ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS for 58Ti

Author: Balraj Singh |  Citation: ENSDF |  Cutoff date: 27-MAY-2014 

Authors: Caroline D. Nesaraja, Scott D. Geraedts and Balraj Singh |  Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 111, 897 (2010) |  Cutoff date: 12-Jan-2010 

 Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version) 


Q(β-)=9210 keV SYS(n)= 5320 keV SYS(p)= 17690 keV SYQ(α)= -8760 keV SY
Reference: 2012WA38

References:
  A  58Sc β- decay (12 MS)  B  1H(58Ti,58Ti’γ)
  C  9Be(61V,58TiG) 

General Comments:

1992We04: 9Be(86Kr,X) E=500 MeV/nucleon. Mass separation using magnetic spectrometer. Isotope identification with zero-degree magnetic spectrometer, time-of-flight and energy loss measurements.

1999So20 (also 1999Le67): 58Ti from 58Ni(86Kr,X) reaction at 60.4 MeV/nucleon. Measured Eβ, Iβ(t), isotopic half-life.

2002MaZN: Fragmentation of 86Kr beam, LISE spectrometer, measured isotopic half-life

2005Ga01 (also 2003So21): 58Ti produced in fragmentation of 76Ge30+ beam on a 58Ni target at 61.8 MeV/nucleon. LISE3 achromatic spectrometer used to separate fragments; magnetic rigidity was tuned to optimize transmission of 62V and 64Cr fragments. Transmitted nuclei were identified by three consecutive Si detectors where two were used for energy loss and time-of-flight measurements while the third was used to determine their residual energies. Measured Eγ, Iγ, Iβ, γγ, βγ coin, γ(t), lifetimes with four Ge detectors placed around a thick Si telescope. Half-lives determined by fitting procedure involving five parameters: half-lives of mother, daughter and grand-daughter nuclei, the β-efficiency and the background rate over the 1 s collecting time.

2011Da08 (also 2002MaZN thesis): 58Ti produced in fragmentation of 57.8 MeV/nucleon 86Kr beam impinged on 50 mg/cm2 thick tantalum target using LISE-2000 spectrometer at GANIL facility. Detector system included a three-element Si-detector telescope containing a double-sided silicon-strip detector (DSSSD) backed by a Si(Li) detector and surrounded by four clover type EXOGAM Ge detectors. Product identified by mass, atomic number, charge, energy loss and time of flight. Measured half-life

Theoretical nuclear structure calculations:

2014Ka03: calculated energy and B(E2) of first 2+ level

2012Ca30: calculated energy levels, J, p, electric quadrupole and dipole magnetic moments; shell model calculations

2006Ma23: calculated levels, spins and parities. Shell-model.

2008Gu03: calculated potential energy surfaces and g.s. deformation

Q-value: Estimated uncertainties (2012Wa38): ΔQ(β-)=420, ΔS(n)=470, ΔS(p)=ΔQ(α)=640

Q-value: S(2n)=8050 420, S(2p)=31790 720, Q(β-n)=5050 460 (2012Wa38,syst)









E(level)
(keV)
XREFJπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)
(keV)
I(γ)Final Levels
     0.0ABC 0+ 58 ms 9 
% β- = 100
% β-n = ?
    
  1047 4  BC 2+     1047 4 
  100
     0.0
0+
  2038 6   C (4+)      991 4 
 
  1047
2+
  2423 18 ? B  (LE 3)     1376 18 ?
 
  1047
2+
  2657 7   C (6+)      619 5 
 
  2038
(4+)
  2881 27  B  (LE 3)     1835 27 
 
  1047
2+

Back to top

Back to top

Additional Level Data and Comments:

E(level)Jπ(level)T1/2(level)Comments
     0.00+ 58 ms 9 
% β- = 100
% β-n = ?
Theoretical %β-n=1.1 (1997Mo25).
  10472+   β2(p,p’)=0.18 +5-6 (2013Su20, inelastic scattering).
Jπ(level): From systematics of even-even nuclides, energy consistent with shell-model predictions (2013Su20,2014Ga07).
  2038(4+)   Jπ(level): From systematics of even-even nuclides, energy consistent with shell-model predictions (2013Su20,2014Ga07).
  2423(LE 3)   Jπ(level): No assignment has been proposed in 2013Su20, but it is unlikely that a level of spin higher than 3 is populated in (p,p’) scattering. As discussed by 2014Ga07, this is the possibly the reason that (4+) and (6+) levels reported in (61V,58Tiγ) reaction were not seen in the 1H(58Ti,58Ti’) study.
  2657(6+)   Jπ(level): From systematics of even-even nuclides, energy consistent with shell-model predictions (2013Su20,2014Ga07).
  2881(LE 3)   Jπ(level): No assignment has been proposed in 2013Su20, but it is unlikely that a level of spin higher than 3 is populated in (p,p’) scattering. As discussed by 2014Ga07, this is the possibly the reason that (4+) and (6+) levels reported in (61V,58Tiγ) reaction were not seen in the 1H(58Ti,58Ti’) study.

Back to top