ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS for 158Ta

Author: N. Nica |  Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 141, 1 (2017) |  Cutoff date: 1-Feb-2017 

 Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version) 


Q(β-)=-7534 keV 358S(n)= 9645 keV 247S(p)= -448 keV 13Q(α)= 6124 keV 4
S(2n)= 21448 keV 247S(2p)= 2045 keV 13Q(EC)= 10936 keV 197Q(ECp)= 7985 keV 196
Reference: 2017WA10

References:
  A  158Ta IT decay:6.1 μs  B  162Re α decay (107 MS)
  C  162Re α decay (77 MS)  D  102Pd(58Ni,pnγ)








E(level)
(keV)
XREFJπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)
(keV)
I(γ)M(γ)Final Levels
     0.0 B   (2-) 55 ms 15 
% ε ≈ 9
% α ≈ 91
     
   141 9 A CD (9+) 36.7 ms 15 
% ε = 5 5
% α = 95 5
     
   207.10 20 A CD (10+)       66.1 2 
  100
(M1)
   141
(9+)
   919.50 10 A  D (11+)      778.5 1 
  100
(E2)
   141
(9+)
   923.2 8 ?A  D      782.2 10 
  100

   141
(9+)
   953.40 22 A  D (12+)       33.9S
   746.3 1 
 
  100
(M1)
(E2)
   919.50
   207.10
(11+)
(10+)
  1358.5 8 ?A  D      435.3 1 
  100

   923.2

  1391.88 24 A  D       33.4S
   438.5 1 
 
  100


  1358.5
   953.40

(12+)
  1551.53 24 A  D (14+)      159.5 2 ?
   598.1 1 
    2.0 2 
  100

(E2)
  1391.88
   953.40

(12+)
  1804.2 3 A  D (16+)      252.9 1 
  100
(E2)
  1551.53
(14+)
  1824.92 25 A  D      273.1 1 
   434?
  100
 


  1551.53
  1391.88
(14+)

  2025.47 25 A  D      200.2 2 
   474.0 1 
   633.7 2 
   10.0 6 
   39.8 11 
  100 8 



  1824.92
  1551.53
  1391.88

(14+)

  2098.2 3 A  D (16+)       72.7S
   273.1 1 
 
  100


  2025.47
  1824.92


  2387.2 3 A  D (17+)      583.0 2 
  100
(M1)
  1804.2
(16+)
  2601.6 3    D      503.3 1 
   797.6 2 
  100.0 13 
   31.5 15 


  2098.2
  1804.2
(16+)
(16+)
  2805.5 4 A  D (19-) 6.1 µs 1 
% IT = 98.6 2
% α = 1.4 2
   418.5 7 
   708.1 9 
  1001.6 11 
    4.8 6 
   11.7 8 
  100 5 
(M2)
(E3)
(E3)
  2387.2
  2098.2
  1804.2
(17+)
(16+)
(16+)
E(level)
(keV)
XREFJπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)
(keV)
I(γ)M(γ)Final Levels
  2853.8 4    D      466.6 2 
  100

