106PD 106AG EC DECAY (8.28 D) 1973IN08,1975SC38,1977TI0108NDS 200806
106PD H TYP=FUL$AUT=D. DE FRENNE AND A. NEGRET$CIT=NDS 109, 943 (2008)$
106PD2 H CUT=1-May-2007$
106PD c 1973In08: activity from {+103}Rh(|a,n) E=14 MeV, chem. Measured: E|g,
106PD2c I|g, ce deduced: {+106}Pd levels, J|p, mult
106PD c 1975Sc38: activity from {+106}Pd(d,2n) E=20 MeV, natural target;
106PD2c measured: I|g(|q) polarized nuclei oriented at low T. Deduced:
106PD3c {+106}Pd levels, J|p, |d
106PD c 1977Ti01: activity from {+107}Ag(|g,n) E=30 MeV bremsstrahlung, natural
106PD2c target. Measured: I|g, |g|g(|q). Deduced: |d
106PD c Others: 1950Me86, 1955Al44, 1960Ro12, 1963Sm06, 1967Ra11, 1967St10,
106PD2c 1967Te03, 1967Ba33, 1967Vr06, 1968Mo02, 1968Ta01, 1968We16, 1971Az02,
106PDxc 1974HeYW, 1975Sh28, 1975Si13
106PD c |g|g mainly from 1977Ti01 semi-semi spectra.
106PD2c Others: 1960Ro12, 1967Ba33, 1967Ra11, 1971Az02
106PD c Q(|e)=3053 {I3} deduced from L/K capture ratios to 2952 and 2757
106PD2c states (1978Ge01)
106PD cE |b{++} unobserved (<0.1%) 1953Be42 (scin)
106PD cG E,RI Taken from 1973In08, except where noted otherwise
106PD cG |a(K)exp=ce(K)/I|g normalized to |a(K)(511.8|g)=0.00484 {I7}
106PD2cG (E2 theory). I(ce(K)) data are primarily from 1973In08 (s), otherwise
106PD3cG from 1964Sc15 (s); I(ce(L)) data are from 1987KrZQ.
106PD4cG Others: 1955Al44, 1961Sm04, 1963Sm06, 1975Sh28, 1978Sh25
106PD cG M From |a(K)exp, K:L1:L2:L3, |g(|q) or |g|g(|q) data
106PD cG MR From |g(|q) or |g|g(|q) data
106PD cL J From adopted levels
106AG P 89.66 7 6+ 8.28 D 2 2965 3
106PD N 0.0877 5 1.0 1.0
106PD cN NR for |SI(|g+ce)=100 to g.s.; IT decay unobserved
106PD G 69.0 4 5.9 16
106PD G 70.3 3 10.4 16
106PD G 80.1 2 3.9 8
106PD G 83.2 6 0.9 5
106PD G 986.8 4 0.04 LT
106PD G 1690.2 4 0.41 7
106PD cG RI other: 0.38 {I6} (1977Ti01)
106PD G 1909.1 6 0.15 5
106PD cG RI other: 0.17 {I5} (1977Ti01)
106PD G 2077.3 8 0.025 15
106PD cG RI authors report 0.02 {I+2-1}. Other: <0.05 (1977Ti01)
106PD L 0.0 0+ STABLE
106PD L 511.85 3 2+
106PD G 511.85 3 1000 30 E2 C
106PD cG E other: 511.8605 {I31} (1976Sh25, {+106}Ru source) semi,
106PD2cG relative to E(|g{+|+})=511.0034 {I14}
106PD cG RI |g{+|+} is negligible; unobserved |b{++}<0.1% (1953Be42)
106PD L 1128.04 4 2+
106PD G 616.17 3 246 7 E0+M1+E2 -9.4 20 C
106PDS G KC=0.00290 $LC=0.00036
106PD3 G EKC=0.00307 15
106PD cG EKC Weighted average of 0.00306 {I14} (1973In08) and 0.00308
106PD2cG {I14} (1990Ka35)
106PD cG M from electron conversion data of 1990Ka35
106PD cG MR from 1977Ti01. Other: -10 {I+4-2} from |g(|q) (1975Sc38);
106PD2cG -14 {I8} or -0.53 {I6} from NMR on oriented nuclei (1984Ed02);
106PD3cG or 14 {I+17-4} from 1990Ka35.
