List of levels for 208BI

ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS for ²⁰⁸Bi

Author: M. J. Martin | Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 108,1583 (2007) | Cutoff date: 1-Jun-2007

Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version)

Q(β-)=-1400.6 keV 24	S(n)= 6887 keV 3	S(p)= 3707.2 keV 20	Q(α)= 3051.0 keV 20
Reference: 2012WA38

References:
A	²⁰⁶Pb(α,d)	B	²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d),(α,t)
C	²⁰⁸Pb(p,nγ)	D	²⁰⁸Pb(⁴⁸Ca,xγ)
E	²⁰⁹Bi(p,d)	F	²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α)
G	²⁰⁹Bi(d,tγ)	H	²¹⁰Bi(p,t): TARGET=9- ISOMER
I	²⁰⁸Bi IT decay	J	²⁰⁸Po ε decay
K	²¹²At α decay (0.314 S)	L	²¹²At α decay (0.119 S)
M	²⁰⁷Pb(p,p’),(pol p,p’) IAR	N	²⁰⁷Pb(⁷Li,α2nγ)
O	²⁰⁸Pb(π⁺,PI0)	P	²⁰⁸Pb(p,n),(p,NP’)
Q	²⁰⁸Pb(³He,t),(³He,TP),(³He,TN)	R	²⁰⁹Bi(γ,n)
S	²⁰⁹Bi(n,2nγ)	T	²⁰⁹Bi(¹⁷O,¹⁸OG)
U	²⁰⁸Pb(⁶Li,⁶He)

E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
0.0	A B C E F G H I J K L N R S T U	5+	3.68×10⁺⁵ y 4 % ε = 100
63.02 4	A B C E F G H I J K L N R S T U	4+		63.00 6		M1(+E2)	0.0	5+
510.28 7	A C E F G H I K L N R S T U	6+	118 ps 14	447.3 1 510.15 15	4.0 11 100	[E2] E2(+M1)	63.02 0.0	4+ 5+
601.46 4	B C E F G H J K L N R S T U	4+	5.5 ps 21	538.41 6 601.49 6	51.8 11 100	M1 M1	63.02 0.0	4+ 5+
628.33 6	A B C E F G H L N S T	5+		26.91 11 118.2 2 565.23 8	0.41 5 4.2 12 100 7	M1	601.46 510.28 63.02	4+ 6+ 4+
633.14 5	A B C E F G H J K N R S T	3+		31.7 1 570.09 6 633.0 2	2.4 6 100.0 24 1.3 1	M1(+E2) M1	601.46 63.02 0.0	4+ 4+ 5+
650.57 10	A C E F G H I L N R S T	7+	> 1.0 ns	140.08 12 650.60 16	52 16 100	M1 E2	510.28 0.0	6+ 5+
886.36 8	A C E F G H K L N R S	5+	0.18 ps +8-6	823.25 14 886.4 2	100 96 9		63.02 0.0	4+ 5+
924.85 6	C E F G H J K S	2+		291.77 6 861.83 7 925.11 13 ?	100 28.8 17 <0.14	M1+E2 [E2]	633.14 63.02 0.0	3+ 4+ 5+
936.27 6	A B C H K N R S	3+	> 1.7 ps	303.1 1 873.3 2 936.3 2	1.0 1 100 3 1.7 4		633.14 63.02 0.0	3+ 4+ 5+
958.99 7	C E F G H K L N R	4+		325.74 9 330.6 2 896.0 2 959.0 2	11.6 7 4.2 9 100 6 36 3		633.14 628.33 63.02 0.0	3+ 5+ 4+ 5+
1033.26 6	A B C E F K N R S	4+	0.72 ps +26-17	146.6 2 400.0 2 431.4 2 970.25 14 1033.31 14	1.0 2 2.0 3 <0.3 41.5 8 100.0 25	M1	886.36 633.14 601.46 63.02 0.0	5+ 3+ 4+ 4+ 5+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
1069.11 6	C E F G K N R S	3+	0.44 ps +21-12	110.0 2 435.7 2 467.37 15 1006.23 15 1069.3 2	0.6 2 9.0 7 9.0 7 100 6 2.8 4	M1	958.99 633.14 601.46 63.02 0.0	4+ 3+ 4+ 4+ 5+
1095.06 14	C E F G H L N R	6+	0.13 ps +5-4	207.8? 1094.9 2			886.36 0.0	5+ 5+
1469.47 11	A C F N S	4+,5+,6+		435.9 2 841.0 3 959.0 2	18 4 9 6 100 14		1033.26 628.33 510.28	4+ 5+ 6+
1529.40 7	A C E F	3+,4+		496.1 1 592.9 2 896.2 2 927.97 15 1466.4 2 1529.4 3	100 4 17 6 44 8 98 3 59 4 28 4		1033.26 936.27 633.14 601.46 63.02 0.0	4+ 3+ 3+ 4+ 4+ 5+
1539.39 7	C N	2+,3+	> 1.2 ps	470.06 15 602.88 15 614.22 15 906.32 15 937.8 2 1476.5 2	3.0 2 20.3 12 7.4 5 100.0 6 3.0 2 12.0 8		1069.11 936.27 924.85 633.14 601.46 63.02	3+ 3+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 4+
1563.45 9	B C	3+,4+		494.1 3 529.9 2 627.13 13 677.1 2 935.2 2	1.7 10 25 8 100 20 3 1 67 14		1069.11 1033.26 936.27 886.36 628.33	3+ 4+ 3+ 5+ 5+
1571.1 4	A D E F H I S	10-	2.58 ms 4 % IT = 100	920.5 3		E3(+M4)	650.57	7+
1603 5	F
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
1624.68 11	A B C E F	6-		530.4 4 738.2 2 973.9 2 996.2 2	4.5 8 14 1 59 12 100 20		1095.06 886.36 650.57 628.33	6+ 5+ 7+ 5+
1657.47 22	C E F H	8-		1006.9 2			650.57	7+
1666.58 16	A B C	7-		1015.9 2 1156.4 2	70 40 100 40		650.57 510.28	7+ 6+
1703.35 7	C E F	5-		233.7 3 669.9 2 744.2 2 1074.9 2 1640.5 1 1703.2 2	0.30 10 6 4 26 3 9 2 100 4 32 2		1469.47 1033.26 958.99 628.33 63.02 0.0	4+,5+,6+ 4+ 4+ 5+ 4+ 5+
1715.66 19	A B C E F H	6-,7-		1064.9 2 1205.8 3	100 50 80 40		650.57 510.28	7+ 6+
1716.17 25	A B C E F H	6-,7-		621.1 2			1095.06	6+
