108CD 108IN EC DECAY (39.6 M) 1975FL01,1984RO10 ENSDF 200810
108CD H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jean Blachot$CIT=ENSDF$CUT=1-Jul-2008$
108CD H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jean Blachot$CIT=NDS 91, 135 (2000)$CUT=1-Jun-2000$
108CD c The decay scheme, E|g, I|g, and |g|g-coincidence relations are those
108CD2c measured by 1975Fl01. Other measurements: 1962Ka23, 1963Ka18,
108CD3c 1970Di13 and 1984Ro10.
108CD c Many unplaced transitions reported by 1984Ro10 are given in the
108CD2c 58.0-min {+108}In decay. Some could be for this decay also.
108CD c 1992Ku01 have found a strong 1088 |g from a level at 1721 to the 657
108CD2c level. They give |g branching but they do not say to what isomer the
108CD3c gammas belong. Authors report |a(K)exp data from decay and (p,p'|g).
108CD4c These data are given in (p,p'|g).
108CD cE TI$From I(|g+ce) imbalance at each level
108CD cG M$Based on |a(K)exp from relative I(ce(K)) and I|g of 1984Ro10
108CD2cG normalized so that |a(K)exp(633|g)=0.00301 (E2 theory)
108CD cG E,RI$From 1975Fl01
108CD cG E(A)$Placed by 1975Fl01 from the 3452 level; however, agreement with
108CD2cG energy and branching ratio in (n,n'|g) and in-beam data suggest
108CD3cG population of the 2486 level.
108IN P 29.75 5 2+ 39.6 M 7 5137 9
108IN cP QP$Q(g.s.)=5149 {i14} (1986Bo28)
108CD N 0.764 6 1.0 1.0
108CD cN NR$normalization of the decay scheme per 100 decays of the parent was
108CD2cN made by assuming the sum of |g's to the g.s.=100%. 1963Ka18
108CD3cN established the absence of g.s. feeding using |b|g-coincidence
108CD4cN measurements. |b{++}, |e feeding to the levels was deduced by
108CD5cN requiring an intensity balance at each level. Approximately 10% of
108CD6cN the total intensity observed by 1975Fl01 was not placed in the decay
108CD7cN scheme by the authors.
108CD G 156.2 2 0.21 3
108CD G 171.4 2 1.03 7
108CD G 391.3 1 0.47 7
108CD G 536.1 1 1.06 9
108CD G 936.0 3 0.25 8
108CD G 1293.7 3 0.94 11
108CD G 1408.5 3 0.19 10
108CD G 1475.0 3 0.77 13
108CD G 1513.1 2 1.19 13
108CD G 1864.0 4 0.70 20
108CD G 2112.4 3 0.33 4
108CD G 2278.3 5 0.82 12
108CD G 2316.9 6 0.40 10
108CD G 2816.0 10 0.91 15
108CD G 3689.4 22 1.40 20
108CD G 4052.0 25 0.8 3
108CD G 4342.8 23 1.0 3
108CD L 0 0+ STABLE
108CD L 632.99 15 2+
108CD G 632.9 2 100 E2 C
108CD cG M$E2 from adopted |g's
108CD E 30.4 103.50 126.520 17 33.9 11
108CDS E EAV=1599.2 43$CK=0.0893 7$CL=0.01127 8$CM+=0.002810 20
108CD cE E$E=3494 {i10} (1986Bo28)
108CD L 1508.4 5 4+
108CD G 875.4 4 3.20 20 E2 C
108CD cG M$|a(K)exp allows M1,E2. |DJ=2 from |g(|q) in (p,2n|g)
108CD L 1601.18 20 2+
108CD G 968.5 5 5.7 3 M1,E2 C
108CD G 1601.2 3 5.3 3 E2 C
108CD E 3.7 3 1.1 1 6.81 4 4.8 4
108CDS E EAV=1145.6 42$CK=0.2016 17$CL=0.02553 22$CM+=0.00637 6
108CD L 1720.5 0+
108CD G 1087.5 5 2.00 14 C
108CD L 1913.03 24 0+
108CD G 311.6 3 1.32 9 C
108CD G 1280.1 4 0.65 9
108CD G 1913.4 4 E0
108CD cG RI$pure E0 gives I|g=0, so I|g=0.13 {i3} from 1975Fl01 probably is an
108CD2cG error. I|g<0.1 (1984Ro10)
108CD cG M$|a(K)exp>0.012 (1984Ro10), >0.025 (1992Ku01)
108CD L 2162.6 4 2+
108CD G 1529.4 5 9.6 5 C
108CD cG M$1984Ro10 determine |a(K)exp=0.00019 which indicates E1. This mult
108CD2cG is not confirmed by new measurement of 1990Ku01 or by data in
108CD3cG (n,n'|g).
