106CD 106IN EC DECAY (6.2 M) 08NDS 200806
106CD H TYP=FUL$AUT=D. DE FRENNE AND A. NEGRET$CIT=NDS 109, 943 (2008)$
106CD2 H CUT=1-May-2007$
106CD c Experimental results are considered as incomplete by the evaluators
106CD2c as the beta decay energy is very high (6526 keV 11)
106CD3c A number of inconsistencies in the |e feeding of some levels are
106CD3c observed. See also decay of other {+106}In isomer
106CD c 1992Ku01: source: {+106}Cd(p,n) E not given. Measured: E|g, I|g, ce(K)
106CD2c deduced: {+106}Cd levels, J|p, |a(K)exp, mult
106CD c 1978Hu06: source: {+106}Cd(p,n) E=11,15 MeV. Measured: |g singles,
106CD2c |g|g and |b|g |b singles. Deduced: {+106}Cd levels, J, |p, log| {Ift}
106CD c 1984Ro10: source {+106}In from Sn(p,2pxn), on-line mass separation.
106CD3c Measured E|g, I|g, Ice, |g|g and |g(ce). Deduced: log| {Ift},
106CD4c {+106}Cd levels, J, |p, |a, mult
106CD c Others: 1972Me02, 1976Fl14, 1980Wi20
106CD c Q(|e)=6531 {I16} keV calculated from 1984Fi05
106IN P 0.0 7+ 6.2 M 1 6526 11
106CD N 0.997 1.0
106CD cN (|e+|b{++}) branching to low-lying (J|<5) states is unlikely
106CD CL BAND(D) DJ=2 g.s. band
106CD cL E(B) Observed only by 1984Ro10
106CD cL E(F) Observed only by 1980Wi20
106CD CL E(E) Only one deexciting |g observed by 1984Ro10
106CD cL J From adopted levels
106CD cG E,RI E|g with I|g values are from 1978Hu06,
106CD2cG unless otherwise noted.
106CD2cG E|g values for transitions with no I|g are from 1984Ro10. For I|g see
106CD3cG 1984Ro10, they are not given for {+106}In(5.2 min) and
106CD4cG {+106}In(6.2 min) |e decay separately. Unassigned |g's of 1984Ro10
106CD5cG given in both decays
106CD cG E(E),RI(E)$Taken from 1980Wi20. No |DI|g given by the authors.
106CD2cG Estimated by the evaluators to be 10%
106CD cG M From 1984Ro10; based on conversion electron data
106CD G 308.9 2
106CD G 314.6 2
106CD G 390.7 2
106CD G 395.5 2
106CD G 438.6 2
106CD G 636.2 2
106CD G 690.9 2
106CD G 802.1 2
106CD G 808.3 2 C
106CD G 1063.7 2
106CD G 1076.9 2
106CD G 1145 1 3.9 10
106CD G 1173.7 2
106CD G 1243.3 2
106CD G 1298.8 2
106CD G 1373.6 2
106CD G 1505.9 2 C
106CD G 1518.6 2
106CD G 1524.9 2
106CD G 1550.5 2
106CD G 1622.1 2
106CD G 1633.2 2
106CD G 1757.1 2
106CD G 1896.4 2
106CD G 2005.3 2 C
106CD G 2046.2 2 C
106CD G 2225.7 2 C
106CD G 2390.3 2 C
106CD G 2414.1 2 C
106CD G 2449.0 2 C
106CD G 2494.3 2 C
106CD G 2551.4 2
106CD G 2586.2 2
106CD L 0.0 0+ D
106CD L 632.60 102+ D
106CD E 7 LT 7.0 GT 7 LT
106CDS E EAV=2247.1 53
106CD G 632.6 1 100 E2 0.0030 C
106CD L 1493.71 134+ D
106CD E 10 6 6.5 3 10 6 ?
106CDS E EAV=1835.5 53
106CD cE Very improbable that this level is directly fed in |e decay
106CD2cE because J|p({+106}In)=7+
106CD G 861.1 1 90 5 E2 0.0014 C
106CD cG RI from 1976Fl14
106CD L 2104.52 134+
106CD E 1.1 7 7.1 3 1.1 7 ?
106CDS E EAV=1546.1 52
106CD cE Very improbable that this level is directly fed in |e decay
106CD2cE because J|p({+106}In)=7+
106CD G 610.7 2 3.6 3E2 0.0035 C
106CD cG RI from 1976Fl14
106CD G 1471.9 1 6.6 5 C
106CD cG RI weighted average of 3.0 {I12} (1978Hu06) and 7.2 {I5}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14)
106CD L 2305.15 214+
106CD E 0.87 14 7.07 7 0.87 14
106CDS E EAV=1451.7 52
106CD cE Very improbable that this level is directly fed in |e decay
106CD2cE because J|p({+106}In)=7+
106CD G 811.1 4 1.28 9 M1,E2
106CD cG RI weighted average of 1.2 {I2} (1978Hu06) and 1.3 {I1}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14)
106CD G 1672.6 3 0.19 3 E2
106CD L 2330.26 165+
106CD E 7.0 5 6.15 4 7.0 5 ?
106CDS E EAV=1439.9 52
106CD cE If for {+106}In g.s. J|p=7+, then |b{+-} transition to
106CD2cE 2330-keV level is second forbidden and log| {Ift}=6.21 is too small.