1731 5	F
1786.1 15	E F H	9-
1802.09 8	A B C P Q	1+		262.50 15 865.84 15 877.2 2 1169.07 15	100 5 16.3 10 17.3 10 6.8 4		1539.39 936.27 924.85 633.14	2+,3+ 3+ 2+ 3+
1824.45 16	C			354.9 2 1761.5 2	100 87 11		1469.47 63.02	4+,5+,6+ 4+
1836 4	A	(5+,6+,7+)
1839.03 9	C E F	4-		135.6 2 805.6 2 879.9 2 902.9 3 952.5 3 1205.9 2 1210.9 2 1775.7 3	51 13 13 8 18 4 44 3 6.6 22 56 10 10 8 100 6	M1	1703.35 1033.26 958.99 936.27 886.36 633.14 628.33 63.02	5- 4+ 4+ 3+ 5+ 3+ 5+ 4+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
1870.77 10	C E F	3+,4+		307.0 2 331.0 2 837.7 2 934.7 2 946.0 2	7.5 18 5.5 17 100 7 69 12 15 3		1563.45 1539.39 1033.26 936.27 924.85	3+,4+ 2+,3+ 4+ 3+ 2+
1882.14 11	A B C	2+,3,4,5+		412.5 2 812.9 2 849.0 2 923.3 3 946.0 2	25 4 18.2 11 3.6 18 6 2 100 10		1469.47 1069.11 1033.26 958.99 936.27	4+,5+,6+ 3+ 4+ 4+ 3+
1919.97 7	C E F	3-		80.7 2 390.2 2 886.7 2 960.8 2 983.7 2 995.1 2 1287.0 3 1318.6 2	5 2 7.8 7 <8 9.9 11 50 3 100 7 5.4 7 31 5	M1	1839.03 1529.40 1033.26 958.99 936.27 924.85 633.14 601.46	4- 3+,4+ 4+ 4+ 3+ 2+ 3+ 4+
2077.66 8	C	0-,1-,2-		275.26 15 1141.4 2 1152.84 10	100 6 1.0 2 0.8 2	E1	1802.09 936.27 924.85	1+ 3+ 2+
2126.90 8	B C	2+,3,4+		255.7 2 597.2 2 1057.5 3 1093.4 8 1190.77 12 1202.1 2 1493.8 2	13.7 11 13 2 3.5 7 4.4 8 100 3 12.6 8 13.8 11		1870.77 1529.40 1069.11 1033.26 936.27 924.85 633.14	3+,4+ 3+,4+ 3+ 4+ 3+ 2+ 3+
2132 7	H
2160 7	H
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
2179.42 20	C	4+,5,6,7+		1083.8 4 1293.2 2			1095.06 886.36	6+ 5+
2180.04 21	C	4+,5,6,7+		1084.9 2 2180.3 4	32 7 100		1095.06 0.0	6+ 5+
2202.89 12	C	1-,2-,3-		125.3 2 663.3 2	100 51 12	M1	2077.66 1539.39	0-,1-,2- 2+,3+
2246 5	A
2308.08 9	C	2+,3,4		388.1 1 838.1 3 1239.09 12	6.2 8 4.2 12 100 3		1919.97 1469.47 1069.11	3- 4+,5+,6+ 3+
2340.1 4	C E F H	7+		1829.8 4			510.28	6+
2358.47 20	C	2+,3,4,5+		1725.2 2 1758.1 6	100 16 8		633.14 601.46	3+ 4+
2383.86 19	C E F	4+,5+		1750 1 1754.8 6 1782.5 2	53 3 16 7 100 48		633.14 628.33 601.46	3+ 5+ 4+
2385.97 15	C E F	4+,5+		856.7 3 1753.0 3 1757.6 2 1784.1 4	5 5 50 50 100 9 <220		1529.40 633.14 628.33 601.46	3+,4+ 3+ 5+ 4+
2404.2 5	C			1771.1 5			633.14	3+
2407 5	A H	9-
2409.10 18	A C E F	6+		1780.4 3 1807.5 3 1899.3 3			628.33 601.46 510.28	5+ 4+ 6+
2415.72 12	C	1+,2,3,4-		337.9 2			2077.66	0-,1-,2-
2426.7 4	B D E F H	11-		855.7 2			1571.1	10-
2436.87 19	C			873.3 2			1563.45	3+,4+
2457.38 10	C E F	3+		918.0 2 1388.6 1532.6 2 1824.13 14 1856.0 2	27 2 6.6 17 50 4 100 8 73 6		1539.39 1069.11 924.85 633.14 601.46	2+,3+ 3+ 2+ 3+ 4+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
2470 5	A H	9-
2478.49 12	C	2,3,4		275.3 2 558.5 2 1845.5 2	100 7 20.5 17		2202.89 1919.97 633.14	1-,2-,3- 3- 3+
2495.53 11	C	4,5+		293.5 5 656.2 4 792.1 2 1559.2 2 1609.1 4 1862.5 2 1894.0 3	25 2 62 5 60 5 48 4 35 12 100 8 66 6		2202.89 1839.03 1703.35 936.27 886.36 633.14 601.46	1-,2-,3- 4- 5- 3+ 5+ 3+ 4+
2501.56 11	A C E F	2+		1432.2 2 1576.7 2 1868.3 2	18 6 88 5 100 7		1069.11 924.85 633.14	3+ 2+ 3+
2513.51 10	A C	2+,3,4,5+		1444.2 2 1480.0 2 1554.5 2 1577.5 2 1880.5 4 1912.2 2	47 4 18.5 14 100 6 13.7 24 41 4 42 4		1069.11 1033.26 958.99 936.27 633.14 601.46	3+ 4+ 4+ 3+ 3+ 4+
2544.83 14	C			467.21 12			2077.66	0-,1-,2-
2554 5	H
2556.45 9	C	2,3,4		636.2 2 1487.4 1 1620.0 3 1923.3 2	42 4 100 6 23.7 15 86 6		1919.97 1069.11 936.27 633.14	3- 3+ 3+ 3+
2564.79 14	C	3+		149.4 4 1936.6 2 1963.4 3	3.9 15 100 11 <17		2415.72 628.33 601.46	1+,2,3,4- 5+ 4+
2570.31 13	C	1,2,3		154.6 2 492.6 2 1645.6 2	6 5 72 10 100 7		2415.72 2077.66 924.85	1+,2,3,4- 0-,1-,2- 2+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
2586.58 11	C	3+,4,5+		1627.4 2 1700.5 2 1953.4 2 1984.9 3 2523.5 3	59 6 71 6 64 6 21 4 100 8		958.99 886.36 633.14 601.46 63.02	4+ 5+ 3+ 4+ 4+
2605 6	A
