based on
123XE2cG ce data given under comments and they are also given under comments if
123XE3cG different from adopted values.
123XE cL E$From a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies.
123XE cL J,T$From Adopted Levels. Values from this study are adopted in
123XE2cL Adopted Levels where noted, or given in comments if different.
123XE cL J(X)$(1/2,3/2) proposed in 1981Ma01 and/or 1981So06 based on log {Ift}
123XE2cL values, which however should be considered as approximate due to
123XE3cL incomplete decay scheme.
123CS P 0.0 1/2(+) 5.86 M 10 4205 15
123CS cP J,T$From Adopted Levels of {+123}Cs
123CS cP QP$From 2021Wa16
123XE N 0.205 22 1.0 1.00
123XE cN NR$From |SI(|g+ce to g.s.)=100-%I(|e+|b{++})(g.s.), with the latter=33%
123XE2cN {I7} from 1981Ma01. This normalization should be considered as
123XE3cN approximate due to incomplete decay scheme.
123XE PN 3
123XE G 191.5 2 0.6 1
123XE2 G %IG=0.122 25
123XE G 234.2 3 0.45 5
123XE2 G %IG=0.092 14
123XE G 286.1 2 0.8 1
123XE2 G %IG=0.16 3
123XE G 294.5 2 1.0 6
123XE2 G %IG=0.20 13
123XE cG E$other: 294.5 {I5} (1981So06)
123XE cG RI$unweighted average of 0.4 {I1} from 1981Ma01 and 1.6 {I4} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 353.5 2 0.5 1
123XE2 G %IG=0.102 23
123XE G 361.4 2 1.1 2
123XE2 G %IG=0.22 5
123XE G 447.1 3 0.5 1
123XE2 G %IG=0.102 23
123XE G 484.7 2 2.9 4
123XE2 G %IG=0.59 11
123XE G 553.1 3 0.3 1
123XE2 G %IG=0.061 22
123XE G 573.6 4 1.0 3
123XE2 G %IG=0.20 7
123XE G 626.7 3 0.5 1
123XE2 G %IG=0.102 23
123XE G 635.8 3 0.3 1
123XE2 G %IG=0.061 22
123XE G 723.1 3 0.5 1
123XE2 G %IG=0.102 23
123XE G 1189.0 5 1.6 4
123XE2 G %IG=0.33 9
123XE G 1255.8 4 1.6 5 B
123XE2 G %IG=0.33 11
123XE L 0.0 1/2(+) 2.050 H 14
123XE E 26 6 7.0 15 5.5 1 33 7
123XES E EAV=1444.5 70$CK=0.1822 21$CL=0.0242 3$CM+=0.00657 8
123XE cE TI$from 1981Ma01, deduced from total |g+ce feedings to ground state
123XE2cE and total number of positrons with tabulated data of capture
123XE3cE to |b{++} ratios of allowed decays (1971Go40). This value should be
123XE4cE considered as approximate because of incomplete decay scheme and also
123XE5cE because of assumptions of capture to |b{++} ratios. Others: 62 {I14}
123XE6cE (1981So06), |?74 {I3} (1966Da09); see comments for the feeding to 97.4
123XE7cE level.
123XE L 97.38 3 3/2(+) 380 PS 30
123XE cL T$adopted value from ce-|g-coin in 1987Fr10. Other: <9 ns (1966Da09)
123XE E 14.5 19 4.3 6 5.7 1 18.8 24
123XES E EAV=1399.0 70$CK=0.1959 23$CL=0.0260 3$CM+=0.00707 8
123XE cE E$E|b+=2.99|*10{+3} {I31} (in coincidence with 100|g) (1975We23).
