ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS for 46Cl

Author: Balraj Singh |  Citation: ENSDF |  Cutoff date: 31-AUG-2012 

Author: S. -c. Wu |  Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 91, 1 (2000) |  Cutoff date: 15-Jul-2000 

 Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version) 


Q(β-)=1.592×104 keV 17S(n)= 3.52×103 keV 19S(p)= 1.71×104 keV 7Q(α)= -1.72×104 keV 3
Reference: 2012WA38

References:
  A  9Be(48K,xγ) 

General Comments:

46Cl observed from interaction of a 48Ca beam of 55 MeV/u with a tantalum target, and a 48Ca beam of 60 MeV/u with a 64Ni target using magnetic separation and identification through time-of-flight and ΔE-E measurements (1989Gu03,1993So06) at GANIL facility.

2004Gr20 (also 2003Gr22): production in Be(48Ca,X) reaction at GANIL, measured half-life

Precise mass measurements: 2007Ju03, 2000Sa21 (also 2001Sa72)

Nuclear structure calculations: 2010Ga15

Q-value: Note: Current evaluation has used the following Q record 15.92×103 17 3.52×103 19 17.11×10371-17.24×10326 2011AuZZ

Q-value: Q(β-n)=7889 160, S(2n)=9348 211, S(2p)=38830 817 (syst) (2011AuZZ)









E(level)
(keV)
XREFJπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)
(keV)
I(γ)Final Levels
     0.0A (2-) 232 ms 2 
% β- = 100
% β-n = 60 9
    
   118 3 A      118 3 
  100
     0.0
(2-)
   151 3 A      151 3 
  100
     0.0
(2-)
   402 4 A      256 4 
   293 4 
   402 4 
   22 4 
   16 4 
  100 8 
   151
   118
     0.0


(2-)
  1024 5 A      636 5 
  1024 5 
  100 14 
   38 14 
   402
     0.0

(2-)

E(level): From Eγ data (2012St12)

Back to top

Back to top

Additional Level Data and Comments:

E(level)Jπ(level)T1/2(level)Comments
   402   E(level): From g.s. transition. Possible unresolved multiplet, since the energy fits of cascading γ rays are marginal.
  1024   E(level): From g.s. transition. Possible unresolved multiplet, since the energy fits of cascading γ rays are marginal.

Back to top

Additional Gamma Comments:

E(level)E(gamma)Comments
   402   256E(γ): 251 5 from level-energy difference
   293E(γ): 284 5 from level-energy difference
  1024   636E(γ): poor fit, Eγ=622 6 from level-energy difference

Back to top