2612.63 14	C	4+,5+		1653.6 2 1676.4 3 1979 1 2011.3 3 2102.3 3	45 3 13 3 <30 100 8 37 3		958.99 936.27 633.14 601.46 510.28	4+ 3+ 3+ 4+ 6+
2631.02 16	C	5,6,7-		928.1 3 1006.3 2 1535.8 2	60 20 100 11		1703.35 1624.68 1095.06	5- 6- 6+
2636.34 14	A C	2+,3,4,5+		1677.3 2 2003.2 3 2034.9 2	78 9 92 8 100 8		958.99 633.14 601.46	4+ 3+ 4+
2657.29 24	C			454.4 2			2202.89	1-,2-,3-
2660.7 4	C E F H	8+		2010.1 3			650.57	7+
2679.42 11	C F	1+,2,3		601.3 2 1610.4 2 1754.8 2 2046.4 2	100 5 39 9		2077.66 1069.11 924.85 633.14	0-,1-,2- 3+ 2+ 3+
2693.78 12	C F	2+,3,4,5+		149.4 4 1624.8 2 1660.9 4 1757.4 3 2060.3 3 2630.6 2	42 3 4.6 7 0.29 3 45 3 100 8		2544.83 1069.11 1033.26 936.27 633.14 63.02	3+ 4+ 3+ 3+ 4+
2718.55 12	C E F	2,3,4		798.42 15 848.7 4 1189.7 3 1649.2 3 1782.2 2	100 7 42 3 3.5 9 11.0 9 0.12 2		1919.97 1870.77 1529.40 1069.11 936.27	3- 3+,4+ 3+,4+ 3+ 3+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
2719 6	A	(6-)
2733.04 14	C			254.4 2 530.2 2 1808.3 2			2478.49 2202.89 924.85	2,3,4 1-,2-,3- 2+
2739.52 12	C	3,4,5		1114.6 2 1780.4 3 1814.9 2 1853.2 2	64 7 46 10 100 12 82 9		1624.68 958.99 924.85 886.36	6- 4+ 2+ 5+
2804 6	A	(10-)
2826 6	A	(6-,7-,8-)
2838.89 11	C	1+,2,3		268.8 3 282.2 2 423.1 1 761.3 2 1914.4 2	15.7 14 13.2 12 39 4 100 4 20 2		2570.31 2556.45 2415.72 2077.66 924.85	1,2,3 2,3,4 1+,2,3,4- 0-,1-,2- 2+
2843 7	H
2843.36 22	C			765.7 2			2077.66	0-,1-,2-
2869.57 11	C	3+,4,5,6+		2806.50 16 2869.57 15	28.0 15 100 5		63.02 0.0	4+ 5+
2879.66 15	C	2+,3,4,5+		1340.1 2 1846.6 2	59 10 100 13		1539.39 1033.26	2+,3+ 4+
2881.30 20	A C	3+,4,5+		294.6 3 1812.1 5 1994.6 6 2818.5 3	100 14 51 7		2586.58 1069.11 886.36 63.02	3+,4,5+ 3+ 5+ 4+
2884.07 16	A C E F	1+		382.5 2 1815.1 3 1959.1 3	71.0 7 100 21 71 29		2501.56 1069.11 924.85	2+ 3+ 2+
2886.77 12	A B C			330.5 2 578.7 2 2285.0 2	99 8 100 8		2556.45 2308.08 601.46	2,3,4 2+,3,4 4+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
2888.47 16	A B C			2888.45 16			0.0	5+
2893.76 13	A C E P Q	2-		973.8 2 1091.6 2 1364.1 4 1957.6 2	100 60 8 7 8 7 13 13		1919.97 1802.09 1529.40 936.27	3- 1+ 3+,4+ 3+
2903.58 16	C	0+,1,2,3+		1101.6 2 1978.9 4	100 21 4		1802.09 924.85	1+ 2+
2912 10 ?	F
2932.84 13	C	3+,4,5+		1996.4 2 2046.4 2 2331.6 2	36 2 100 7 19.7 16		936.27 886.36 601.46	3+ 5+ 4+
2942.88 16	B C	2+		2879.84 15			63.02	4+
2950.96 11	C	2+,3		873.3 2 1411.3 3 1992.3 2 2026.1 2 2317.6 2	32 2 22 2 100 8 26 8		2077.66 1539.39 958.99 924.85 633.14	0-,1-,2- 2+,3+ 4+ 2+ 3+
3049 3	E
3069.34 12	B C E F	2+		632.2 3 1267.6 2 1529.9 2 1539.7 3 2036.2 3 2132.7 3	100 6 81 11 22 8 29 7 0.39 7		2436.87 1802.09 1539.39 1529.40 1033.26 936.27	1+ 2+,3+ 3+,4+ 4+ 3+
3091 5	A H	(8)-
3114 3	E	3+,4+,5+,6+
3141 3	E	3+,4+,5+,6+
3154 5	H	-
3154.98 22	C			846.9 2			2308.08	2+,3,4
3165.93 14	C	1+,2,3,4+		262.5 2 601.4 2 664.0 2 1626.4 3			2903.58 2564.79 2501.56 1539.39	0+,1,2,3+ 3+ 2+ 2+,3+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
3171 5	A B P Q	1+
3201.1 4	D	(12+)		774.4 3 1629.9 3	100 57		2426.7 1571.1	11- 10-
3207 7	A
3212 3	E
3240 3	E
3246 7	A
3257 5	B	1+,2+
3271 3	E F	+
3286.38 9	B C	2+		1159.35 12 1757.2 2 2217.2 3 2253.1 2 2361.5 2 2652.8 4 2685.2 2	77 6 41 7 14 2 64 6 91 11 64 11 100 8		2126.90 1529.40 1069.11 1033.26 924.85 633.14 601.46	2+,3,4+ 3+,4+ 3+ 4+ 2+ 3+ 4+
3300 7	A H	-
3318 3	E F	+
3327 3	A E	4-,5-
3332 7	A H
3347 3	E	4-,5-
3351.34 20	C			738.8 4 935.7 3 1821.8 3			2612.63 2415.72 1529.40	4+,5+ 1+,2,3,4- 3+,4+
3362 3	E F	+
3379 7	A
3387 3	E F
3390.9 4	C			440.2 6 496 2 2454.6 4	24.0 10 <10 100 6		2950.96 2893.76 936.27	2+,3 2- 3+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
3407 5	B	1+,2+
3411 10	H
3412 3	E F	+
3425.08 12	C			538.2 2 545.6 4 1117.2 3 2488.9 2 2791.8 2			2886.77 2879.66 2308.08 936.27 633.14	2+,3,4,5+ 2+,3,4 3+ 3+
3427.2 4	C			862.4 3			2564.79	3+
3449.4 5	D P	(13+)		248.4 3		M1	3201.1	(12+)
3453 5	A H	-
3457 5	A B	1+,2+
3461 3	E F	+