123XE cE TI$others: 26 {I3} from 1966Da09, determined by correlating, through
123XE2cE the radioactive decay parent-grand-daughter relationships, the yield of
123XE3cE the 97-keV transition and the total yield of the well-studied isobaric
123XE4cE grand-daughter {+123}I with appropriate corrections for known
123XE5cE fluorescence yields and theoretical K/L ratio; 1966Da09 then
123XE6cE tentatively assign the rest 74% {I3} to the g.s. feeding, without
123XE7cE considering possible feedings to higher-energy excited states which are
123XE8cE proposed in later studies but not in 1966Da09. A value of 12.5 {I6}
123XE9cE is reported in 1981So06, based on their measured total positron
123XEacE intensity of 650 {I100} relative to I|g=100 for 97.4|g and |g+ce
123XEbcE feedings to 97.4 level, with their measured |a(K)exp=0.9 {I1} for
123XEccE 97.4|g; based on this branching to 97.4 level and total |g+ce feedings
123XEdcE to ground state, 1981So06 deduce 62% {I14} branching to g.s.
123XE cE $Measured K-capture to positron ratio=0.505 {I40} (1966Da09)
123XE G 97.38 3 100 M1 0.885 C
123XE2 G %IG=20.5 22
123XES G KC=0.760 11$LC=0.1003 14$MC=0.0204 3
123XES G NC=0.00422 6$OC=0.000526 8
123XE cG E$weighted average of 97.3 {I1} from 1981Ma01 and 97.39 {I3} from
123XE2cG 1981So06. Other: 100 {I1} (1975We23)
123XE cG M$supported by ce(K)/ce(L+M+N)=6.8 {I7} (1987Fr10), |a(K)exp=0.9 {I1}
123XE2cG (1981So06), |a(K)exp=0.74 {I15}, |a(L)exp=0.13 {I4}, |a(M)exp=0.029
123XE3cG {I10} (1981Ma01), |a(K)exp=0.80 {I2} (1966Da09). |d(E2/M1)<0.2
123XE4cG calculated using BrIccMixing based on all ce data above.
123XE L 180.75 4 5/2(+) 2.5 NS 2 X
123XE cL T$adopted value from ce-|g-coin in 1987Fr10.
123XE E 3.8 8 1.2 2 6.3 1 5.0 10
123XES E EAV=1360.1 70$CK=0.2086 24$CL=0.0277 4$CM+=0.00753 9
123XE G 83.38 2 20.4 12M1 1.380 C
123XE2 G %IG=4.2 5
123XES G KC=1.184 17$LC=0.1567 22$MC=0.0319 5
123XES G NC=0.00659 10$OC=0.000821 12
123XE cG E$weighted average of 83.3 {I1} from 1981Ma01 and 83.38 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 18.0 {I20} from 1981Ma01 and 21 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG M$supported by ce(K)/ce(L+M+N)=7.2 {I8} (1987Fr10), |a(K)exp=1.30 {I6}
123XE2cG (1981So06), |a(K)exp=1.3 {I3}, |a(L)exp=0.22 {I6}, |a(M)=0.033 {I8}
123XE3cG (1981Ma01). |d(E2/M1)<0.17 calculated using BrIccMixing based on all ce
123XE4cG data above.
123XE G 180.64 14 3.0 3 E2 0.228 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.61 9
123XES G KC=0.178 3$LC=0.0400 6$MC=0.00840 12
123XES G NC=0.001684 25$OC=0.000183 3
123XE cG E$unweighted average of 180.5 {I1} from 1981Ma01 and 180.77 {I3} from
123XE2cG 1981So06. Other: 177 {I1} (1975We23)
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 2.8 {I5} from 1981Ma01 and 3.1 {I3} from
123XE2cG 1981So06.
123XE cG M$|a(K)exp=0.17 {I4} (1981Ma01) and ce(K)(97.4|g)/ce(K)(180.6|g)=30
123XE2cG {I10} (1987Fr10) give M1,E2 (1981Ma01)
123XE L 252.01 5(7/2+) X
123XE E 0.7 3 0.2 1 7.0 2 0.9 4
123XES E EAV=1327.0 70$CK=0.220 3$CL=0.0293 4$CM+=0.00795 10
123XE G 71.26 3 1.7 5 (M1+E2) -0.02 5 2.17 4 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.35 11
123XES G KC=1.86 3$LC=0.248 10$MC=0.0504 21
123XES G NC=0.0104 4$OC=0.00130 4
123XE cG E$weighted average of 71.5 {I3} from 1981Ma01 and 71.26 {I3} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$unweighted average of 2.2 {I4} from 1981Ma01 and 1.2 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 252.0 5 2.2 6 B ?