106PD cG $L1:L2:L3=100:8.5 8:6.0 7 (1978Sh25)
106PD cG |r(E0)=0.16 {I8} (1990Ka35)
106PD G 1128.02 7 134 6 E2 C
106PDS G KC=0.00067
106PD3 G EKC=0.00072 12
106PD L 1229.33 4 4+
106PD G 717.34 9 330 9 E2 C
106PDS G KC=0.00195 $LC=0.00024
106PD3 G EKC=0.00197 13
106PD cG MR |<0.005 {I10} (1977Ti01) |g|g(|q)
106PD L 1557.71 4 3+
106PD G 328.463 23 13.0 6 E2(+M1) 0.022
106PDS G KC=0.019 $LC=0.0026 $MC=0.0004
106PD3 G EKC=0.0198 18
106PD cG M |d>2.3 from |a(K)exp
106PD cG $L1:L2:L3=100:22 13:8 5 (1978Sh25)
106PD G 429.646 22 150 4 M1+E2 -7.9 8 0.00938 C
106PDS G KC=0.00813 $LC=0.00106 $MC=0.00020
106PD3 G EKC=0.0085 6
106PD cG MR weighted average: -7.4 {I7} from |g(|q) (1975Sc38) and -9
106PD2cG {I1} from NMR on oriented nuclei (1984Ed02)
106PD cG $L1:L2:L3=100:13 4:5.8 15 (1978Sh25)
106PD G 1045.83 8 337 11 M1+E2 -3.8 4 C
106PDS G KC=0.00080
106PD3 G EKC=0.00088 6
106PD cG MR weighted average of: -4.7 {I8}, -5.5 {I15}, -2.4 {I8} from
106PD2cG |g|g(|q) (1977Ti01) and -3.8 {I3} from NMR on oriented nuclei
106PDxcG (1984Ed02)
106PD cG $L1:L2:L3=100:4.4 16:1.5 9 (1978Sh25)
106PD L 1561.9 3 2+
106PD G 1050.6 5 3.0 15(M1+E2) +0.24 1
106PD cG M |D|p=no from decay scheme
106PD cG MR from 1977Ok03. Others: +0.20 {I2} (1968We16), +0.19 {I2}
106PD2cG (1968Ha35), +0.21 {I1} (1953Kl51), +0.30 {I7} (1975Hs02)
106PD L 1932.25 6 4+
106PD G 374.46 13 3.0 4 M1(+E2) 0.0 +3-0 0.0126
106PDS G KC=0.00207 $LC=0.00025 $
106PD3 G EKC=0.0089 18
106PD G 703.11 8 51 2 M1+E2 -2.30 2 C
106PDS G KC=0.00207 $LC=0.00025
106PD3 G EKC=0.0016 3$
106PD cG |a(K)exp: other: 0.00202 {I24} (1990Ka35)
106PD cG MR from 1977Ti01; others: -1.1 {I4} (1975Sc38); -1.7 {I11}
106PDxcG (1984Ed02)
106PD G 804.28 10 141 6 E2 C
106PDS G KC=0.00146 $LC=0.00018
106PD3 G EKC=0.00138 16
106PD cG M E2 consistent with isotropic |g|g(|q) A{-2}=0.002 {I6}
106PDxcG (1977Ti01)
106PD G 1419.4 8 0.4 2
106PD cG RI other: 0.12 {I8} (1977Ti01)
106PD L 2076.50 5 6+
106PD E 1.3 7 8.0224 1.3 7
106PDS E CK= 0.8623$CL= 0.1108$CM+= 0.02696
106PD G 847.03 4 32 7 E2 C
106PDS G KC=0.00129 $LC=0.00015
106PD cG |a(K)exp(doublet)=0.0014 {I4}
106PD cG E from 1978IdZZ
106PD cG RI doublet I|g(848|g)=50 {I2} (1973In08) minus I|g=18 {I6}
106PD2cG component via 4+, 2077.4-keV state
106PD cG M |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I4} for 847|g doublet is consistent with
106PD2cG mult (847.03|g)=M1,E2 and with mult (841.27|g)=M1,E2 or possibly E1.