3499.7 8	A D	(11+)		1928.6 10			1571.1	10-
3521 7	H	9-
3524 3	B E F	+
3532 5	B
3541 3	E	+
3547 7	A
3563 5	H	-
3565 3	E F	+
3600.6 5	A D	(12+)		101S 1173.9 4			3499.7 2426.7	(11+) 11-
3611 3	B E	1+,2+
3631 7	H
3662 3	E F
3688 3	E F
3718 5	E F	+
3742 3	E
3751 7	H
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
3766 3	E
3767 10	H
3795 8	A
3851 5	H
3854 8	A
3863 25	P Q	1+
3886 3	E	(+)
3905 8	A
3906 10	H
3967 8	A
4013 10	H
4015 4	E	+
4015 8	A
4043 25	Q	1+
4049 8	A
4087 10	H
4137 10	H
4156 9	A
4159.1 5	D	(13+)		558.8 8 709.7 3 957.8 5 2588 1	2.7 100 35 5.4		3600.6 3449.4 3201.1 1571.1	(12+) (13+) (12+) 10-
4183 4	E
4236 9	A
4238 5	H
4284 9	A
4291.0 5	D	(13)		690.3 4 841.7 4	70 100		3600.6 3449.4	(12+) (13+)
4357 9	A
4399 9	A
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
4448 9	A
4484.3 5	D	(14+)		325.2 3 1034.9 5	100 14		4159.1 3449.4	(13+) (13+)
4543 4	E	+
4556 4	E	+
4587 4	E	+
4617 4	E P Q	1+
4635.3 5	D	(15+)		151.0 5 475.9 6 1185.9 4	100 100 100		4484.3 4159.1 3449.4	(14+) (13+) (13+)
4652 10	A
4697?	A
4836.2 5	A D	(14-)		545.2 4 677.2 4 1336? 1386.7 4	100 38 <8 62		4291.0 4159.1 3499.7 3449.4	(13) (13+) (11+) (13+)
4885 10	A
5008 10	A
5067 10	A
5463.0 6	A D	(15-)		626.8 4 2262.0 8	100 20		4836.2 3201.1	(14-) (12+)
5552 11 ?	A
5626.6 6	D	(16-)		163.7 5 990.8 7 2178 1	100 36 9.1		5463.0 4635.3 3449.4	(15-) (15+) (13+)
5.9E+3 2	P Q	1+
7.13E+3 10	P
8.19E+3 10	P Q	1+
≈9000	D		≈ 40 ns
9.16E+3 10	P	(1)+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
9.8E+3 2	Q	1+
10.38E+3 10	P	(1)+
15165 6	M P Q	0+	231 keV 6
15.6E+3 2	P Q	1+
17780	M	3-	166 keV 47
18363	M	5-	234 keV 19
18640	M	4-	242 keV 18
18874	M	5-	195 keV 51
19085	M	4-	245 keV 67
19126	M	5-	281 keV 70
19161	M	6-	285 keV 85
19203	M	7-	277 keV 67
19216	M	3-	339 keV 54
19290	M	4-	261 keV 61
19345	M	5-	306 keV 56
19371	M	6-	226 keV 42
19395	M	2-	336 keV 72
19420	M	3-	312 keV 42
19462	M	5-	289 keV 51
19524	M	4-	319 keV 51
19646	M	6-	329 keV 78
19776	M	7+
19863	M	3-	301 keV 30
20026	M	7+
20139	M	2-	247 keV 12
20203	M	3-	262 keV 25
20292	M	2-	318 keV 16
20410	M	3-	272 keV 10
20445	M	1-	285 keV 19
20539	M	2-	290 keV 15
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
20647	M	5-	225 keV 51
20677	M	1-	291 keV 38
20860	M	5-	328 keV 76
20943	M	(2-)	298 keV 32
21039	M	3-	281 keV 20
21089	M	2-	252 keV 78
21.1E+3 80	P Q	0-,1-,2-	10 MeV 3
21112	M	1-	268 keV 19
21134	M	3-
21175	M	4-
21252	M	2-
21428	M	1-
21479	M	1-
22.90E+3 20	P	(1)+	≈ 670 keV
23500	P	0-,1-,2-	2.9 MeV
24.60E+3 20	P	(1)+	1.2 MeV
28000	P	(2)+	14 MeV

E(level): From a least-squares fit to the adopted Eγ. Energies for levels not deexcited by gammas are averages from all reactions populating the level. Note that values from (p,d), from (³He,d),(α,t), from (d,t),(³He,α) and from (p,t) have been adjusted as noted in the source datasets. Above about 2500, the association of levels seen in the different reactions, except where Jπ information is known, is uncertain. The evaluator has chosen to show separate levels in such cases. It is possible that some of these levels that overlap in energy are the same. For E(level)>15.6 MeV, energies are from ²⁰⁷Pb(p,p’),(pol p,p’). These levels are probable IAR of ²⁰⁸Pb levels. For data on the Gamow-Teller resonance at 15.6 MeV, and on resonances above 21 MeV, see ²⁰⁸Pb(³He,t),(³He,tp),(³He,tn), ²⁰⁸Pb(p,n),(p,np’), and ²⁰⁸Pb(π⁺,π⁰)

J^π(level): 2006Bo08, in (p,nγ), compare the experimental energies with a shell-model calculation (see 2006Bo08 for details). Their calculation gives agreement with the Jπ and configuration assignments for the levels seen previously in transfer reactions, and their observed γ branchings are consistent with the assignments. In addition, the authors propose assignments for five of the six members of the π2f_7/2ν2f_5/2^-1 multiplet, and three of the four members of the π2f_7/2ν3p_3/2^-1 multiplet. They suggest that the 1824 level could Be the 6⁺ member of the first of these multiplets, or the 5⁺ member of the second multiplet. Their calculations confirm the 1802 level as the 1⁺ member of the f_7/2-f_5/2 multiplet. These assignments are given in comments. Assignments for E(level)>15 MeV are from σ and analyzing power in ²⁰⁷Pb(p,p’),(pol p,p’) IAR