123XE2 G %IG=0.44 13
123XE cG E,RI$this quoted intensity from Table IV of 1981So06 is inconsistent
123XE2cG I(252|g)/I(71|g)=0.23/0.41 in Fig.11. Also, this |g is seen neither by
123XE3cG 1981Ma01 and in other studies. So the placement of this |g is
123XE4cG considered as questionable by the evaluator and is not included in
123XE5cG Adopted Gammas.
123XE L 307.11 7 5/2(+) X
123XE E 1.1 4 0.40 16 6.7 2 1.5 6
123XES E EAV=1301.4 70$CK=0.230 3$CL=0.0305 4$CM+=0.00829 10
123XE G 209.6 2 0.9 1 E2,M1 0.121 16 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.18 3
123XES G KC=0.100 10$LC=0.017 6$MC=0.0035 12
123XES G NC=0.00072 23$OC=8.3E-5 21
123XE cG E$weighted average of 209.5 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 209.7 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 0.9 {I1} from 1981Ma01 and 0.7 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.14 {I6} (1981Ma01)
123XE G 307.1 1 20.2 16E2 0.0388 C
123XE2 G %IG=4.1 6
123XES G KC=0.0320 5$LC=0.00542 8$MC=0.001121 16
123XES G NC=0.000228 4$OC=2.62E-5 4
123XE cG E$weighted average of 307.0 {I1} from 1981Ma01 and 307.1 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06. Other: 306 {I1} (1975We23)
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 17.0 {I20} from 1981Ma01 and 21 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG M$|a(K)exp=0.037 {I6}, |a(L)exp=0.005 {I2} (1981Ma01) give M1,E2.
123XE L 437.48 21 7/2(+) X
123XE E 0.21 8 0.09 3 7.3 2 0.30 11
123XES E EAV=1240.9 70$CK=0.254 3$CL=0.0338 4$CM+=0.00917 11
123XE G 340.1 2 1.4 2 E2 0.0281 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.29 5
123XES G KC=0.0233 4$LC=0.00380 6$MC=0.000785 11
123XES G NC=0.0001595 23$OC=1.85E-5 3
123XE G 437.2 2 1.7 3 ? ?
123XE2 G %IG=0.35 8
123XE cG E$seen and placed only by 1981Ma01, with J(437)=(1/2,3/2). But the
123XE2cG adopted J|p(437)=7/2(+) would require Mult=M3 for this transition to
123XE3cG 1/2(+) ground state, which is very unlikely since it would require an
123XE4cG isomeric T{-1/2}>2 ms for the 437 level in order for B(M3)(W.u.) not to
123XE5cG exceed RUL=10. So this placement is considered as questionable by
123XE6cG the evaluator and this |g is not included in Adopted Gammas.
123XE L 442.58 9(1/2+,3/2+)
123XE E 2.3 4 0.98 18 6.3 1 3.3 6
123XES E EAV=1238.6 70$CK=0.255 3$CL=0.0339 4$CM+=0.00921 11
123XE G 261.8 1 11.3 18M1,E2 0.062 4 C
123XE2 G %IG=2.3 5
123XES G KC=0.0516 17$LC=0.0081 16$MC=0.0017 4
123XES G NC=0.00034 7$OC=4.0E-5 6
123XE cG E$weighted average of 261.7 {I1} from 1981Ma01 and 261.9 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$unweighted average of 9.5 {I10} from 1981Ma01 and 13 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.050 {I8}, |a(L)exp=0.006 {I2} (1981Ma01).
123XE G 345.3 2 1.1 2 ?
