106CD 106IN EC DECAY (5.2 M) 08NDS 200806
106CD H TYP=FUL$AUT=D. DE FRENNE AND A. NEGRET$CIT=NDS 109, 943 (2008)$
106CD2 H CUT=1-May-2007$
106CD c Experimental results are considered as tentative by the evaluators. A
106CD2c number of |e branches are inconsistent with the required |DJ|p for
106CD3c |e+|b{++} decay. This points to a very incomplete or wrong decay scheme
106CD4c See also decay of other {+106}In isomer
106CD c 1978Hu06: source: {+106}Cd(p,n) E=11,15 MeV. Measured: |g singles,
106CD2c |g|g and |b|g, |b singles. Deduced: {+106}Cd levels, J, |p, log| {Ift}
106CD c 1984Ro10: source {+106}In from Sn(p,2pxn), on-line mass separation.
106CD2c Measured E|g, I|g, Ice, |g|g and |g(ce). Deduced: log| {Ift},
106CD3c {+106}Cd levels, J, |p, |a, mult
106CD c 1992Ku01: source: {+106}Cd(p,n) E not given. Measured: E|g, I|g, ce(K),
106CD2c deduced: {+106}Cd levels, J|p, |a(K)exp, mult
106CD c 2007Li07: {+106}In formed with {+106}Cd(p,n) reaction using an 11 MeV
106CD2c proton beam. Measured E|g, |g|g, I|g, |g|g(|q) using the Horus Cube
106CD3c spectrometer comprised of four BGO-shielded HPGe detectors, five HPGe
106CD4c detectors, and the Cologne Euroball Cluster detector. Angular
106CD5c correlation defined by angles 55|', 70|', 90|', and 180|' between the
106CD6c occupied detector positions. A possible candidate
106CD7c for quadrupole-octupole coupled 1- state proposed at 2825 keV
106CD c Others: 1969St18, 1972Me02, 1976Fl14
106CD cG E,RI$E|g with I|g values are from 1978Hu06, unless otherwise noted.
106CD2cG E|g values for transitions with no I|g are from 1984Ro10. For I|g see
106CD3cG 1984Ro10, not given for {+106}In(5.2 min) and {+106}In(6.2 min) |e
106CD4cG decay separately. Unassigned |g's of 1984Ro10 given in both decays
106CD cG CC From 1984Ro10
106CD cG |a(K)exp: from 1992Ku01. Normalized to
106CDxcG |a(K)exp(633|g)=0.0035 {i1} [E2 theory from Bricc]
106CD cG M Based on conversion electron data (1984Ro10) and |a(K)exp and
106CD2cG |g(|q) (1992Ku01) if available
106CD cL T Taken from adopted levels
106CD cL J From adopted levels
106CD cL E(B) Observed only by 1984Ro10. Not clear whether level belongs to
106CD2cL |e decay of {+106}In(6.2 min) or to the |e decay of {+106}In(5.2 min)
106IN P 28.6 3 (2)+ 5.2 M 1 6526 11
106CD N 0.918 8 1.0 1.0
106CD cN NR for I(|g+ce)=100 to g.s.; negligible IT decay is assumed.
106CD2cN |DI|g(1716|g)=50% assumed by the evaluators
106CD G 308.9 2
106CD G 314.6 2
106CD G 390.7 2
106CD G 395.5 2
106CD G 438.6 2
106CD G 636.2 2
106CD G 690.9 2
106CD G 802.1 2
106CD G 808.3 2 C
106CD G 1063.7 2
106CD G 1076.9 2
106CD G 1173.7 2
106CD G 1243.3 2
106CD G 1298.8 2
106CD G 1373.6 2
106CD G 1505.9 2 C
106CD G 1518.6 2
106CD G 1524.9 2
106CD G 1550.5 2
106CD G 1622.1 2
106CD G 1633.2 2
106CD G 1757.1 2
106CD G 1853.3 2 C
106CD G 1896.4 2
106CD G 2005.3 2 C
106CD G 2046.2 2 C
106CD G 2225.7 2 C
106CD G 2390.3 2 C
106CD G 2414.1 2 C
106CD G 2449.0 2 C
106CD G 2494.3 2 C
106CD G 2551.4 2
106CD G 2586.2 2
106CD G 3223.0 5 0.8 1
106CD G 3394.5 4 1.1 1
106CD G 3889.2 5 0.9 1
106CD G 3912.0 8 0.5 2
106CD L 0.0 0+ STABLE
106CD L 632.51 92+ 7.27 PS 9
106CD E 37.723 1.6210 6.20 3 39.3 24
106CD2 E EAV= 2258 6$CK= 0.03570 23$CL= 0.00450 3$CM+= 0.001121 8
106CD cE E(|b{++})=4.82 MeV {I15} (1978Hu06) |b singles, |b(633|g).