E(level) (keV)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	Multipolarity	Mixing Ratio	Conversion Coefficient	Additional Data
63.02	4+		63.00 6	M1(+E2)	0.14 LT	7.8	α=7.8 5
510.28	6+	118 ps 14	447.3 1	[E2]		0.0410	B(E2)(W.u.)=0.10 3, α=0.0410
510.28	6+	118 ps 14	510.15 15	E2(+M1)	1.3 GT	0.044	B(E2)(W.u.)=1.5 5, α=0.044 15
601.46	4+	5.5 ps 21	538.41 6	M1		0.0964	α=0.0964
601.46	4+	5.5 ps 21	601.49 6	M1		0.0720	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.008 +6-4, α=0.0720
633.14	3+		31.7 1	M1(+E2)	0.10 LT	62	α=62 7
633.14	3+		570.09 6	M1		0.0829	α=0.0829
650.57	7+	> 1.0 ns	140.08 12	M1		4.09	B(M1)(W.u.)≤0.0012, α=4.09
650.57	7+	> 1.0 ns	650.60 16	E2		0.0169	B(E2)(W.u.)≤0.017, α=0.0169
886.36	5+	0.18 ps +8-6	823.25 14				B(E2)(W.u.)≤77, B(M1)(W.u.)≤0.15
886.36	5+	0.18 ps +8-6	886.4 2				B(E2)(W.u.)≤36, B(M1)(W.u.)≤0.08
924.85	2+		291.77 6	M1+E2	0.57 26	0.41	α=0.41
924.85	2+		861.83 7	[E2]		0.0095	α=0.0095
1033.26	4+	0.72 ps +26-17	970.25 14				B(E2)(W.u.)≤2.4, B(M1)(W.u.)≤0.0064
1033.26	4+	0.72 ps +26-17	1033.31 14				B(E2)(W.u.)≤4.3, B(M1)(W.u.)≤0.013
1069.11	3+	0.44 ps +21-12	1069.3 2				B(E2)(W.u.)=0.25 +11-8
1095.06	6+	0.13 ps +5-4	1094.9 2				B(E2)(W.u.)≤55, B(M1)(W.u.)≤0.17
1571.1	10-	2.58 ms 4 % IT = 100	920.5 3	E3(+M4)	0.05 LT	0.0200	B(E3)(W.u.)=3.21E-4 5, α=0.0200 2
2077.66	0-,1-,2-		275.26 15	E1		0.0372	α=0.0372
3449.4	(13+)		248.4 3	M1		0.8	α=0.8 2

E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
0.0	5+	3.68×10⁺⁵ y 4 % ε = 100	Q=-0.51 7, μ=+4.578 13 Isotope shift measured (1983LaZZ, 2000Pe30, 2007Me09).
63.02	4+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν3p_1/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_{3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
510.28	6+	118 ps 14	configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_5/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
601.46	4+	5.5 ps 21	configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_5/2^-1 + π2f_7/2ν3p_1/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
628.33	5+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_5/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
633.14	3+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_5/2^-1 + π2f_7/2ν3p_1/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_{1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
650.57	7+	> 1.0 ns	configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_5/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
886.36	5+	0.18 ps +8-6	configuration=π1h_9/2ν3p_3/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_{3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
924.85	2+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_5/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
936.27	3+	> 1.7 ps	configuration=π2f_7/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_{1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
958.99	4+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν3p_3/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
1033.26	4+	0.72 ps +26-17	configuration=π2f_7/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
1069.11	3+	0.44 ps +21-12	configuration=π1h_9/2ν3p_3/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
1095.06	6+	0.13 ps +5-4	configuration=π1h_9/2ν3p_3/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_{1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
1469.47	4+,5+,6+		configuration=π2f_7/2ν2f_5/2^-1.