123XE2 G %IG=0.22 5
123XE G 442.6 2 2.9 4
123XE2 G %IG=0.59 11
123XE L 585.75 12(3/2+)
123XE E 0.56 9 0.28 5 6.8 1 0.84 14
123XES E EAV=1172.3 70$CK=0.285 4$CL=0.0379 5$CM+=0.01030 13
123XE G 333.7 2 1.0 2 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.20 5
123XE G 405.0 2 1.6 3 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.33 7
123XE cG $1981So06 place a |g of E=405.0 {I5} from the 848 level, with I|g=1.1
123XE2cG {I2}. See comments for that |g
123XE G 488.4 2 1.5 3 ?
123XE2 G %IG=0.31 7
123XE L 596.60 9(1/2+,3/2+)
123XE E 8.3 11 4.2 6 5.6 1 12.5 17
123XES E EAV=1167.3 70$CK=0.287 4$CL=0.0383 5$CM+=0.01039 13
123XE cE E$E|b+=2.37|*10{+3} {I14} (1981So06), 2.54|*10{+3} {I26} (1975We23),
123XE2cE in coincidence with 597|g .
123XE G 344.5 5 3.4 9 B ?
123XE2 G %IG=0.69 20
123XE cG E$could be the same as 345.3|g, placed from 442 level in 1981Ma01 and
123XE2cG other studies. This placement by 1981So06 is considered as questionable
123XE3cG by the evaluator and is not included in Adopted Gammas
123XE G 499.2 2 6.2 8 E2,M1 0.0101 11 C
123XE2 G %IG=1.26 21
123XES G KC=0.0086 11$LC=0.00116 6$MC=0.000237 11
123XES G NC=4.88E-5 25$OC=6.0E-6 5
123XE cG E$weighted average of 499.3 {I1} from 1981Ma01 and 498.9 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 6.2 {I8} from 1981Ma01 and 6 {I2} from 1981So06
123XE cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.007 {I3} (1981Ma01).
123XE G 596.6 1 55 5 M1,E2 0.0064 9 C
123XE2 G %IG=11.2 15
123XES G KC=0.0055 8$LC=0.00072 7$MC=0.000147 13
123XES G NC=3.0E-5 3$OC=3.7E-6 4
123XE cG E$weighted average of 596.7 {I1} from 1981Ma01 and 596.4 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06. Other: 598 {I1} (1975We23)
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 45 {I6} from 1981Ma01 and 57 {I3} from 1981So06
123XE cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.006 {I2} (1981Ma01).
123XE L 611.09 8(1/2+,3/2+)
123XE E 3.0 5 1.6 2 6.1 1 4.6 7
123XES E EAV=1160.6 70$CK=0.291 4$CL=0.0387 5$CM+=0.01051 13
123XE cE E$E|b+=2.79|*10{+3} {I41} (1975We23), in coincidence with 611|g .
123XE G 304.0 1 3.4 8 M1,E2 0.0397 7 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.69 18
123XES G KC=0.0335 7$LC=0.0050 7$MC=0.00102 14
123XES G NC=0.00021 3$OC=2.50E-5 22
123XE cG E$from 1981So06. Other: 304.0 {I2} (1981Ma01)
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 3.0 {I5} from 1981Ma01 and 5 {I1} from 1981So06
123XE cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.033 {I10} (1981Ma01).
123XE G 430.5 2 1.0 2 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.20 5
123XE cG E$weighted average of 430.6 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 430.0 {I5} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 1.1 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 0.8 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 513.6 4 7.0 AP
123XE2 G %IG=1.4 8
123XE cG RI$Masked by the strong 511-keV line. I|g estimated from ce spectrum by
123XE2cG assuming mult=M1,E2 (1981Ma01).
