Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Author: E.A. Mccutchan and A.A. Sonzogni Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 115, 135 (2014)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 270.15 | (3-,4-,5-) | 5.3 µs 4 | IT: 100 % |
|
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 1.41 | 45.80 % 14 | 6.458E-4 20 |
| Auger K | 10.2 | 13.26 % 14 | 0.001352 15 |
| CE K | 97.4 5 | 32.3 % | 0.0314 |
| CE L | 109.1 5 | 4.45 % | 0.00486 |
| CE M | 110.6 5 | 0.707 % | 7.82E-4 |
| CE N | 110.9 5 | 0.0595 % | 6.59E-5 |
| CE K | 145.6 5 | 3.37 % | 0.00490 |
| CE L | 157.3 5 | 0.380 % | 5.98E-4 |
| CE M | 158.8 5 | 0.0603 % | 9.6E-5 |
| CE N | 159.1 5 | 0.00553 % | 8.8E-6 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 1.48 | 0.906 % 24 | 1.34E-5 3 |
| XR kα2 | 11.878 | 6.56 % 25 | 7.8E-4 3 |
| XR kα1 | 11.924 | 12.7 % 5 | 0.00151 6 |
| XR kβ3 | 13.284 | 0.89 % 3 | 1.18E-4 4 |
| XR kβ1 | 13.292 | 1.72 % 6 | 2.29E-4 8 |
| XR kβ2 | 13.469 | 0.172 % 6 | 2.32E-5 9 |
| 110.9 5 | 62.5 % | 0.0694 | |
| 159.1 5 | 96.18 % | 0.1530 | |
Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.
| E(γ) | Coincidence |
| 110.9 | 159.1 |
| 159.1 | 110.9 |
Dataset #2:
Author: T.D. Johnson and W.D. Kulp Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 129, 1 (2015)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | (1,2-) | 16.5 s 1 | β-n: 6.58 18 % | 1922 3 |
|
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| 532.12 5 | 0.26 % 3 | 0.00140 15 | |