106IN 106SN EC DECAY (115 S) 1988BA10,1978VA20 08NDS 200806
106IN H TYP=FUL$AUT=D. DE FRENNE AND A. NEGRET$CIT=NDS 109, 943 (2008)$
106IN2 H CUT=1-May-2007$
106IN c 1978Va20: {+96}Ru({+16}O,2p4n). Measured: E|g, I, |g|g, |gX. Deduced:
106IN2c {+106}In levels, log| {Ift}, J|p
106IN c 1988Ba10: mass separated activity from {+58}Ni({+58}Ni,6p4n).
106IN2c Measured: E|g, I|g |g|g, ce. Deduced {+106}In levels, log| {Ift}, J|p
106IN3c Mini-orange spectrometer and several Ge(Li) detectors
106IN c Others: 1974HsZY, 1975Bu26, 1979Pl06, 1981Bu20
106IN CE $As EC decay energy is 318E+1 KEV and highest detected G only 1.9 MEV
106IN2cE it might be that the decay scheme is incomplete and therefore the
106IN3CE results on LOGFT an upper limit.
106IN C No details were given as to the G and CE intensity scales
106IN cL Decay scheme from 1988Ba10
106IN cL J From adopted levels
106IN cG E From 1978Va20
106IN cG RI From 1988Ba10. Other: 1978Va20
106IN cG CC Conversion data from 1988Ba10
106IN cG M Based on |a(K)exp and |a(L)exp (1988Ba10)
106IN cE IE From 1988Ba10
106IN N 0.29 1.0 1.0 1.0
106IN cN NR based on |S((I(|g+ce)) to 28.5)=100
106SN P 0.0 0+ 115 S 5 318E+1 5
106IN L 0.0 7+ 6.2 M 1
106IN L 28.6 10(2)+ 5.2 M 1 M1
106IN cL %|e+%|b{++}=100; IT decay unobserved
106IN cL E taken from 1984Fi05 in{+106}Cd(p,n|g)
106IN L 150.9 10 (2)+
106IN G 122.3 1 46 M1 0.290 4 C
106INS G K/T=0.1959 $L/T=0.02460 $M/T=0.00476 $N/T=0.00104
106IN3 G EKC=0.25 3$ELC=0.0032 4$
106IN L 203.4 11(3)+
106IN G 52.5 2 7.9 APM1 3.26 5 C
106INS G K/T=0.663 $L/T=0.0844 $M/T=0.01630 $N/T=0.00355
106IN3 G ELC=0.32 11
106IN CG $LC=0.359 5
106IN L 252.7 10(3)+
106IN G 49.3 2 6.8 APM1 3.91 6 C
106IN3 G ELC=0.45 9
106IN CG $LC=0.432 7
106IN G 101.9 2 4.6 M1 0.419 6 C
106INS G K/T=0.284 $L/T=0.0358 $M/T=0.00692 $N/T=0.00151
106IN3 G EKC=0.45 6
106IN G 224.1 2 45 C
106IN L 505.9 10 (1+)
106IN E 0.5 LT 5.5 GT 0.5 LT
106INS E EAV=738 23
106IN G 253.2 1 100 C
106IN G 355.0 1 3.4 C
106IN cG E Observed only by 1988Ba10 with I(|g+ce)=1
106IN G 477.2 2 93 C
106IN L 892.3 11 1+
106IN E 59 0.032 2.9 59
106INS E EAV=565 23$CK=0.00054 8$
106IN cE E(|b{++})=1240 {I80} derived from measured |e/|b{++}=2.9
106IN2cE {I2} via (712|g)(477|g,|g{+|+}) compared with theory (1979Pl06)
106IN G 386.5 2 134 C
106IN G 863.8 3 83
106IN L 1218.3 11 1+
106IN E 37 0.054 2.6 37
106INS E EAV=420 22$CK=0.0015 3$
106IN cE E(|b{++})=923 {I115} derived from measured |e/|b{++}=8 {I2}
106IN2cE via (386|g)(326|g,477|g,|g{+|+}) compared with theory (1979Pl06)
106IN G 326.2 3 14 C
106IN G 712.3 3 48 C
106IN G 1189.6 3 66
106IN L 1602.2 151+
106IN E 1.0 0.010 3.1 1
106INS E EAV=253 22$CK=0.010 4$
106IN G 1096.3 3.4
106IN L 1925.3 151+
106IN E 2 0.5 1.2 2
106INS E EAV=112 23$CK=0.25 25$
106IN G 1419.4 7