106CD2cE Other: 4.89 MeV {I3} (1966Ca09) |b(633|g), |b singles
106CD G 632.66 4 100 E2 0.0035 C
106CD cG E$From 2007Li07
106CD3 G EKC=0.0030 10$
106CD L 1493.59 134+ 0.87 PS 11
106CD E 7.215 0.5512 6.54 9 7.8 16
106CD2 E EAV= 1847 6$CK= 0.0612 5$CL= 0.00773 6$CM+=0.001925 15
106CD cE log| {Ift} inconsistent with |DJ|p requirements. Direct |e
106CD2cE feeding almost excluded. Probably an important fraction of |g's
106CD3cE deexciting higher lying levels has been missed
106CD G 861.1 1 10.0 16E2 0.0016 C
106CD cG RI unweighted average of 11.6 {I18} (1978Hu06) E(n) 8.5 {I11}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14)
106CD3 G EKC=0.0014 1$
106CD L 1716.52 92+ 0.31 PS 5
106CD cL I|g(1083.8|g)/I|g(1716.4|g)=0.94 {I17} (2007Li07)
106CD E 6.2 5 0.56 5 6.49 4 6.8 5
106CD2 E EAV= 1741 6$CK= 0.0715 6$CL= 0.00903 8$CM+=0.002251 18
106CD G 1083.8 13.4 2 E2+M1 -1.53 14 0.0010 C
106CD cG E,M,MR$From 2007Li07
106CD3 G EKC=0.00084 10
106CD cG RI From 1978Hu06. Other: 3.0 {I8} (1976Fl14)
106CD G 1716.47 8 4.2 5 E2
106CD cG E$Weighted average of 1716.4 {I1} (1978Hu06),1716.7 {I2} (1984Ro10)
106CD2cG and 1716.5 {I2} (2007Li07)
106CD cG RI calculated based on the weighted average of the ratio
106CD2cG I|g(1084|g)/I|g(1716|g)=0.81 {I8} obtained from 0.70 {I9} (Coul. Ex);
106CD3cG 1.02 {I19} (n,n'|g); 1.17 {I25} (p,p'|g) and 0.91 {I20} (p,2n|g).
106CD cG M$From 2007Li07
106CD L 1795.12 140+
106CD E 1.0912 0.10412 7.21 5 1.19 13
106CD2 E EAV= 1704 6$CK= 0.0757 6$CL= 0.00956 8$CM+=0.002382 20
106CD cE log| {Ift} inconsistent with |DJ|p requirements. Direct |e
106CD2cE feeding almost excluded. Probably an important fraction of |g's
106CD3cE deexciting higher lying levels has been missed
106CD G 1162.6 1 1.7 1 E2 C
106CD cG RI other: 1.0 {I6} (1976Fl14)
106CD3 G EKC=0.00068 9$
106CD L 2034.8 B ?
106CD G 1402.1 2 ?
106CD cG E Observed only by 1984Ro10, not confirmed by coincidences
106CD L 2104.40 124+
106CD E 2.5 7 0.31 8 6.6711 2.8 7
106CD2 E EAV= 1557 6$CK= 0.0955 9$CL= 0.01206 11$CM+= 0.00301 3
106CD cE log| {Ift} inconsistent with |DJ|p requirements. Direct |e
106CD2cE feeding almost excluded. Probably an important fraction of |g's
106CD3cE deexciting higher lying levels has been missed
106CD G 387.7 2 E2 0.0143 C
106CD G 610.7 2 1.5 7 E2 0.0035 C
106CD cG RI unweighted average of 2.2 {I8} (1978Hu06) and 0.8 {I2}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14)
106CD3 G EKC=0.0037 4$
106CD G 1471.9 1 1.5 3 E2 0.00057 C
106CD cG RI other: 1.4 {I5} (1978Hu06)
106CD3 G EKC=0.00037 5$
106CD L 2143.86 180+
106CD E 0.39 5 0.050 6 7.46 5 0.44 5
106CD2 E EAV= 1539 6$CK= 0.0985 9$CL= 0.01244 11$CM+= 0.00310 3
106CD G 427.2 3 0.14 2 E2
106CD cG E,RI from 1992Ku01
106CD G 1511.4 3 0.34 5 E2
106CD cG E,RI from 1992Ku01
106CD G 2143.9 3 E0