106PD3cG The placement in the decay scheme requires mult=E2 and |D|p=no,
106PDxcG respectively
106PD L 2076.98 5 4+
106PD G 847.27 2 18 6 (M1,E2) C
106PD cG E from 1978IdZZ
106PD cG RI |g|g measurement (1977Ti01); other:
106PD2cG I|g(847.27|g)=I|g(847.43|g) (1978IdZZ) suggests component I|g=25
106PD cG M |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I4} for 847|g doublet is consistent with
106PD2cG mult (847.03|g)=M1,E2 and with mult (841.27|g)=M1,E2 or possibly E1.the
106PD3cG placement in the decay scheme requires mult=E2 and |D|p=no,
106PDxcG respectively
106PD cG From |a(K)exp=0.0014 {I4} for 847|g doublet M1 or E2 most
106PD2cG likely although E1 cannot be excluded
106PD G 949.52 25 2.2 4
106PD G 1565.4 3 5.5 5 C
106PD L 2084.06 5 3-
106PD G 522.3 3 1.0 2
106PD G 956.22 23 5.4 9
106PD G 1572.35 15 75 6 E1 C
106PD cG |d=0.00 {I+5-1} (1977Ti01) |g|g(|q)
106PD3 G EKC=0.00020 5
106PD G 2084.0 4 0.26 5 [E3]
106PD cG RI from 1977Ti01; others: 0.34 {I11} (1978IdZZ), 0.19 {I15}
106PD2cG (1973In08), 0.20 {I6} (1968Mo02), 0.31 (1967Ra11)
106PD L 2282.80 5 4+
106PD G 1053.77 21 11.0 16
106PD G 1771.1 3 0.46 8
106PD cG RI other: 0.51 {I7} (1977Ti01)
106PD L 2305.75 5 4-
106PD G 221.701 15 75 3 M1+E2 -0.11 2 0.0441 2 C
106PDS G KC=0.03813 15$LC=0.00463 3$MC=0.00087 $NC+=0.00016
106PD3 G EKC=0.041 4
106PD cG MR weighted average of: -0.13 {I2} from |g(|q) oriented nuclei
106PD2cG (1975Sc38); -0.08 {I8} from |g|g(|q) (1977Ti01) and -0.08 {I2} from
106PD3cG NMR on oriented nuclei (1984Ed02)
106PD cG $L1:L2:L3=100:7.6 4:4.2 2 (1978Sh25)
106PD G 228.633 21 24.0 11 E1 0.0145 C
106PDS G KC=0.01273 $LC=0.00150 $MC=0.00028
106PD3 G EKC=0.0135 15$EL1C=0.0012 4$EL2C=0.00008 2$EL3C=0.00015 3$
106PD cG $L1:L2:L3=100:7.1 18:11.6 17 (1978Sh25)
106PD G 748.36 11 235 7 E1 C
106PDS G KC=0.00067
106PD3 G EKC=0.00060 11
106PD cG M |d=+0.03 {I10} (1977Ti01) from |g|g(|q) overlaps zero
106PD G 1077.2 5 0.6 2
106PD cG RI other: 0.7 {I1} (1977Ti01)
106PD G 1178.07 21 1.3 3
106PD cG RI other: 2.2 {I3} (1977Ti01)
106PD G 1794.0 3 0.43 17
106PD cG RI other: 0.37 {I9} (1977Ti01)
106PD L 2350.69 5 4+
106PD G 418.55 23 3.8 7
106PD G 793.17 10 67 3 M1+E2 -7.5 15 C
106PDS G KC=0.00152 $LC=0.00018
106PD3 G EKC=0.0017 3
106PD cG MR weighted average: -7.0 {I20} from |g(|q) (1975Sc38); -4.3
106PD2cG {I15} from |g|g(|q) (1977Ti01) and -8.0 {I20} from NMR on oriented
106PD3cG nuclei (1984Ed02)
106PD G 1121.59 18 6.5 7
106PD G 1222.88 12 80 4 E2 C