123XE G 611.1 2 15.4 19 C
123XE2 G %IG=3.1 5
123XE cG E$weighted average of 611.2 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 610.9 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06. Other: 612 {I1} (1975We23)
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 14.0 {I20} from 1981Ma01 and 16.7 {I19} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE L 693.74 17(1/2,3/2)
123XE E 0.73 13 0.42 8 6.6 1 1.15 21
123XES E EAV=1122.5 70$CK=0.310 4$CL=0.0413 5$CM+=0.01121 14
123XE G 693.8 2 6.0 8 C
123XE2 G %IG=1.22 21
123XE cG E$weighted average of 693.8 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 693.6 {I4} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 5.7 {I8} from 1981Ma01 and 8 {I2} from 1981So06
123XE L 741.47 6(1/2+,3/2+)
123XE E 3.8 6 2.3 4 5.9 1 6.1 10
123XES E EAV=1100.5 69$CK=0.322 4$CL=0.0429 5$CM+=0.01164 14
123XE cE E$E|b+=2.5|*10{+3} {I10} (1975We23), in coincidence with 742|g .
123XE G 130.3 2 0.40 6 [M1,E2] 0.55 17
123XE2 G %IG=0.081 15
123XES G KC=0.43 10$LC=0.10 6$MC=0.021 12
123XES G NC=0.0042 24$OC=0.00045 23
123XE G 434.3 1 4.7 6 M1,E2 0.0146 13 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.96 16
123XES G KC=0.0125 12$LC=0.00172 3$MC=0.000350 5
123XES G NC=7.20E-5 13$OC=8.8E-6 4
123XE cG E$other: 434.3 {I2} (1981So06)
123XE cG RI$other: 4.7 {I7} (1981So06)
123XE cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.014 {I5} (1981Ma01).
123XE G 644.1 1 12.5 25 C
123XE2 G %IG=2.5 6
123XE cG E$weighted average of 644.2 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 644.1 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06. Other: 645 {I1} (1975We23)
123XE cG RI$unweighted average of 10.0 {I15} from 1981Ma01 and 15 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 741.5 1 15.0 20 C
123XE2 G %IG=3.1 5
123XE cG E$from 1981So06. Other: 741.5 {I2} (1981Ma01), 743 {I1} (1975We23)
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 13.0 {I20} from 1981Ma01 and 17 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE L 848.42 11(1/2+,3/2)
123XE E 1.8 4 1.2 2 6.1 1 3.0 6
123XES E EAV=1051.4 69$CK=0.350 4$CL=0.0466 6$CM+=0.01266 15
123XE G 154.8 3 0.3 1 [M1,E2] 0.31 8 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.061 22
123XES G KC=0.25 5$LC=0.051 24$MC=0.011 6
123XES G NC=0.0021 10$OC=0.00024 10
123XE G 237.6 3 1.3 9 [M1,E2] 0.083 8 ?
123XE2 G %IG=0.26 19
123XES G KC=0.069 4$LC=0.011 3$MC=0.0023 6
123XES G NC=0.00047 12$OC=5.5E-5 11
123XE cG E$weighted average of 237.4 {I3} from 1981Ma01 and 238.0 {I5} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$unweighted average of 0.45 {I5} from 1981Ma01 and 2.2 {I6} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 251.8 2 0.38 4 [M1,E2] 0.069 5 ?
123XE2 G %IG=0.077 12
123XES G KC=0.0578 25$LC=0.0092 20$MC=0.0019 5
123XES G NC=0.00038 9$OC=4.5E-5 8
123XE G 405.0 5 1.1 2 BC ?
123XE2 G %IG=0.22 5
123XE cG $Placed by 1981So06, listed as seen in coincidence with 261.8|g in
123XE2cG Table V. But a peak at this energy is barely seen in the coincidence
123XE3cG spectrum of 261.8|g in Fig.8 of 1981So06. 1981Ma01 place a |g of
123XE4cG E=405.0 {I2} from the 586 level with I|g=1.6, and this |g is listed as
123XE5cG seen in coincidence with 83.4|g and 97.4|g, but not with 261.8|g.
123XE6cG 2001Ga25 in {+123}Te({+3}He,3n|g) also place a 405.1|g from the 586
123XE7cG level but not from the 848 level. So the placement by 1981So06 is
123XE8cG considered as questionable (by the evaluator) and this |g could be
123XE9cG the same |g seen from 586 level in 1981Ma01 and 2001Ga25.