108CD E 4.4 2 2.9 2 6.24 3 7.3 4
108CDS E EAV=887.1 42$CK=0.342 3$CL=0.0434 4$CM+=0.01083 10
108CD L 2202.3 4 3-
108CD G 1569.3 3 1.28 13 C
108CD E 0.58 6 0.40 4 7.09 5 0.98 10
108CDS E EAV=869.0 42$CK=0.355 3$CL=0.0451 4$CM+=0.01125 10
108CD L 2365.3 3 2+
108CD G 1732.1 4 5.0 3 M1,E2 C
108CD G 2365.1 5 0.70 10
108CD E 2.3 2 2.1 1 6.32 4 4.4 3
108CDS E EAV=794.8 41$CK=0.414 4$CL=0.0526 5$CM+=0.01312 11
108CD L 2486 2+
108CD G 884.1 3 0.37 8
108CDF G FLAG=A
108CD G 1851.9 5 4.0 3 C
108CDF G FLAG=A
108CD E 1.5 1 1.8 1 6.36 3 3.3 2
108CDS E EAV=740.1 41$CK=0.462 4$CL=0.0587 5$CM+=0.01465 12
108CD L 2619.0 4 2+,3+
108CD G 1017.7 4 0.20 6
108CD G 1986.3 5 16.2 9 M1,E2 C
108CD E 5.0 3 7.5 4 5.68 3 12.5 7
108CDS E EAV=680.1 41$CK=0.518 4$CL=0.0659 5$CM+=0.01645 13
108CD L 2681.5 3 2+
108CD G 2048.3 4 4.0 4 C
108CD G 2681.3 4 1.00 10
108CD E 1.3 1 2.2 3 6.19 5 3.5 4
108CDS E EAV=652.1 41$CK=0.545 4$CL=0.0695 6$CM+=0.01733 13
108CD L 3046.7 3 1+,2+
108CD G 1445.6 4 0.32 8
108CD G 2413.2 6 1.90 10
108CD G 3046.8 4 3.2 3
108CD E 0.76 6 3.3 2 5.87 4 4.1 3
108CDS E EAV=489.4 40$CK=0.703 4$CL=0.0898 5$CM+=0.02243 12
108CD L 3452.5 3 1+,2+
108CD G 770.9 2 0.42 7 C
108CD cG E$a 770.5|g reported by 1984Ro10 is placed by them from a 3561 level.
108CD G 3452.2 5 12.0 7
108CD E 0.41 3 9.1 6 5.25 3 9.5 6
108CDS E EAV=311.6 40$CK=0.8243 17$CL=0.10585 24$CM+=0.02645 6
108CD L 3811.5 3 1+,2+
108CD G 2211.1 5 0.70 10
108CD G 3178.4 4 2.1 3 C
108CD G 3811.8 5 5.5 4
108CD E 0.017 2 6.3 4 5.21 3 6.3 4
108CDS E EAV=156.0 40$CK=0.8585 3$CL=0.11103 6$CM+=0.02777 2
108CD L 3825.4 6 1+,2+
108CD G 2224.2 5 1.80 20
108CD G 3825.5 20 3.1 3
108CD E 0.0085 123.7 3 5.43 4 3.7 3
108CDS E EAV=149.9 40$CK=0.8588 3$CL=0.11111 6$CM+=0.02779 2