111AG 111PD B- DECAY (23.4 M) 1977KR14,1969BE11,1969SC1209NDS 200905
111AG H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jean Blachot$CIT=NDS 110, 1239 (2009)$CUT=1-Feb-2008$
111AG c 1987Ze04 propose two levels at 568.5 and 568.8 instead of 568.8
111AG2c based on coincidence
111AG c Measured: |g, |g|g(1977Kr14, 1969Be11, 1969Sc12)
111AG cG E,RI$E|g, I|g are from 1977Kr14, unless otherwise indicated
111AG cG E(A),RI(A)$From 1969Be11
111AG cG E(B)$From 1977Kr14 (5.5-h {+111}Pd decay)
111AG cG RI(D)$From branching in ({+3}He,pn|g), one expects I|g(509|g from
111AG2cG 568.5)=24 {I13}, and I|g(509|g from 568.8)=23 {I7}, nearly twice the
111AG3cG observed intensity
111AG CL BAND(F) (K=1/2(431)) BAND IN ANALOGY WITH SIMILAR CONFIGURATIONS
111AG2cL populated in {+107}In-{+119}In. A=18.7, a=-1.5 calc from
111AG3cL 1/2,3/2,7/2 E(levels). Other interpretation given by 1977Gl06.
111PD P 0.0 5/2+ 23.4 M 2 2217 11
111AG N 0.0087 7 1.0 1.0 1.0
111AG cN NR if no direct |b{+-} feeding to {+111}Ag g.s. and if
111AG2cN %|b{+-}=0.7 for 59.8 level ({+111}Ag)
111AG PN 0.0087 7
111AG G 414 1 3 1
111AG G 1246 1 0.4 2 A
111AG G 1348 2 2 1
111AG G 1395 1 0.5 3 A
111AG G 1549 1 0.6 3 A
111AG G 1863.2 100.3 2 A
111AG L 0.0 1/2- 7.45 D 1
111AG cL T$from 7.45 d {i1} (1960Ba49), 7.450 d {i17} (1974Ro18)
111AG2 L %B-=100
111AG L 59.87 77/2+ 64.8 S 8 M1
111AG2 L %IT=99.3$ %B-=0.7 2
111AG cL E$from I|g(245|g,{+111}Cd)/I|g(580|g)=0.58 {i4} (1977Kr14)
111AG B 95.3 4 5.85 5
111AGS B EAV= 852 23$
111AG cB E$2130 {i50} (1957Kn38) s. Others: 2150 {i100} (1952Mc34), 2100 {i100}
111AG2cB (1960Pr07)
111AG cB IB$using I|g(59.8|g)=63 {i5}(1969Be11) gives I|b=95.3 {i4};
111AG2cB other I|g(59.8|g)=43 {i5}(1977Kr14) would give I|b=95.1
111AG G 59.82 8 63 5 E3 181
111AGS G KC= 42.9 $LC= 114.6 $MC= 23.56 $NC+= 4.23 $
111AG cG RI$from 1969Be11. Others: 43 {i5} (1977Kr14), 79 {i21} (1969Sc12)
111AG cG M$from L1/L2/L3=7.0 {i15}/100/130 {i2}, K/L=0.64 {i20} (1978Sh08)
111AG2cG HF(E3,59.8|g)=21 W.u.
111AG L 130.29 99/2+ 1.22 NS 2
111AG cL T$from |b(ce(K) 70|g)(t): 1976Sv04
111AG G 70.43 8 90 3 M1+(E2) 0.12 LE 1.18 197 5
111AGS G KC= 1.030 $LC= 0.1410 $MC= 0.0268 $NC+=0.00531 $
111AG cG RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a. Others: 80 {i5} (1969Be11), 106 {i21}
111AG2cG (1969Sc12), 50 {i8} (1977Kr14).
111AG3cG |d|<0.12 deduced by 1976Sv04 from L-subshell ratios
111AG cG TI$from an intensity balance at the 130 level.