106CD3 G EKC GT 0.042
106CD cG EKC |a(K)exp>35(|a(K)exp (M4))
106CD cG E,RI from 1992Ku01
106CD L 2252.3 3(4+)
106CD G 758.8 3
106CD cG E from 1992Ku01
106CD G 1619.6 6
106CD cG E from 1992Ku01
106CD cG EKC |a(K)exp=0.00034 {I5} for doublet of 1619.6|g + 1621.4|g
106CD cG RI a value of 5.4 {I3} for the doublet of 1619.6|g + 1621.4|g is
106CD2cG given for the decay of the two isomers together by (1992Ku01)
106CD L 2253.2 3(2+,3+)
106CD G 536.2 3
106CD G 1621.4 4
106CD cG EKC |a(K)exp=0.00034 {I5} for doublet of 1619.6|g + 1621.4|g
106CD cG RI a value of 5.4 {I3} for the doublet of 1619.6|g + 1621.4|g is
106CD2cG given for the decay of the two isomers together by (1992Ku01)
106CD L 2347.43 22(2)+
106CD E 12.410 1.9215 5.83 4 14.3 11
106CD2 E EAV= 1443 6$CK= 0.1159 11$CL= 0.01465 14$CM+= 0.00365 4
106CD G 1714.9 2 16.1 11 C
106CD cG E from 1984Ro10. Others: 1714.7 {I3} (1992Ku01), 1716.4
106CDxcG (1978Hu06)
106CD cG RI obtained from I|g(doublet 1715|g)=20.3 - I|g(1716|g from 1716
106CD2cG level)=4.2 {I5} (1978Hu06)
106CD L 2370.4 3(2)+
106CD E 1.5912 0.25218 6.71 4 1.84 13
106CD2 E EAV= 1432 6$CK= 0.1181 11$CL= 0.01493 14$CM+= 0.00372 4
106CD G 575.2 5 0.4 1 E2 C
106CD3 G EKC=0.0036 5$
106CD cG M from |a(K)exp
106CD G 1737.9 3 1.6 1 C
106CD cG RI other: <1.2 (1976Fl14)
106CD L 2378.2 43-
106CD E 1.19 9 0.19014 6.83 4 1.38 10
106CD2 E EAV= 1428 6$CK= 0.1189 11$CL= 0.01502 14$CM+= 0.00375 4
106CD G 1745.7 3 1.5 1 E1 C
106CD3 G EKC LT 0.00015 $
106CD cG RI other: 1.1 {I7} (1976Fl14)
106CD L 2561.33 6 0+
106CD cL E$Observed only by 2007Li07
106CD G 1928.69 5
106CD L 2566.13 142+
106CD E 5.913 1.1325 6.0210 7.0 15
106CD2 E EAV= 1340 6$CK= 0.1391 14$CL= 0.01759 17$CM+= 0.00439 5
106CD G 1933.6 1 7.6 16 C
106CD cG RI unweighted average of 9.1 {I5} (1976Hu06) and 6.0 {I7}
106CDxcG (1976Fl14)
106CD L 2600.5 ?
106CD G 495.6 2 C ?
106CD G 2600.7 2 ?
106CD L 2629.20 185- ?
106CD G 524.6 2 E1 0.0019 C
106CD G 1135.8 2 C
106CD cG RI from 1980Wi20
106CD L 2630.0 42+ ?
106CD E 1.75 9 0.35918 6.50024 2.11 10
106CD2 E EAV= 1310 6$CK= 0.1469 14$CL= 0.01859 18$CM+= 0.00463 5
106CD cE log| {Ift} inconsistent with |DJ|p requirements. Direct |e
106CD2cE feeding almost excluded. Probably an important fraction of |g's
106CD3cE deexciting higher lying levels has been missed
106CD G 1997.5 3 2.3 1 C
106CD cG E not observed by 1984Ro10
106CD cG $I|g other: 4.2 {I10} (1976Fl14)
106CD L 2719.83 22 ?
106CD E 1.80 9 0.40520 6.42823 2.20 10
106CD2 E EAV= 1269 6$CK= 0.1589 16$CL= 0.02010 20$CM+= 0.00501 5
106CD G 2087.3 2 2.4 1 C
106CD cG E other placement suggested by 1984Ro10
106CD cG RI other: 2.6 {I7} (1976Fl14)
106CD L 2824.5 2 1(-)
106CD cL E$In |e decay. Observed only by (2007Li07). Also observed in (|g,|g).
106CD2cL No |e information given by these authors.