  2387.2
(17+)
  2877.9 4    D     1052.5 3 
  1074.1 3 
  100 8 
   84 8 


  1824.92
  1804.2

(16+)
  2938.3 3 ?   D      336.6 1 
  100

  2601.6

  2959.7 3    D      357.9 2 
   572.6 3 
   861.4 2 
  100.0 17 
    5.2 13 
   39.2 13 



  2601.6
  2387.2
  2098.2

(17+)
(16+)
  3021.4 3    D     1217.5 2 
  100

  1804.2
(16+)
  3063.2 4    D      257.7 1 
  100

  2805.5
(19-)
  3330.0 4    D      266.8 1 
  100

  3063.2

  3387.5 4    D      324.3 1 
  100

  3063.2

  3626.6 4    D      296.6 1 
  100

  3330.0

  3676.2 3    D      655.2 2 
   716.5 1 
   737.7 2 
   10.0 8 
  100.0 11 
   20.3 8 



  3021.4
  2959.7
  2938.3



  3776.0 4    D      388.5 1 
  100

  3387.5

  3794.1 4    D      406.6 1 
  100

  3387.5

  3851.4 4    D      830.0 12 
   893?
  100
 


  3021.4
  2959.7


  4088.3 3    D      236.9 1 
   412.1 1 
   11.9 4 
  100.0 8 


  3851.4
  3676.2


  4349.4 3    D      261.0 1 
  100

  4088.3

  4613.5 3    D      525.2 1 
  100

  4088.3

  4645.0 4    D      868.9 2 
  100

  3776.0

  4652.2 4    D      876.3 2 
  100

  3776.0

  4779.1 4    D     1003.1 2 
  100

  3776.0

  4955.9 4    D      606.3 1 
  100

  4349.4

  4996.2 4    D      382.8 1 
  100

  4613.5

  5064.8 5    D     1288.8 3 
  100

  3776.0

  5142.2 4    D      146.0 1 
  100

  4996.2

E(level)
(keV)
XREFJπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)
(keV)
I(γ)M(γ)Final Levels
  5229.2 4    D      576.5 3 
   583.7 2 
   35 8 
  100 19 


  4652.2
  4645.0


  5362.1 4    D      366.3 2 
   406.1 1 
  1013.4 3 
   65 4 
  100 11 
   71 5 



  4996.2
  4955.9
  4349.4



  5415.3 4    D      185.9 1 
   273.1 1 
   350?
   636.7 7 
   763.5 2 
   770.7 2 
   20.4 10 
  100.0 14 
 
   19 9 
   19.1 14 
   40.5 14 






  5229.2
  5142.2
  5064.8
  4779.1
  4652.2
  4645.0






  5628.9 4    D      266.8 1 
  100

  5362.1

  6166.0 4    D     1023.8 2 
  100

  5142.2

  6259.3 4    D      844.0 2 
  100

  5415.3

  6619.2 4 ?   D     1203.9 2 ?
  100

  5415.3

  6781.7 5    D      615.7 2 
  100

  6166.0

E(level): Deduced from least-squares fit to Eγ data. Reduced χ2=3.4 is lager than critical χ2=1.8 at 95% confidence level, probably due to underestimated uncertainty of 0.1 keV for many γ rays, especially for some unresolved structures. Five Eγ values deviate by 2-3 σ from the fitted values

Jπ(level): Above (9+): from measured stretched multipolarities and increasing spin values with increasing energy excitation based on the heavy-ion reaction type

E(γ): From 102Pd(58Ni,pnγ) dataset (2016Ca15) that are more precise than those from IT decay, which are systematically 0.5 to 1 keV higher in energy

I(γ): Values from 102Pd(58Ni,pnγ) dataset (2016Ca15)

M(γ): From 158Ta IT decay:6.1~μs dataset (2016Ca15, 2014Ca03) based on intensity balance arguments and transition rates for expected level lifetime, except where noted. Only pure multipolarities were assumed.

Back to top

Band Transitions:

E(level)
(keV)
Jπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)I(γ)M(γ)Final Levels
Band 1 - γ cascade based on 10+.
   207.10 20  (10+)        
   953.40 22  (12+)        
  1551.53 24  (14+)      159.5 2 ?
   598.1 1 
    2.0 2 
  100

(E2)
  1391.88
   953.40

(12+)
  1804.2 3  (16+)      252.9 1 
  100
(E2)
  1551.53
(14+)
E(level)
(keV)
Jπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)I(γ)M(γ)Final Levels
Band 2 - γ cascade based on 19- isomer
  2805.5 4  (19-) 6.1 µs 1 
% IT = 98.6 2
% α = 1.4 2
     
  3063.2 4         
  3387.5 4       324.3 1 
  100

  3063.2

  3776.0 4       388.5 1 
  100

  3387.5

E(level)
(keV)
Jπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)I(γ)M(γ)Final Levels
Band 3 - γ cascade based on 3676.5 level
  3676.2 3         
  4088.3 3         
  4613.5 3       525.2 1 
  100