123XE G 541.0 5 2.9 11 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.59 23
123XE cG E$unweighted average of 541.5 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 540.5 {I5} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$unweighted average of 1.8 {I3} from 1981Ma01 and 4 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 667.8 2 5.8 13 C
123XE2 G %IG=1.2 3
123XE cG E$weighted average of 667.9 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 667.6 {I4} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$unweighted average of 4.5 {I7} from 1981Ma01 and 7 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 750.8 2 3.9 3 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.79 11
123XE cG E$weighted average of 750.9 {I3} from 1981Ma01 and 750.7 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 3.5 {I5} from 1981Ma01 and 4.8 {I7} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 849.0 5 0.8 2
123XE2 G %IG=0.16 5
123XE cG E$weighted average of 848.9 {I5} from 1981Ma01 and 849.0 {I5} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 0.8 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 0.7 {I4} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE L 917.42 21(3/2+)
123XE G 610.3 2 1.3 4 BC
123XE2 G %IG=0.26 9
123XE E 0.15 5 0.12 4 7.1 2 0.27 9
123XES E EAV=1019.7 69$CK=0.369 5$CL=0.0492 6$CM+=0.01336 16
123XE L 1032.37 24(1/2+,3/2)
123XE E 0.29 6 0.26 6 6.7 1 0.55 12
123XES E EAV=967.1 69$CK=0.403 5$CL=0.0538 7$CM+=0.01460 17
123XE G 422.0 5 0.7 3 B
123XE2 G %IG=0.14 7
123XE G 725.1 3 1.0 2 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.20 5
123XE cG E$weighted average of 725.1 {I3} from 1981Ma01 and 725.0 {I5} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 0.9 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 1.3 {I3} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 934.7 5 1.0 3 ?
123XE2 G %IG=0.20 7
123XE L 1125.73 19(1/2+,3/2)
123XE E 0.79 15 0.81 15 6.2 1 1.6 3
123XES E EAV=924.5 69$CK=0.432 5$CL=0.0577 7$CM+=0.01568 18
123XE G 278.0 5 1.1 4 B
123XE2 G %IG=0.22 9
123XE cG E,RI$other: a 278.3 {I3} with I|g=0.25 {I5} not placed in 1981Ma01
123XE G 819.0 5 1.2 6 BC
123XE2 G %IG=0.24 13
123XE G 945.0 3 1.9 5 BC
123XE2 G %IG=0.39 11
123XE G 1125.3 3 3.7 3 B
123XE2 G %IG=0.75 10
123XE L 1273.2818(1/2,3/2)
123XE E 2.1 5 2.6 6 5.7 1 4.7 11
123XES E EAV=857.5 68$CK=0.482 6$CL=0.0644 7$CM+=0.01749 19
123XE G 1176.2 4 9 4 B
123XE2 G %IG=1.8 9
123XE G 1273.2 2 14 2 B
123XE2 G %IG=2.9 5
123XE L 1452.84 14(1/2,3/2)
123XE E 0.65 15 1.1 3 6.0 1 1.8 4
123XES E EAV=776.2 68$CK=0.545 6$CL=0.0730 8$CM+=0.01983 20
123XE G 711.2 2 3.0 10 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.61 22
123XE cG E$weighted average of 711.4 {I2} from 1981Ma01 and 711.0 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$unweighted average of 2.0 {I3} from 1981Ma01 and 4 {I1} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 841.8 2 1.6 3 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.33 7
123XE cG E$weighted average of 841.9 {I4} from 1981Ma01 and 841.8 {I2} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 1.5 {I3} from 1981Ma01 and 1.8 {I5} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE G 1355.9 5 3.3 8 C
123XE2 G %IG=0.67 18
123XE cG E$weighted average of 1356.2 {I5} from 1981Ma01 and 1355.6 {I5} from
123XE2cG 1981So06
123XE cG RI$weighted average of 3.0 {I8} from 1981Ma01 and 5 {I2} from 1981So06
123XE G 1453.0 5 1.1 5 B
123XE2 G %IG=0.22 11