102RU 102RH EC DECAY (3.742 Y) 1969GE02,1970SI13 09NDS 200908
102RU H TYP=FUL$AUT=D. DE FRENNE$CIT=NDS 110, 1745 (2009)$CUT=31-Dec-2008$
102RU c Some |g-rays, observed by 1970Hu02 only, are summation
102RU2c peaks and therefore, have been omitted.
102RU c Because of the many close-lying doublets, the internal conversion
102RU2c data of 1968Ad02 and 1961Hi06 are not included.
102RU c Coincidence measurements by 1969Ko24 and 1970Ta03 are summarized
102RU2c on the decay scheme.
102RU c Others: 1965Ro09, 1971Fr12
102RU cE IE(E) Only upper limit can be given, because of uncertainties
102RU2cE in |g-intensities.
102RU CG E,RI$|g-ray energies and intensities are from 1969Ge02, unless
102RU2CG noted otherwise.
102RU CG RI(F) Uncertainty given by the evaluator. The value given in the
102RU2CG paper seems to be a misprint.
102RU CG M,MR$|g-multipolarities and mixing ratios are from
102RU2CG |g|g(|q) results of 1970Si13, unless noted otherwise.
102RU CG E(A) Observed by 1969Ko24 only
102RU CL J$From adopted levels
102RU CL E$ From a least-squares procedure using gammas given in the data set
102RH P 140 6(+) 3.742 Y 10 2323 5
102RU N 1.0 1.0 1.0
102RU cN NR Normalization to absolute |g-intensities is based on
102RU2cN assumption that there is no direct |b{+-} feeding to the {+102}Ru g.s.
102RU PN 1.0 1.0 5
102RU L 0 0+
102RU L 475.07 4 2+
102RU G 475.06 4 95 4 C
102RU L 1103.14 5 2+
102RU CL J (628)(475)(|q) is consistent with J(D+Q)2(Q)0 for
102RU2CL J(1103 level)=2 and |d(628|g)=60 {I20}. Not consistent with J=0,1,3,4
102RU3CL for any |d (1970Si13)
102RU G 628.05 5 8.3 4 E2(+M1)+E0-60 20 C
102RU CG M from |a(K)exp=2.58|*10{+-3} {I11} (1993Fa11)
102RU G 1103.16 6 4.6 3 E2 C
102RU CG M from |a(K)exp=6.27|*10{+-4} {I30} (1993Fa11)
102RU L 1106.36 6 4+
102RU E 4 LE 9.7GE E ?
102RU2 E CK= 0.8657$CL= 0.1083$CM+= 0.02555
102RU G 631.29 5 56 2 E2 C
102RU CG M from |a(K)exp=2.43|*10{+-3} {I10} (1993Fa11)
102RU L 1521.67 7 3+
102RU CL J (1049)(475)(|q) is consistent with J(D+Q)2(Q)0 for
102RU2CL J(1521 level)=3 and |d(1047|g)=-7.0 {I6}. Not consistent with J=1 or 2
102RU3CL for any |d. (419)(1103)(|q) is consistent with J(D+Q)2(Q)0
102RU4CL J(1521 level)=3 and |d(419|g)=-7.2 {I1}. Not consistent with J=1 or 2
102RU5CL for any |d (1970Si13)
102RU G 415.25 152.1 3 C
102RU G 418.52 189.4 10E2+M1 -7.2 10 FC
102RU G 1046.59 7 34 2 E2+M1 -5.7 3 C
102RU CG MR from 1989Hi12.
102RU2CG other: -7.0 {I6} (1970Si13)
102RU L 1798.76 144+
102RU E 0.8 4 9.6922
102RU2 E CK= 0.8609$CL= 0.1124$CM+= 0.02666 3
102RU G 692.4 2 1.6 2
102RU G 695.6 3 2.9 4
102RU G 1323.6 5 0.46 8 C
102RU L 1873.22 8 6+
102RU CL J J=5 deduced by 1970Si13 from triple cascade angular
102RU2CL correlation disagrees with adopted value
102RU E 35 2 7.91 3
102RU2 E CK= 0.8594$CL= 0.11363 14$CM+= 0.02700 4
102RU G 75.6 5 0.21 9 A ?
102RU G 766.84 6 34 2 C
102RU L 2219.17 7 5+
102RU CL J |g|g(|q) data are consistent with J=3 or 5, not
102RU2CL consistent with J=4 (1970Si13)
102RU E 67 3 6.21 8
102RU2 E CK= 0.813 6$CL= 0.150 5$CM+= 0.0370 12
102RU G 345.89 120.87 10 C
102RU G 420.4 2 3.2 3
102RU CG M |a(K)exp=5.8|*10{+-3} {I14} (1993Fa11)
102RU G 697.49 8 44 2 E2 C
102RU G 1112.84 7 19 1 E2+M1 -1.1 +6-9 C