1571.1	10-	2.58 ms 4 % IT = 100	μ=2.672 14 (1974Hu11,1985No09,2005St24) configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
1624.68	6-		configuration=π1i_13/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
1657.47	8-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_{9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
1666.58	7-		configuration=π1i_13/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
1703.35	5-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J(1703) and J(1839) are reversed from the values suggested by 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t). J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_{9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_{3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J(1703) and J(1839) are reversed from the values suggested by 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t).}}
1715.66	6-,7-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. Weighted average from (p,nγ), (n,2nγ), and IT decay. Doublet in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d), ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t), and ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d),(α,t) on the basis of strength. No broadening observed in (p,d), thus the levels are <3 keV apart. Doublet resolved in (p,nγ). J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_{5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
1716.17	6-,7-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. Weighted average from (p,nγ), (n,2nγ), and IT decay. Doublet in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d), ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t), and ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d),(α,t) on the basis of strength. No broadening observed in (p,d), thus the levels are <3 keV apart. Doublet resolved in (p,nγ). J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
1786.1	9-		configuration: based on L-transfer in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d). However, observation that L=0 in ²¹⁰Bi(9-)(p,t), with configuration=π1h_9/2ν2g_9/2^-1 for the ²¹⁰Bi target requires the presence of core-excited components in the wavefunction (1979Er11).
1802.09	1+		configuration=π2f_7/2ν2f_5/2^-1. J^π(level): From L(³He,t)=0 at E=200 and 450 MeV, and the assumption that possible 0⁺ anti-analog states below the analog of the ²⁰⁸Pb g.s. will not Be populated at the bombarding energies used (1991Ja04).
1839.03	4-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J(1703) and J(1839) are reversed from the values suggested by 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t).
E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
1870.77	3+,4+		configuration=π2f_7/2ν3p_3/2^-1.
1919.97	3-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
2077.66	0-,1-,2-		J^π(level): 2006Bo08 in (p,nγ) suggest that the 2078 level is a two-particle two-hole excitation and that the lowest such state is expected to have Jπ=1-. The 2208 level deexcites via an E1 γ to 1⁺ and so has Jπ=0-, 1-, or 2-. The 1141γ to 3⁺ suggests Jπ=2-; however, as pointed out by the authors, the branching of this transition is small, and is not inconsistent with mult=M2, allowing Jπ=1-. The evaluator notes that the 1141γ could also Be E3, in which case Jπ=0- is also not ruled out. 2006Bo08 further suggest that the states at 2203, 2416, and 2478 are probably also two-particle two-hole states. See 2006Bo08 for a discussion of these configurations.
2126.90	2+,3,4+		configuration=π2f_7/2ν3p_3/2^-1.
2202.89	1-,2-,3-		J^π(level): 2006Bo08 in (p,nγ) suggest that the 2078 level is a two-particle two-hole excitation and that the lowest such state is expected to have Jπ=1-. The 2208 level deexcites via an E1 γ to 1⁺ and so has Jπ=0-, 1-, or 2-. The 1141γ to 3⁺ suggests Jπ=2-; however, as pointed out by the authors, the branching of this transition is small, and is not inconsistent with mult=M2, allowing Jπ=1-. The evaluator notes that the 1141γ could also Be E3, in which case Jπ=0- is also not ruled out. 2006Bo08 further suggest that the states at 2203, 2416, and 2478 are probably also two-particle two-hole states. See 2006Bo08 for a discussion of these configurations.
2340.1	7+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
2383.86	4+,5+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. In (p,d) a level at 2385.3 22 is proposed as a 4⁺, 5⁺ doublet. The 2383.8 and 2386.0 levels both deexcite to levels with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The evaluator assigns these levels as the components of the doublet.
2385.97	4+,5+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. In (p,d) a level at 2385.3 22 is proposed as a 4⁺, 5⁺ doublet. The 2383.8 and 2386.0 levels both deexcite to levels with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The evaluator assigns these levels as the components of the doublet.
2407	9-		configuration: from ²⁰⁶Pb(α,d) and ²¹⁰Bi(9-)(p,t).
2409.10	6+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
2415.72	1+,2,3,4-		J^π(level): 2006Bo08 in (p,nγ) suggest that the 2078 level is a two-particle two-hole excitation and that the lowest such state is expected to have Jπ=1-. The 2208 level deexcites via an E1 γ to 1⁺ and so has Jπ=0-, 1-, or 2-. The 1141γ to 3⁺ suggests Jπ=2-; however, as pointed out by the authors, the branching of this transition is small, and is not inconsistent with mult=M2, allowing Jπ=1-. The evaluator notes that the 1141γ could also Be E3, in which case Jπ=0- is also not ruled out. 2006Bo08 further suggest that the states at 2203, 2416, and 2478 are probably also two-particle two-hole states. See 2006Bo08 for a discussion of these configurations.
2426.7	11-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1.
2457.38	3+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
2470	9-		configuration: from ²⁰⁶Pb(α,d) and ²¹⁰Bi(9-)(p,t).
2501.56	2+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
2660.7	8+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
2718.55	2,3,4		J^π(level): Suggested by 1971Al05 in (d,t) as possible Jπ=2- member of the configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1 multiplet; however, the level is weakly populated and no L values was determined. The 2- member of that multiplet is now known to Be at 2894.
2804	(10-)		configuration=²⁰⁶Pb(0⁺)π1h_9/2ν1i_11/2. J^π(level): From 1977Da05 in ²⁰⁶Pb(α,d) based on similarity of Q value, L value and σ with levels in ²⁰⁶Bi and ²¹⁰Bi; and assumption that the levels are two-particle+(²⁰⁶Pb core) states with J(π)+J(ν)=J(max).
2884.07	1+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_{9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
2886.77			J^π(level): 1971Al05 report Jπ=3⁺ with configuration=π2f_5/2ν3p_{1/2^{-1 \}} for a peak at 2887 5. This could correspond to either the 2886.6 level or the 2888.4 level.