106CD3cE However, because several of the transitions feeding this level have no
106CD4cE intensity given they easily could account for the feeding of the
106CD5cE 2330-keV level. Also a number of |g's deexciting unobserved levels fed
106CD6cE in |e decay could have been missed
106CD G 225.7 2 6.9 3 M1+E2 0.051 7 C
106CD3 G EKC=0.055 6 (1992KU01)$
106CD cG RI weighted average of 7.0 {I4} (1978Hu06) and 6.7 {I5}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14)
106CD G 836.7 4 2.8 2 M1,E2 C
106CD3 G EKC=0.0026 4 (1992KU01)$
106CD L 2468.3 5 4+
106CD G 974.6 4 1.6 1 C ?
106CD cG Observed only by 1978Hu06.
106CD L 2485.58 174+ F
106CD E 0.5 LT 7.2 GT 0.5 LT
106CDS E EAV=1367.0 52
106CD cE Direct feeding of this level in |e decay highly improbable
106CD2cE because J|p({+106}In)=7+. Probably an important fraction of
106CD3cE the |e decay to higher lying levels is missed
106CD G 992.1 2 1.50 15 E
106CD G 1853.0 2 0.9 1 E
106CD L 2491.72 146+ D
106CD E 10.6 20 5.87 9 10.6 20C
106CDS E EAV=1364.1 52
106CD cE E(|b{++})=2.56 MeV {I20} (1978Hu06) |b(998|g). Other:
106CD2cE 2.7 MeV {I1} (1966Ca09) |b(860|g,990|g)
106CD G 161.0 2 0.5 1 E
106CD G 186.6 2 0.6 1
106CD G 997.8 1 41.5 17 C
106CD cG RI weighted average of 48 {I3} (1978Hu06) and 38.6 {I20}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14).
106CD L 2502.92 156+
106CD E 8.3 14 5.97 8 8.3 14C
106CDS E EAV=1358.9 52
106CD cE E(|b{++})=2.59 MeV {I20} (1978Hu06) |b(1009|g)
106CD G 1009.3 1 27.5 10 C
106CD cG RI weighted average of 30.4 {I15} (1978Hu06) and 25.3 {I13}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14)
106CD L 2629.02 195-
106CD E 2.50 23 7.75 5 2.50 23C1U
106CDS E EAV=1309.5 51
106CD G 524.6 2 1.9 2 E1 0.0018 E
106CD G 1135.2 2 0.6 1
106CD cG E,RI from 1980Wi20
106CD L 2920.22 245 B
106CD G 1426.5 2 C
106CD L 2924.67 20 6+
106CD E 3.5 4 6.05 5 3.5 4 C
106CDS E EAV=1162.2 51
106CD G 433.1 2 2.3 3 E2 0.0093 EC
106CD G 820.3 2 C ?
106CD cG E observed only by 1984Ro10
106CD G 1430.8 2 1.2 2 EC
106CD L 3043.91 178+
106CD E 39.8 11 0.002568 4.901 17 39.8 11
106CDS E EAV=1106.9 51$CK=6.42E-5 9$
106CD G 541.0 3 12.5 5 C
106CD cG RI weighted average of 12.7 {I7} (1978Hu06) and 12.4 {I6}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14)
106CD G 552.4 2 25.2 9 C
106CD cG RI weighted average of 25.8 {I13} (1978Hu06) and 24.7 {I13}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14)
106CD G 558.6 2 2.2 2 E
106CD L 3084.03 237+
106CD E 6.2 4 5.68 3 6.2 4
106CDS E EAV=1088.4 51
106CD G 580.7 5 0.7 1 C
106CD G 592.1 4 3.0 3 C
106CD G 753.3 4 2.5 2 C
106CD L 3126.03 187+
106CD E 2.80 23 5.99 4 2.80 23
106CDS E EAV=1069.0 51
106CD G 623.2 2 1.8 2 M1+E2 0.0039 EC
106CD G 634.1 2 1.0 1 EC
106CD L 3283.93 20 + B ?
106CD G 780.7 2 E2 0.0016 C
106CD G 792.5 2 C
106CD L 3357.7 3 B ?
106CD G 1027.4 2 C
106CD L 3366.97 208+ B
106CD G 282.7 2 C
106CD G 875.2 2 E2 0.0015 C
106CD L 3472.71 18 B
106CD G 980.8 2 C
106CD cG E different placement given by 1978Hu06
106CD G 1142.7 2 C
106CD G 1978.9 2 C
106CD L 3547.44 18 + B
106CD G 421.3 2 E2 0.015 C
106CD G 1217.5 2 C
106CD G 1442.7 2 C
106CD L 3641.93 17(8+)
106CD E 2.7 7 5.53 12 2.7 7
106CDS E EAV=832.3 50
106CD G 1139.0 2 2.7 7 (M1) 0.0008 EC
106CD cG E,RI from 1978Hu06
106CD cG M$From level scheme Mult=Q
106CD G 1149.4 2 C
106CD G 2148.8 2 C
106CD L 3787.33 20 B
106CD G 1284.6 2 C
106CD G 1295.4 2 C
106CD L 4243.51 20+ B ?
106CD G 601.4 2 M1 0.0043 C
106CD G 1199.7 2 C
106CD L 4282.59 20 F ?
106CD E 1.89 20 0.0011112 4.88 5 1.89 20
106CDS E EAV=544.1 49$CK=0.000590 18$
106CD G 1780.1 2 1.5 2 E
106CD G 1790.4 2 0.40 4 E
106CD L 4398.6 3 B ?
106CDF L FLAG=E
106CD G 1031.6 2 C
106CD L 5130.67 19 B
106CD G 887.1 2 C
106CD G 1488.7 2 C
106CD G 1763.4 2 C
106CD G 2087.1 2 C