111RU 111TC B- DECAY 1998PF01 09NDS 200905
111RU H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jean Blachot$CIT=NDS 110, 1239 (2009)$CUT=1-Feb-2008$
111RU c The experiment was performed using on-line mass separation
111RU2c of products of proton-induced fission of uranium
111RU3c at the IGISOL facility in Jyvaskyla. The mass separated
111RU4c beam was collected on a tape. Long-lived activities
111RU5c were removed at regular intervals. The collection
111RU6c point was viewed by a |DE-E plastic telescope for the detection
111RU7c of |b-particles and two Ge-detectors. The |b-|g and
111RU8c |g-|g coincidence events were recorded. Since {+111}Tc has
111RU9c Q(|b{+-})={ 7.48 MeV {I8}}, the highest value of the separated
111RUac A=111 isobars, |g rays were assigned to its decay by gating
111RUbc on the high-energy part of the |b-spectrum.
111RUCC Preliminary data on 111TC B- decay were given by 1992PEZX and 1988PE13.
111TC P 0.0 (7/2+,9/2+) 290 MS 20 7450 80
111TC cP T$from ENSDF for {+111}Tc
111RU N 0.337 15 1.0 1.0
111RU cN NR$from |S(I(|g+ce) of |g's to g.s.)=99.15, assuming no |b feeding
111RU2cN to {+111}Ru g.s.(estimated from Z-dependence of isobaric yields);
111RU3cN %|b{+-}n={ 0.85 {I20}}
111RU PN 3
111RU G 76 1 0.07 3
111RU cG $Possibly from an 11/2- level in {+111}Ru
111RU G 413.8 5 2.0 7
111RU cG $Possibly in coin with 104|g
111RU L 0.0 (5/2+)
111RU L 150.2915 (7/2+)
111RU cL T${ 3.1 ns {I8}} for complex, levels 150, 213 and 317
111RU B 22 2 5.1
111RUS B EAV=3323 39
111RU G 150.2 2 93 6 M1 0.101 C
111RUS G KC=0.088 3$LC=0.0106 4$MC=0.00193 6$NC+=0.00037 1
111RU L 213.2 3 (9/2+)
111RU cL T${ 3.1 ns {I8}} for complex, levels 150, 213 and 317
111RU G 63.0 3 3.0 4 M1+E2 5.8 25
111RU2 G ECC=5.8 23
111RU cG $|a(exp) from intensity balance
111RUS G KC=2.9 20$LC=0.9 8$MC=0.17 15$NC+=0.028 24
111RU G 212.8 7 1.0 5
111RU L 279.7020
111RU B 13 2 5.3
111RUS B EAV=3262 39
111RU G 279.7 2 37 5
111RU L 317.2 3 (9/2) 4.4 NS 12
111RU B 4.9 5 5.7
111RUS B EAV=3244 39
111RU G 103.9 3 13.4 17 D C
111RU G 166.9 3 3.0 6 D C
111RU L 355.8925 7.8 NS 21 ?
111RU B 2.4 3 6.0 ?
111RUS B EAV=3225 39
111RU G 205.6 2 7.2 8 C ?
111RU L 368.8016 (5/2+,7/2+,9/2+) 7.2 NS 16
111RU B 36 2 4.8
111RU cB IB$38 in figure 1 of 1998Pf01 seems a misprint
111RUS B EAV=3219 39
111RU G 218.5 2 5.8 6 C
111RU G 368.8 2 100 4 M1,E2
111RU CG M$from T
111RU cG RI$uncertainty of 42 in table 1 of 1998Pf01 seems a misprint
111RU L 489.8 4 6.1 NS 13
111RU B 0.7 1 6.5
111RUS B EAV=3161 39
111RU G 172.6 3 2.0 4 C
111RU L 542.6818
111RU B 8.1 11 5.4
111RUS B EAV=3136 39
111RU G 392.1 3 2.8 5 ?
111RU G 542.8 2 21 3
111RU L 571.0 3
111RU B 2.6 9 5.9
111RUS B EAV=3122 39
111RU G 571.0 3 7.7 24
111RU L 766.8 8 ?
111RU B 0.6 2 6.5 ?
111RUS B EAV=3028 39
111RU G 616.5 7 1.7 5 ? ?
111RU L 824.6 7 ?
111RU B 0.4 1 6.6 ?
111RUS B EAV=3001 39
111RU G 674.3 6 1.2 4 ? ?
111RU L 863.5 6 ?
111RU B 1.0 2 6.2 ?
111RUS B EAV=2982 39
111RU G 713.2 5 2.9 7 ? ?
111RU L 1026.3 4
111RU B 3.2 7 5.7
111RUS B EAV=2904 39
111RU G 1026.3 4 9.5 20
111RU L 1048.5 6 ?
111RU B 0.50 25 6.3 ?
111RUS B EAV=2880 39
111RU G 898.2 5 1.5 7 ? ?
111RU L 1435.2 5
111RU B 5.1 2 5.3
111RUS B EAV=2709 39
111RU G 1435.2 5 15 4