108PD 108RH B- DECAY (6.0 M) 1984BH02,1969PI08 ENSDF 200810
108PD H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jean Blachot$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=1-Jul-2008$
108PD H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jean Blachot$CIT=NDS 91, 135 (2000)$CUT=1-Jun-2000
108PD C 1969Pi08 activity: Pd(n,p) E={ 14 MeV}. Measured: |g, |g|g, |g(t).
108PD C 1984Bh02 activity: Pd(n,p) E={ 14 MeV}. Measured: |g, |g|g, |g(t).
108PD C The decay scheme is that proposed by 1984Bh02. The |g spectrum has
108PDaC been studied to { 3500 keV}.
108PD CB IB$From I(|g+ce)-imbalance at each level
108PD CG RI$From 1984Bh02. The 747, 1528, 1815 gammas given by 1969Pi08 are
108PDaCG not seen by 1984Bh02.
108PD CL J$Adopted values given.
108RH P 0.0+X (5+) 6.0 M 3 4.51E+3 11
108RH CP E$E=-60 (110) in 2003Au03
108PD N 0.877 15 1.0 1.0
108PD CN NR$from sum I(|g to g.s.)=100.
108PD G 437.6 3 6 1
108PD L 0 0+
108PD L 434.21 182+
108PD G 434.2 1 100 C
108PD L 931.29 202+
108PD G 497.4 2 22 1 C
108PD CG RI$I|g=25.2 (1969Pi08)
108PD G 931.6 2 14 2
108PD CG RI$I|g=9.8 (1969Pi08)
108PD L 1048.98 244+
108PD G 614.3 4 24 2 C
108PD CG RI$I|g=30.5 (1969Pi08)
108PD L 1335.67 22(3+)
108PD G 404.3 2 30 3
108PD CG RI$I|g=30.2 (1969Pi08)
108PD G 901.3 2 32 3 C
108PD CG RI$I|g=33.5 (1969Pi08)
108PD L 1772.3 3 6+
108PD B 6.1 25 6.8 3
108PDX B EAV=1093
108PD G 723.3 5 12 2 C
108PD CG RI$I|g=8.0 (1969Pi08)
108PD L 2283.0 3
108PD G 947.5 4 56 3
108PD CG RI$I|g=54.6 (1969Pi08). Value of 36 seems to be a misprint in
108PDaCG 1984Bh02. From the authors' decay scheme, an intensity balance gives
108PDaCG RI>58 6.
108PD G 1234.3 3 10 2 C
108PD CG RI$I|g=8.7 (1969Pi08)
108PD L 2536.4 6
108PD B 21 5 5.60 10
108PDX B EAV=741
108PD G 2102.2 5 30 5
108PD L 2864.4 3 4+,5+,6+
108PD B 68 5 4.84 9
108PDX B EAV=594
108PD CB E${ 1570 {i50}} (1969Pi08) |b|g-coin
108PD G 327.6 3 6 1
108PD G 581.1 2 68 5
108PD CG RI$I|g=64.3 (1969Pi08)
108PD G 1092.5 3 5 2
108PD CG RI$I|g=3.2 (1969Pi08)