2888.47			J^π(level): 1971Al05 report Jπ=3⁺ with configuration=π2f_5/2ν3p_{1/2^{-1 \ for a peak at 2887 5. This could correspond to either the 2886.6 level or the 2888.4 level. J^π(level): 1971Al05 report Jπ=3⁺ with configuration=π2f_5/2ν3p_1/2}^{-1 \}} for a peak at 2887 5. This could correspond to either the 2886.6 level or the 2888.4 level.
2893.76	2-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1i_13/2^-1.
2942.88	2+		configuration=π2f_5/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
3069.34	2+		configuration=π3p_3/2ν3p_{1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
3091	(8)-		configuration: from ²⁰⁶Pb(α,d) and ²¹⁰Bi(p,t). J^π(level): From 1977Da05 in ²⁰⁶Pb(α,d) based on similarity of Q value, L value and σ with levels in ²⁰⁶Bi and ²¹⁰Bi; and assumption that the levels are two-particle+(²⁰⁶Pb core) states with J(π)+J(ν)=J(max).
E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
3154	-		configuration=²⁰⁶Pb(2⁺)π1h_9/2ν2g_9/2^-1.
3171	1+		configuration=π3p_3/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From L(³He,t)=0 at E=200 and 450 MeV, and the assumption that possible 0⁺ anti-analog states below the analog of the ²⁰⁸Pb g.s. will not Be populated at the bombarding energies used (1991Ja04).
3257	1+,2+		configuration=π3p_3/2ν3p_{1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
3271	+		configuration: the level appears to have a ν2f_7/2^-1 component also. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
3286.38	2+		configuration=π3p_3/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
3300	-		configuration=²⁰⁶Pb(2⁺)π1h_9/2ν2g_9/2.
3318	+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1h_{9/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_{5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}}
3327	4-,5-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν3s_1/2^-1.
3347	4-,5-		configuration=π1h_9/2ν3s_1/2^-1.
3362	+		configuration: the level appears to have a ν2f_7/2^-1 component also. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
3407	1+,2+		configuration=π3p_3/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
3412	+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1h_9/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
3449.4	(13+)		configuration: from ²⁰⁸Pb(p,n) (E=3400).
3453	-		configuration=²⁰⁶Pb(2⁺)π1h_9/2ν2g_9/2.
3457	1+,2+		configuration=π3p_3/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_{1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
3461	+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1h_9/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
3499.7	(11+)		conf=²⁰⁶Pb(0⁺)π1i_13/2π2g_9/2. J^π(level): From 1977Da05 in ²⁰⁶Pb(α,d) based on similarity of Q value, L value and σ with levels in ²⁰⁶Bi and ²¹⁰Bi; and assumption that the levels are two-particle+(²⁰⁶Pb core) states with J(π)+J(ν)=J(max).
3521	9-		configuration=²⁰⁶Pb(0⁺)π1h_9/2ν2g_9/2.
3524	+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1h_9/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
3541	+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1h_9/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_{5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_{13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_{9/2, and 3s_{1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}}}}
3563	-		configuration=²⁰⁶Pb(2⁺)π1h_9/2ν2g_9/2.
3565	+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1h_9/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_{1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_{7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}}
3600.6	(12+)		configuration=²⁰⁶Pb(0⁺)π1h_9/2ν1j_15/2. J^π(level): From 1977Da05 in ²⁰⁶Pb(α,d) based on similarity of Q value, L value and σ with levels in ²⁰⁶Bi and ²¹⁰Bi; and assumption that the levels are two-particle+(²⁰⁶Pb core) states with J(π)+J(ν)=J(max).
3611	1+,2+		configuration=π3p_3/2ν3p_1/2^-1. J^π(level): From 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d) based on L-transfer and σ. This reaction populates levels with configuration=πnljν3p_1/2^-1J where the proton particle states involved are 1h9/2 (L=5), 2f7/2 (L=3), 1i13/2 (L=6), 2f5/2 (L=3), and 3p3/2 (L=1). As long as the full strength is seen for a multiplet, then this strength must Be distributed among the members of that multiplet in proportion to 2J+1. The authors note that the total strength in each multiplet is close to that expected on the basis of sum rule limits. The L=1 states are fragmented so only the combination 1⁺,2⁺ can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.
3662			XREF: F(3649).
E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
3718	+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1h_9/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_{3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
3863	1+		J^π(level): From L(³He,t)=0 at E=200 and 450 MeV, and the assumption that possible 0⁺ anti-analog states below the analog of the ²⁰⁸Pb g.s. will not Be populated at the bombarding energies used (1991Ja04).
3886	(+)		configuration=π1h_9/2ν1h_9/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_{9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
4015	+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_{7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_{1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}}
4043	1+		J^π(level): From L(³He,t)=0 at E=200 and 450 MeV, and the assumption that possible 0⁺ anti-analog states below the analog of the ²⁰⁸Pb g.s. will not Be populated at the bombarding energies used (1991Ja04).
4159.1	(13+)		J^π(level): Proposed by 2003Fo03 on the basis of the agreement of energy with calculations using the shell model, and the observed γ decay modes.
4291.0	(13)		J^π(level): Proposed by 2003Fo03 on the basis of the agreement of energy with calculations using the shell model, and the observed γ decay modes.
4484.3	(14+)		J^π(level): Proposed by 2003Fo03 on the basis of the agreement of energy with calculations using the shell model, and the observed γ decay modes.
4543	+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. E(level): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_{9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available. J^π(level): From L and σ in (p,d) (1973Cr05). This reaction populates levels with configuration=π1h_9/2ν(nlj)^-1J where the hole states involved are 3p_1/2, 2f_5/2, 3p_3/2, 1i_13/2, 2f_7/2, 1h_9/2, and 3s_1/2. The energies of these hole states are well known in ²⁰⁷Pb. As long as the full pick-up strength for a given L transfer is observed, then the pickup strength must Be distributed among the various possible J values in proportion to 2J+1. See 1973Cr05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d) and also 1971Al05 in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t),(³He,α). The 628 and 633 levels are an unresolved doublet with Jπ=3⁺ and 5⁺. The 633 level is assigned as the 3⁺ member of the doublet on the basis of its strong γ feeding from the 2⁺ level at 925. For the L=5 levels, and for the levels above 3800, only π can Be established. Supporting arguments are given where available.}
4617	1+		configuration=π1h_9/2ν2f_7/2^-1. J^π(level): From L(³He,t)=0 at E=200 and 450 MeV, and the assumption that possible 0⁺ anti-analog states below the analog of the ²⁰⁸Pb g.s. will not Be populated at the bombarding energies used (1991Ja04).
