102AG 102CD EC DECAY 1991KE08,1970HN02 09NDS 200908
102AG H TYP=FUL$AUT=D. DE FRENNE$CIT=NDS 110, 1745 (2009)$CUT=31-Dec-2008$
102AG c 1991Ke08: source: mass separated spallation source produced at ISOLDE
102AG2c (CERN), also by fusion evaporation reactions using an on-line mass
102AG3c separator at GSI. Measured: E|b, I|b, E|g, I|g, X|g and |g|g-coin,
102AG4c Ice, |a. Deduced: {+102}Ag levels J, |p, Q(|b{++})
102AG c 1970Hn02: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, Ice, |a; isotopically separated
102AG2c samples.
102AG c Others: 1966Bu05, 1969Ha03, 1970Hn03, 1976CoYX, 1977CoZT
102AG c Absolute |a(K) values were determined by simultaneously measuring ce
102AG2c and |g spectra (1970Hn02)
102AG cE |b-branches were deduced from total |g-ray transition
102AG2cE intensities assuming no |b-feeding either to the g.s. or to 9.3-keV
102AG3cE isomer.
102AG CG Normalization from sum of I(|g+ce) to g.s. + 9.3 level=100
102AG CG E,RI$From 1991Ke08, unless noted otherwise
102AG CG CC Theoretical total conversion coefficients (BRICC) were used
102AG2CG for calculating I(|e+|b{++}). These coefficients corresponded to the
102AG3CG multipolarity indicated.
102AG CG |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp from (1991Ke08), K:(L+M) from (1970Hn02)
102AG CG M Deduced from |a(K)exp, |a(L)exp and K:(L+M) ratios. Possible
102AG2CG multipolarities, which can be ruled out based on the decay scheme, are
102AG3CG omitted
102AG CL E$From a least-squares procedure using measured gammas
102AG CL T$From Adopted levels
102AG CL J$From Adopted levels.
102CD P 0 0+ 5.5 M 5 2587 8
102AG N 0.60 2 1.0 1.0
102AG cN No g.s. decay was assumed
102AG PN 0.60 2 1.0 3
102AG L 0 5(+) 12.9 M 3
102AG L 9.40 72+ 7.7 M 5 M1
102AG CL E the position of this level was deduced from |g-ray energy
102AG2CL differences of |g-rays ordered according to |g|g-coincidence results
102AG3CL (1991Ke08).
102AG G 9.40 8 (M3) 1.2E7 5 S
102AG L 97.45 54(+)
102AG G 97.46 5 5.9 3 M1 0.451 7 C
102AG2 G KC= 0.3916 $LC= 0.0487 $MC=0.00927 $NC+=0.0016 $
102AG2 G EKC=0.51 12$ELC=0.058 9$
102AGS G K/(L+M) GT 3
102AG L 125.54 102+,3+
102AG G 28 0.06 LT ?
102AG CG RI from |g|g data
102AG G 116.13 8 10.9 6 M1 0.276 4 C
102AG2 G KC= 0.2395 $LC= 0.0297 $MC=0.00565 $NC+=0.0016 $
102AG3 G EKC=0.25 3$ ELC=0.030 4$
102AG3 G K/(L+M)=6 2$
102AG L 156.49 63+
102AG G 59.05 5 2.4 1 M1 1.89 C
102AG2 G KC= 1.642 $LC= 0.2057 $MC= 0.0392 $NC+=0.00677 $
102AG3 G EKC=1.5 2 $
102AG3 G K/(L+M)=6.2 8$
102AG G 147.09 100.87 12M1+E2 C
102AG CG MR$No MR given by (1970Hn02)
102AG2 G EKC=0.22 3$ELC=0.037 9$
102AG2 G KC= 0.2104 $LC= 0.03592 $MC= 0.00694 $NC+=0.00115 $
102AG G 156.1 3 0.40 15
102AG L 369.98 82+
102AG G 213.50 9 7.5 7 M1 0.0526 C
102AG2 G EKC=0.0506$ELC=0.0086 19$
102AG3 G K/(L+M)=5 2
102AG G 244.4 7 0.24 10 C
102AG G 360.58 105.6 3 E2 0.0171 C
102AG2 G EKC=0.0165 18$ELC=0.0020 3$
102AG2 G KC= 0.01461 $LC= 0.0020 $MC= 0.00038 $
102AG L 490.44111+
102AG E 12.1 4 51.8 15 3.799 17 63.9 18
102AGS E EAV=478 4 $CK=0.701 4 $CL=0.0888 5 $CM+=0.02195 11
102AG G 120.47 9 4.6 3 M1 0.249 C
102AG2 G EKC=0.20 3$
102AG2 G KC= 0.2163 $LC= 0.02677 $MC= 0.0051 $
102AG G 481.00 18100 3 M1,E2
102AG2 G EKC=0.0063 7
102AG2 G ELC=0.00083 11
102AG CG $KC(M1)=0.00585 9 $KC(E2)=0.00610 9
102AG CG $LC(M1)=0.000694 10 $LC(E2)=0.000791 12
102AG L 540.59131+,2+,3+
102AG E 0.21 13 1.1 7 5.5 GT 1.3 LT ?
102AGS E EAV=456 4 $CK=0.721 4 $CL=0.0914 4 $CM+=0.02260 11
102AG G 384 0.25 10
102AG G 415.05 1512.8 9 M1,E2
102AG2 G EKC=0.0095 8$ELC=0.00106 15$
102AG2 G KC= 0.0089 $LC= 0.0011 $MC= 0.00022 $
102AG G 531.20 201.7 2 M1,E2
102AG2 G EKC=0.0058 16
102AG2 G KC= 0.0046 $LC= 0.00057 $MC= 0.00011 $
102AG L 1045.59151+
102AG E 0.44 3 25.3 8 3.841 18 25.7 8
102AGS E EAV=236 4 $CK=0.8478 $CL=0.10821 13 $CM+=0.02679 4
102AG G 505.00 1512.6 9 M1,E2 C
102AG CG E placement from 1991Ke08, other placement by 1970Hn02
102AG2 G EKC=0.0048 7
102AG2 G KC= 0.0052 $LC= 0.00065 $MC= 0.00012 $
102AG G 555 3.8 LT ?
102AG G 675.65 207.0 4 C
102AG G 920 1 0.1 LT ?
102AG G 1036.1 3 23 1
102AG L 1368.6 31+
102AG E 0.0021 4 6.3 6 4.24 5 6.3 6
102AGS E EAV=95 4 $CK=0.8614 $CL=0.1108 $CM+=0.02746
102AG G 322.5 0.3 LT ?
102AG G 998.6 7 0.48 10
102AG G 1359.2 3 10 1
102AG L 1449.0 41+
102AG E 0.57 8 5.22 7 0.57 8
102AGS E CK=0.8614 $CL=0.1111 $CM+=0.02754
102AG G 1079.1 5 0.25 9
102AG G 1439.6 5 0.7 1
102AG L 1727.2 7(1+)
102AG E 0.14 5 5.58 16 0.14 5
102AGS E CK=0.8598 $CL=0.1123 $CM+=0.02789
102AG G 1717.8 7 0.23 8
102AG L 1965.4 71+
102AG E 0.36 2 4.88 3 0.36 2
102AGS E CK=0.8573 $CL=0.1142 $CM+=0.02846
102AG G 1956.0 7 0.60 3