106PDS G KC=0.00057
106PD3 G EKC=0.00061 13
106PD cG M Q from |g|g(|q) (1977Ti01); E2 from |a(K)exp and
106PD2cG |d(M3/E2)=+0.2 {I3} overlaps zero
106PD G 1839.05 10 23 3 E2 C
106PD3 G EKC=0.00030 7
106PD L 2365.84 5 5+
106PD G 433.9 5 1.0 4
106PD G 808.36 11 46 5 M1+E2 +1.0 8 C
106PDS G KC=0.00152 7$LC=0.00018
106PD3 G EKC=0.0013 3
106PD cG MR taken from 1977Ti01. M1 fraction impossible if J|p(2365)=5+
106PD2cG and J|p(1557)=3+
106PD G 1136.85 19 2.6 3
106PD L 2397.6 3 (5)-
106PD E 0.10 3 8.7713 0.10 3
106PDS E CK= 0.8596$CL= 0.1129$CM+= 0.02754
106PD G 1168.25 25 1.1 3 E1+M2 -0.04 2
106PD cG RI other: 1.1 {I2} (1977Ti01)
106PD cG M$D+Q from |g|g(|q). E1+M2 from linear pol in {+96}Zr({+13}C,3n|g)
106PD cG MR from 1976Gr12
106PD L 2578.8 (4-) ?
106PD G 1349.5 6 1.4 5 [E1] ?
106PDS G KC=0.00022
106PD L 2756.85 5 5+ 3.6 NS LT
106PD cL T <3.6 ns (K| x ray)(|g)(t) scin (1968We16)
106PD E 92 3 5.08718 92 6
106PDS E CK= 0.8492$CL= 0.12098 16$CM+= 0.02984 5
106PD cE |eL/|eK exp=0.1457 {I10} (1978Ge01) via (1528|g)(x-ray)
106PD2cE and I(x-ray) + I(Auger) measurements
106PD G 178.2 5 0.6 2 ?
106PD G 391.035 26 42 2 E2+M1
106PDS G KC=0.01083 $LC=0.00143 $MC=0.00027
106PD cG $|a(K)exp=0.0109 {I9} and also 0.00104 {I9} (1990Ka35)
106PD cG |d|?-16 from |g(|q) (1975Sc38);
106PD2cG |?-33 or -1.7 {I6} from NMR on
106PD3cG oriented nuclei (1984Ed02)
106PD G 406.182 20 153 4 M1+E2 -3.35 14 0.0110 C
106PDS G KC=0.00950 $LC=0.00124 $MC=0.00023
106PD3 G EKC=0.0095 6
106PD cG MR weighted average: -3.2 {I2} from |g(|q) (1975Sc38) and -3.5
106PD2cG {I2} from NMR on oriented nuclei (1984Ed02). Other: -7 {I4} (1977Ti01)
106PD cG $L1:L2:L3=100:20 4:12 2 (1978Sh25)
106PD G 450.976 22 322 8 E1 0.00243 C
106PDS G KC=0.00213 $LC=0.00025
106PD3 G EKC=0.00220 15$EL1C=0.00026 4 (1987KaZQ)$EL2C=0.000010 5 (1987KaZQ)$
106PD G 474.06 3 10.6 6 M1+E2
106PDS G KC=0.00602 $LC=0.00076 $MC=0.00014
106PD3 G EKC=0.0055 19
106PD cG MR -4.0 {I+9-6} or -0.10 {I+4-10} (1975Sc38)
106PD G 679.64 2 7.3 4 [M1,E2]
106PD cG E doublet decomposed by 1978IdZZ
106PD cG RI from doublet I|g=24.9 {I9} (1973In08) and
106PD2cG I|g(680.4|g)/I|g(679.6|g)=2.4 {I1} (1978IdZZ)
106PD cG M |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I3} for the 680 doublet consistent with
106PD2cG mult(679.64|g)=E1 and mult(680.42|g)=M1,E2. Placement in the decay
106PD3cG scheme |D|p=no for both placements.This requirement leads to