4635.3	(15+)		J^π(level): Proposed by 2003Fo03 on the basis of the agreement of energy with calculations using the shell model, and the observed γ decay modes.
4836.2	(14-)		configuration=²⁰⁶Pb(0⁺)π1i_13/2ν1j_15/2. J^π(level): From 1977Da05 in ²⁰⁶Pb(α,d) based on similarity of Q value, L value and σ with levels in ²⁰⁶Bi and ²¹⁰Bi; and assumption that the levels are two-particle+(²⁰⁶Pb core) states with J(π)+J(ν)=J(max).
5463.0	(15-)		J^π(level): Proposed by 2003Fo03 on the basis of the agreement of energy with calculations using the shell model, and the observed γ decay modes.
5626.6	(16-)		J^π(level): Proposed by 2003Fo03 on the basis of the agreement of energy with calculations using the shell model, and the observed γ decay modes.
5.9E+3	1+		J^π(level): From L(³He,t)=0 at E=200 and 450 MeV, and the assumption that possible 0⁺ anti-analog states below the analog of the ²⁰⁸Pb g.s. will not Be populated at the bombarding energies used (1991Ja04).
8.19E+3	1+		J^π(level): From L(³He,t)=0 at E=200 and 450 MeV, and the assumption that possible 0⁺ anti-analog states below the analog of the ²⁰⁸Pb g.s. will not Be populated at the bombarding energies used (1991Ja04).
9000		≈ 40 ns	2003Fo03 in ²⁰⁸Pb(⁴⁸Ca,Xγ) state that they have established the presence of an isomer at about 9 MeV with a half-life of the order of 40 ns.
9.8E+3	1+		J^π(level): From L(³He,t)=0 at E=200 and 450 MeV, and the assumption that possible 0⁺ anti-analog states below the analog of the ²⁰⁸Pb g.s. will not Be populated at the bombarding energies used (1991Ja04).
15165	0+	231 keV 6	Γ(p)=130 4; Γ(p 3p1/2)=51.6 17; Γ(p 2f5/2)=20.6 17; Γ(p 3p3/2)=58 3; Γ(p 2f7/2)\|<4. E(level): Γ(p)=130 4; Γ(p 3p1/2)=51.6 17; Γ(p 2f5/2)=20.6 17; Γ(p 3p3/2)=58 3; Γ(p 2f7/2)\|<4.
15.6E+3	1+		Γ_p=184 49 Γ_p=58 keV 20, 102 keV 31, 8 keV 9, and 16 keV 8 for proton decay to the 3p1/2, 2f7/2 + 3p3/2, 1i13/2, and 2f7/2 neutron hole states, respectively, in ²⁰⁷Pb.
21.1E+3	0-,1-,2-	10 MeV 3	configuration=isovector spin-flip dipole resonance.

E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
63.02	63.00	E(γ): weighted average of 62.94 5 from 0.¹¹⁹S ²¹²At(α), 63.13 10 from ²⁰⁸Po ε decay, and 63.1 1 from (p,nγ) M(γ): From ε decay
510.28	447.3	I(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ), (d,tγ), and IT decay
510.28	510.15	I(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ), (d,tγ), and IT decay M(γ): From IT decay
601.46	538.41	E(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay I(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ), (d,tγ), and ε decay M(γ): From ε decay
601.46	601.49	E(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay I(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ), (d,tγ), and ε decay M(γ): From ε decay
628.33	118.2	M(γ): From (p,nγ)
633.14	31.7	E(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay
633.14	570.09	E(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay M(γ): From ε decay
650.57	140.08	E(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and IT decay I(γ): Iγ/Iγ(651γ)=0.85 10 in (d,tγ). Weighted average from (p,nγ) and IT decay M(γ): From (p,nγ)
650.57	650.60	E(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and IT decay I(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and IT decay M(γ): From IT decay
886.36	886.4	I(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and (d,tγ)
924.85	291.77	E(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay I(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay M(γ): From ε decay
	861.83	E(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay I(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and ε decay
	925.11	I(γ): Iγ=2.3 11 is reported in ε decay; however, the transition is not seen in (p,nγ) where the adopted limit is reported
958.99	959.0	I(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ) and (d,tγ)
1033.26	146.6	M(γ): From (p,nγ)
1033.26	431.4	I(γ): from 1971Pr02 in (p,nγ). 2006Bo08 report 1.2 3
1069.11	110.0	M(γ): From (p,nγ)
1069.11	467.37	I(γ): Iγ/Iγ(1006γ)=0.19 4 is reported in ²⁰⁹Bi(d,tγ)
1095.06	207.8	E(γ): from the E(level) difference. Eγ=208 is reported in (d,tγ) I(γ): Iγ/Iγ(1095γ)=0.02 1 is reported in (d,tγ). In (p,nγ) 1971Pr02 report a ratio of <0.06, and 2006Bo08 do not see the transition
1571.1	920.5	E(γ): Weighted average from (p,nγ), (n,2nγ), and IT decay. Doublet in ²⁰⁹Bi(p,d), ²⁰⁹Bi(d,t), and ²⁰⁷Pb(³He,d),(α,t) on the basis of strength. No broadening observed in (p,d), thus the levels are <3 keV apart. Doublet resolved in (p,nγ)
1839.03	135.6	M(γ): From (p,nγ)
1919.97	80.7	M(γ): From (p,nγ)
2077.66	275.26	M(γ): From (p,nγ)
2202.89	125.3	M(γ): From (p,nγ)
E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
3600.6	101	E(γ): not observed, but required by coincidence data in ²⁰⁸Pb(⁴⁸Ca,Xγ). The energy is from the E(level) difference