111AG L 289.76103/2-
111AG G 289.8 1 12.2 9 [M1] 0.024
111AGS G KC=0.02076 $LC=0.00250 $MC=0.00047 $
111AG L 376.66 73/2+ 16 NS 1 F
111AG cL T$from 1977Gl06 (377|g)(t);
111AG2cL branching: I|g(377|g)/I|g(317|g)/I|g(87|g)=100/4.2/3.33 (1977Gl06)
111AG B 0.18 8.3
111AGS B EAV= 708 23$
111AG G 87.0 1.8 [E1] 0.22
111AGS G KC= 0.2078 $LC= 0.0255 $MC=0.00479 $NC+=0.00091 $
111AG cG E,RI$from 1977Gl06
111AG G 316.8 2 2.4 3 [E2] 0.026
111AGS G KC=0.02216 $LC=0.00312 $MC=0.00060 $NC+=0.00012 $
111AG cG RI$av of 2.2 (1977Gl06), 3.2 {i4} (1977Kr14), 1.8 {i2}
111AG2cG (1969Be11), 2.6 {i4} (1969Sc12)
111AG G 376.68 8 53 3 [E1] 0.004
111AGS G KC=0.00354 $LC=0.00041 $
111AG L 391.20105/2-
111AG B 0.027 AP 9.1 AP
111AGS B EAV= 701 23$
111AG G 101.4 7 0.6 3
111AG G 391.2 1 3.1 1
111AG L 404.77161/2+ F
111AG G 404.8 2 10.0 6
111AG L 545.8414 7/2+ F
111AG B 0.08 AP 8.5 AP
111AGS B EAV= 632 23$
111AG G 169.4 2 4.0 17
111AG G 415.5 3 8.8 3 B
111AG cG RI$av of: 10 {i2} (1969Be11), 7 {i2} (1969Sc12), <15 (1977Kr14)
111AG G 485.8 2 3.1 6
111AG L 568.5 2 5/2+
111AG B 0.05 8.2
111AGS B EAV= 622 23
111AG G 279.0 2 1.2 4
111AG cG E$the placement of this |g and the two levels (568.5,568.8) are
111AG2cG based on coincidence work of 1987Ze04 in ({+3}He,pn|g)
111AG G 509.1 6 25 3 &
111AGX G FLAG=D
111AG cG E$see the 279|g
111AG L 568.8 1 5/2+
111AG B 0.10 8.2
111AGS B EAV= 622 23$
111AG G 438.5 1 5.8 6
111AG G 509.1 6 25 3 &
111AGX G FLAG=D
111AG L 606.93 9 5/2+ F
111AG B 0.39 7.7
111AGS B EAV= 605 23$
111AG G 202.2 4 1.2 3
111AG G 230.3 2 2.8 3
111AG G 476.7 1 6.9 6
111AG G 547.00 8 44 3
111AG L 641.7319 3/2-
111AG cL E$weakly populated in decay; enhanced in pickup
111AG2cL and stripping reactions
111AG G 352.2 6 0.7 3
111AG G 641.7 2 2.0 9 @
111AG cG RI$from I|g/I|g(352.2|g)=2.80 {I21} in ({+3}He,pn|g)
111AG L 683.04117/2+,9/2+
111AG G 552.6 2 1.9 3
111AG G 623.2 1 33 2
111AG L 710.2810(5/2+,7/2+)
111AG B 1.36 14 7.1 1
111AGS B EAV= 559 22$
111AG G 141.8 5 0.05 2 A
111AGB G FL=568.8
111AG G 580.00 8 100
111AG G 650.4 1 66 3
111AG L 809.0421 5/2-
111AG B 0.018 AP 8.8 AP
111AGS B EAV= 516 22$
111AG G 418 1 0.5 3
111AGX G FLAG=A
111AG G 519.3 2 1.2 6 B
111AG G 808.5 0.14 9 @
111AG cG RI$from I|g(519|g)/I|g(519|g+809|g)=0.08 {I4} in ({+3}He,pn|g)
111AG L 876.1 5
111AG B 0.022 AP 8.7 AP
111AGS B EAV= 487 22$
111AG G 166 1 1.5 10
111AG G 745.7 6 1.7 7
111AG G 816.5 100.9 5 A
111AG L 1062.2016(3/2+,5/2+)
111AG B 0.16 7.6
111AGS B EAV= 407 22$
111AG G 494.1 4 1.0 5
111AGX G FL=568.5
111AG G 657.3 6 2.8 3
111AG G 685.4 2 6.0 7
111AG G 773 1 0.5 2 A
111AG G 1002.3 3 7.3 13
111AG L 1085.6 4(7/2+)
111AG B 0.07 AP 7.9 AP
111AGS B EAV= 397 22$
111AG G 478.9 6 2.3 13
111AG G 516.4 6 3.1 7
111AG cG RI$assigned also to 1062.2 level; however, branching in ({+3}He,pn|g)