106PD4cG |S I(ce(K))=0.057 {I4}, compared with |SI(ce(K))exp=0.042 {I6}
106PD G 680.42 1 17.6 9 M1,E2
106PD cG |a(K)(M1)=0.0024; |a(K)(E2)=0.0022
106PD cG |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I3} doublet
106PD cG RI from doublet I|g=24.9 {I9} (1973In08) and
106PD2cG I|g(680.4|g)/I|g(679.6|g)=2.4 {I1} (1978IdZZ)
106PD cG M |a(K)exp=0.0017 {I3} for the 680 doublet consistent with
106PD2cG mult(679.64|g)=E1 and mult(680.42|g)=M1,E2. Placement in the decay
106PD3cG scheme |D|p=no for both placements. This requirement leads to
106PD4cG |S I(ce(K))=0.057 {I4}, compared with |SI(ce(K))exp=0.042 {I6}
106PD G 824.69 7 175 5 M1+E2 -6.5 6
106PDS G KC=0.00138 $LC=0.00016
106PD3 G EKC=0.00150 15
106PD cG MR weighted average: -5.7 {I+13-8} from |g(|q) 1975Sc38 and
106PD2cG -6.8 {I6} from NMR on oriented nuclei (1984Ed02). Other: -0.04 {I+2-4}
106PDxcG (1975Sc38)
106PD G 1199.39 10 128 6 E2 C
106PDS G KC=0.00059
106PD3 G EKC=0.00064 12
106PD G 1527.65 19 186 15 M1+E2 -2.46 9 C
106PD3 G EKC=0.00039 6
106PD cG M$D+Q from |g|g(|q). M1+E2 from linear pol in {+96}Zr({+13}C,3n|g)
106PD cG MR weighted average: -2.3 {I2} from |g(|q) (1975Sc38); -2.5 {I1}
106PD2cG from NMR on oriented nuclei (1984Ed02) and -2.3 {I8} from |g|g(|q)
106PDxcG (1977Ti01)
106PD L 2951.84 6 5+ 2.0 NS LT
106PD cL T <2.0 ns (K| x ray)(|g)(t) scin (1968We16); other: 200 ns
106PDxcL {I50} (1967Ba33)
106PD E 8.1 6 5.08 5 8.1 6
106PDS E CK= 0.802 3$CL= 0.1578 21$CM+= 0.0404 7
106PD cE |eL/|eK exp=0.203 {I3} (1978Ge01) via (1723|g)(x-ray)
106PD2cE and I(x-ray) + I(Auger) measurements
106PD G 195.05 16 3.5 5 M1(+E2) 0.13 +22-130.061
106PD cG |a(K)(M1)=0.053, |a(K)(E2)=0.108
106PD3 G EKC=0.061 12
106PD G 585.97 10 5.0 11 M1,E2
106PD cG |a(K)(M1)=0.0034, |a(K)(E2)=0.0033
106PD3 G EKC=0.0046 14
106PD G 601.17 7 18.4 10 M1+E2 -3.0 7
106PDS G KC=0.00310 $LC=0.00038
106PD3 G EKC=0.0025 3 (1973In08)$EL1C=0.0007315 (1987KaZQ)$
106PDX G EL2C=0.00007 2 (1987KaZQ)
106PD cG MR from 1975Sc38; in analogy with |d(406|g)=-3.2 (J=5+ to 4+)
106PD G 646.03 5 16.6 11 E1 0.00106
106PDS G KC=0.00092 $LC=0.00011
106PD3 G EKC=0.00055 18$
106PD G 874.81 18 3.8 5
106PD G 1019.72 15 11.9 18 M1,E2
106PD cG |a(K)(M1)=0.00095, |a(K)(E2)=0.00036
106PD3 G EKC=0.0011 3
106PD G 1394.35 14 17 2 [E2] C
106PDS G KC=0.00043
106PD3 G EKC=0.00049 6
106PD G 1722.76 18 16 2 (M1+E2) -2.5 14 C
106PD cG MR from 1977Ti01; by analogy to |d(1528|g)=-2.3 (J=5+ to 4+)
106PD2cG M1+E2 is suggested
106PD3 G EKC=0.00027 10