106CD cL J$possible quadrupole-octupole coupled state with J|p=1-
106CD G 2824.5 2
106CD L 2889.44 222,1+ ?
106CD E 3.9324 1.07 7 5.97 3 5.0 3
106CD2 E EAV= 1190 6$CK= 0.1848 19$CL= 0.02340 24$CM+= 0.00583 6
106CD G 2256.87 175.4 3 C
106CD cG E$Weighted average of 2256.9 {I3} (1978Hu06 and 2256.8 {I3} (2007Li07)
106CD cG RI other: 4.9 {I9} (1976Fl14)
106CD G 2889.5 3
106CD cG E$Observed only by 2007Li07; I|g(2256|g)/I|g(2889|g)=100/31 (2007Li07)
106CD L 2917.6 2 1(+)
106CD E 3.6517 1.03 5 5.97723 4.68 21
106CD2 E EAV= 1176 6$CK= 0.1897 20$CL= 0.02402 25$CM+= 0.00599 6
106CD G 1122.4 2 (M1)
106CD cG I|g(1122|g)/I|g(1201|g)/I|g(2285|g)/I|g(2918|g)=4/2/22/100
106CDxcG (2007Li07)
106CD cG E,M$from 2007Li07
106CD G 1201.0 1 M1+E2 +0.17 11
106CD cG E,M,MR$from 2007Li07
106CD G 2284.8 2 0.9 1 M1+E2 +0.045 46 C
106CD cG E,M,MR$From 2007Li07
106CD cG RI other: 1.6 {I4} (1976Fl14)
106CD G 2918.2 3 4.2 2
106CD cG RI other: 3.8 {I7} (1976Fl14)
106CD L 2920.10 245 B ?
106CD G 1426.5 2 C
106CD cG E Observed only by 1984Ro10
106CD L 2937.2 2+,3+ ?
106CD G 2304.6 6 0.5 1 C ?
106CD cG E not observed by 1984Ro10
106CD cG RI other: 1.4 {I6} (1976Fl14)
106CD L 3118.9 2 1+
106CD E 1.2110 0.44 4 6.30 4 1.65 13
106CD2 E EAV= 1083 5$CK= 0.2286 24$CL= 0.0290 3$CM+= 0.00722 8
106CD G 553.0 2
106CD cG $I|g(553)/I|g(557)/I|g(748)/I|g(1324)/I|g(1402)/I|g(2486)/
106CD2cG I|g(3118)= 12/4/15/3/7/100/96 (2007Li07)
106CD cG E$From 2007Li07
106CD G 557.8 2 M1
106CD cG E,M$From 2007Li07
106CD G 748.5 1
106CD cG E$From 2007Li07
106CD G 1324.0 2 M1
106CD cG E,M$From 2007Li07
106CD G 1402.6 2
106CD cG E$From 2007Li07
106CD G 2486.6 6 1.1 1 M1+E2 -0.87 7 C
106CD cG E,M,MR$From 2007Li07
106CD cG RI other: 2.4 {I8} (1976Fl14)
106CD G 3118.8 1 0.7 1 M1
106CD cG E,M$From 2007Li07
106CD L 3222.3 3
106CD cL E$From 2007Li07. Observed only by 2007Li07. No information on |e
106CD2cL branchings
106CD G 1427.2 2
106CD cG E$From 2007Li07
106CD G 2590.5 3
106CD cG E$From 2007Li07
106CD G 3222 3
106CD cG E$From 2007Li07
106CD L 3328.1 51,2+ ?
106CD E 0.31 7 0.15 4 6.7110 0.46 10
106CD2 E EAV= 987 5$CK= 0.278 3$CL= 0.0353 4$CM+= 0.00880 10
106CD G 980.7 4 0.5 1
106CD cG E different placement given by 1984Ro10
106CD G 2696.8 5 1.0 11 ?
106CD cG E not observed by 1984Ro10
106CD cG RI From (1978Hu06). Other: 0.8 {I5} (1976Fl14)
106CD L 3427.3 2,3+,4+ ?
106CD G 2794.7 5 0.9 1 C ?
106CD cG E not observed by 1984Ro10
106CD cG RI other: 0.7 {I5} (1976Fl14)
106CD L 3494.6 41,2+
106CD E 2.23 9 1.35 6 5.70721 3.58 14
106CD2 E EAV= 910 5$CK= 0.326 4$CL= 0.0414 5$CM+= 0.01031 11
106CD G 2862.1 5 1.6 1 C
106CD cG RI other: 0.9 {I5} (1976Fl14)
106CD G 3494.5 5 2.3 1