111AG2cG suggests that all the intensity belongs with the 1085.7 level
111AGX G FL=568.8
111AG G 955.5 6 4.5 4
111AG L 1086.4720(3/2+,5/2+)
111AG B 0.16 7.5
111AGS B EAV= 397 22$
111AG G 540.7 6 3.1 6
111AG G 709.8 2 15.0 15
111AG G 1026.6 101.0 5 A
111AG L 1119.3 4(3/2+)
111AG B 0.10 7.7
111AGS B EAV= 383 21$
111AG G 742.6 4 2.0 5
111AG G 1059.8 101.5 5 A
111AG L 1170.3 6(3/2+,5/2+)
111AG B 0.034 AP 8.1 AP
111AGS B EAV= 362 21$
111AG G 624 1 2.0 5 A
111AG cG RI$from I|g/I|g(794|g) in ({+3}He,pn|g) one expects I|g=0.4 {I7}
111AG G 793.8 6 2.1 4
111AG L 1180.29153/2+,5/2+
111AG B 0.17 7.4
111AGS B EAV= 358 21$
111AG G 611.3 4 2.1 5
111AGX G FL=568.8
111AG G 635 1 2.5 20
111AG G 775.5 3 5.0 5
111AG G 803.8 3 4.1 7
111AG G 890 1 0.5 2 A
111AG G 1120.4 2 16.0 15
111AG cG RI$assigned also to 1120 level by 1969Be11 but branching in
111AG2cG ({+3}He,pn|g) is consistent with placement entirely from 1190 level
111AG L 1210.44173/2+
111AG B 0.10 7.5
111AGS B EAV= 345 21$
111AG G 603.1 5 2.7 13
111AG cG RI$I|g:I|g(834|g):I|g(921|g)=1.09 {I24}: 1.0 {I7}: 2.90 {I12} in
111AG2cG ({+3}He,pn|g) suggests that only part of the 603|g should be assigned
111AG3cG as deexciting the 1210 level
111AG G 641.7 2 5.0 10 @
111AG cG E$placement from 1974Bu15; deexcites 1705 and/or 1519
111AG2cG levels (1969Be11,1969Sc12), placement in ({+3}He,pn|g) is from 1210
111AG3cG and 642 levels
111AG cG RI$from I|g=7.0 {I5} for the doubly placed 641.9|g and I|g deduced for
111AG2cG placement from the 642 level
111AGB G FL=568.8
111AG G 833 1 1.0 5 A
111AG G 921.4 6 2.9 6
111AG L 1506.1 7 ?
111AG G 937.3 100.8 4 A
111AGB G FL=568.8
111AG G 1506 1 0.1 1 A
111AG L 1518.80145/2+,7/2+
111AG B 1.4 2 5.8 1
111AGS B EAV= 222 20$
111AG G 308.4 2 1.1 1
111AG G 808.5 3.1 4 @
111AG cG RI$from I|g=3.2 {I4} for the doubly placed 809|g (weighted average of
111AG2cG 3.4 {i5} (1977Kr14), 3.0 {i15} (1969Be11), 2.6 {i8} (1969Sc12) and I|g
111AG3cG deduced for placement from the 809 level
111AG G 835.7 2 32 2
111AG G 950.0 101.0 4 A
111AGB G FL=568.8
111AG G 1388.5 2 64 5
111AG G 1459.0 3 67 5
111AG L 1602.5 45/2+
111AG cL E$based on |g|g-anticoincidence spectra (1974Bu15)
111AG B 0.029 AP 7.3 AP
111AGS B EAV= 190 19$
111AG G 1311.2 100.9 5 A
111AG G 1542.9 4 2.6 3
111AG L 1621.9 83/2+
111AG cL E$({+3}He,d) excitation with L=2 probably corresponds
111AG B 0.013 AP 7.6 AP
111AGS B EAV= 183 19$
111AG G 1015 1 1.0 5 A
111AG G 1053 1 0.5 3 A
111AGB G FL=568.8
111AG L 1674.3 43/2-
111AG B 0.021 AP 7.2 AP
111AGS B EAV= 164 19$
111AG G 1067.1 5 1.5 5 A
111AG G 1269.7 5 1.0 3 A
111AG L 1704.8 4(5/2+,7/2+)
111AG B 0.06 AP 6.7 AP
111AGS B EAV= 153 19$
111AG G 1022 1 0.8 4 A
111AG G 1098 1 0.8 4 A
111AG G 1574.5 5 3.1 5
111AG G 1644.3 102.3 5 A