  4088.3

  4996.2 4       382.8 1 
  100

  4613.5

  5142.2 4       146.0 1 
  100

  4996.2

Back to top

Additional Gamma Data:













E(level)
(keV)
Jπ(level)T1/2(level)E(γ)
(keV)
MultipolarityConversion
Coefficient
Additional Data
   207.10 (10+)       66.1 2 (M1)2.46α=2.46, α(L)=1.90 4, α(M)=0.432 8, α(N)=0.1034 18, α(O)=0.0164 3, α(P)=0.001130 19
   919.50 (11+)      778.5 1 (E2)0.00723α=0.00723, α(K)=0.00586 9, α(L)=0.001057 15, α(M)=0.000244 4, α(N)=5.80×10-5 9, α(O)=8.85E-6 13, α(P)=5.03E-7 7
   953.40 (12+)       33.9(M1)17.52α=17.52, α(L)=13.57 19, α(M)=3.08 5, α(N)=0.737 11, α(O)=0.1165 17, α(P)=0.00804 12
(12+)      746.3 1 (E2)0.00792α=0.00792, α(K)=0.00640 9, α(L)=0.001176 17, α(M)=0.000271 4, α(N)=6.45×10-5 9, α(O)=9.83E-6 14, α(P)=5.49E-7 8
  1551.53 (14+)      598.1 1 (E2)0.01306α=0.01306, α(K)=0.01031 15, α(L)=0.00212 3, α(M)=0.000494 7, α(N)=0.0001172 17, α(O)=1.757×10-5 25, α(P)=8.79E-7 13
  1804.2 (16+)      252.9 1 (E2)0.1387α=0.1387, α(K)=0.0886 13, α(L)=0.0382 6, α(M)=0.00935 14, α(N)=0.00220 3, α(O)=0.000305 5, α(P)=6.76×10-6 10
  2387.2 (17+)      583.0 2 (M1)0.0350α=0.0350, α(K)=0.0293 5, α(L)=0.00444 7, α(M)=0.001003 14, α(N)=0.000240 4, α(O)=3.81×10-5 6, α(P)=2.68E-6 4
  2805.5 (19-) 6.1 µs 1 
% IT = 98.6 2
% α = 1.4 2
   418.5 7 (M2)0.278B(M2)(W.u.)=0.00054 8, α=0.278, α(K)=0.223 4, α(L)=0.0425 7, α(M)=0.00990 15, α(N)=0.00238 4, α(O)=0.000373 6, α(P)=2.46×10-5 4
(19-) 6.1 µs 1 
% IT = 98.6 2
% α = 1.4 2
   708.1 9 (E3)0.0224B(E3)(W.u.)=0.146 13, α=0.0224, α(K)=0.01644 24, α(L)=0.00460 7, α(M)=0.001103 17, α(N)=0.000262 4, α(O)=3.85E-5 6, α(P)=1.598E-6 23
(19-) 6.1 µs 1 
% IT = 98.6 2
% α = 1.4 2
  1001.6 11 (E3)0.00949B(E3)(W.u.)=0.110 8, α=0.00949, α(K)=0.00745 11, α(L)=0.001568 23, α(M)=0.000367 6, α(N)=8.75E-5 13, α(O)=1.325E-5 19, α(P)=7.01E-7 10

Back to top

Additional Level Data and Comments:

E(level)Jπ(level)T1/2(level)Comments
   141(9+) 36.7 ms 15 
% ε = 5 5
% α = 95 5
Possible configuration=πh11/2~#νf7/2 based on that for 9+ isomers in neighboring nuclei (2016Ca15 cite 1997Da07).
   207.10(10+)   E(level): γ cascade based on 10+.
   953.40(12+)   E(level): γ cascade based on 10+.
  1551.53(14+)   E(level): γ cascade based on 10+.
  1804.2(16+)   E(level): γ cascade based on 10+.
  2805.5(19-) 6.1 µs 1 
% IT = 98.6 2
% α = 1.4 2
An α peak observed at 8644 keV 11 from this isomer, assignment based on correlated γ rays with this α line. No protons were observed from this isomer, even though allowed by decay Q value.
E(level): An α peak observed at 8644 keV 11 from this isomer, assignment based on correlated γ rays with this α line. No protons were observed from this isomer, even though allowed by decay Q value. γ cascade based on 19- isomer.
  3063.2   E(level): γ cascade based on 19- isomer.
  3387.5   E(level): γ cascade based on 19- isomer.
  3676.2   E(level): γ cascade based on 3676.5 level.
  3776.0   E(level): γ cascade based on 19- isomer.
  4088.3   E(level): γ cascade based on 3676.5 level.
  4613.5   E(level): γ cascade based on 3676.5 level.
  4996.2   E(level): γ cascade based on 3676.5 level.
  5142.2   E(level): γ cascade based on 3676.5 level.

Back to top

Additional Gamma Comments:

E(level)E(gamma)Comments
   207.10    66.1E(γ): From 2016Ca15 (Table II) for delayed γ rays from the 6.1-μs isomer
M(γ): From intensity balance arguments (158Ta IT decay, 2014Ca03)
   919.50   778.5M(γ): From consistency with angular correlation data in 2016Ca15, although, no data are provided, reason for which the assignments are still to be confirmed by futher study.
   923.2   782.2E(γ): From 2016Ca15 (Table II) for delayed γ rays from the 6.1-μs isomer
   953.40    33.9E(γ): γ not observed, its existence required by γγ-coin data. Energy was deduced from difference of connecting levels
   746.3M(γ): From consistency with angular correlation data in 2016Ca15, although, no data are provided, reason for which the assignments are still to be confirmed by futher study.
  1391.88    33.4E(γ): possible transition discussed in text (2016Ca15), not shown in authors’ level scheme (Fig. 3). γ not observed, its existence required by γγ-coin data. Energy was deduced from difference of connecting levels
  1551.53   598.1M(γ): From consistency with angular correlation data in 2016Ca15, although, no data are provided, reason for which the assignments are still to be confirmed by futher study.
  1804.2   252.9E(γ): level-energy difference=252.7
M(γ): From consistency with angular correlation data in 2016Ca15, although, no data are provided, reason for which the assignments are still to be confirmed by futher study.
  1824.92   273.1E(γ): unresolved triplet, placed from 1825, 2099 and 5415 levels. level-energy difference=273.4. Multiply placed with undivided intensity
I(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity
  2098.2    72.7E(γ): γ not observed, its existence required by γγ-coin data. Energy was deduced from difference of connecting levels
   273.1E(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity
I(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity
  2387.2   583.0E(γ): 583.0+583.7 and 406.1+406.6 form unresolved doublets; however, based on γγ-coin data, separated intensities are assigned
  2805.5   418.5E(γ): From the IT decay dataset
I(γ): From the IT decay dataset
   708.1E(γ): From the IT decay dataset
I(γ): From the IT decay dataset
  1001.6E(γ): From the IT decay dataset
I(γ): From the IT decay dataset
  2959.7   357.9E(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity
I(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity
  3330.0   266.8E(γ): unresolved doublet, placed from 3330 and 5629 levels. Multiply placed with undivided intensity
I(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity
  3794.1   406.6E(γ): 583.0+583.7 and 406.1+406.6 form unresolved doublets; however, based on γγ-coin data, separated intensities are assigned
  5229.2   583.7E(γ): level-energy difference=584.2. 583.0+583.7 and 406.1+406.6 form unresolved doublets; however, based on γγ-coin data, separated intensities are assigned
  5362.1   406.1E(γ): 583.0+583.7 and 406.1+406.6 form unresolved doublets; however, based on γγ-coin data, separated intensities are assigned
  1013.4E(γ): level-energy difference=1012.7
  5415.3   273.1E(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity
I(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity
   770.7E(γ): level-energy difference=770.3
  5628.9   266.8E(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity
I(γ): Multiply placed with undivided intensity

Back to top