Results:3 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Author: Balraj Singh Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 105, 223 (2005)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0 | 1+ | 17.68 m 2 | β-: 91.7 2 % | 2003.0 24 |
|
Beta-:
| Energy (keV) | End-point energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 227.63 96 | 682.6 24 | 0.190 % 20 | 4.3E-4 5 |
| 253.14 98 | 747.0 24 | 0.31 % 3 | 7.9E-4 8 |
| 524.4 11 | 1386.4 24 | 6.2 % 6 | 0.033 3 |
| 804.0 11 | 2003.0 24 | 85.0 % 7 | 0.684 6 |
Mean beta- energy: 782 keV 11, total beta- intensity: 91.7 % 9, mean beta- dose: 0.717 MeV/Bq-s 12
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| 616.3 5 | 6.7 % | 0.041 | |
| 639.4 2 | 0.26 % 3 | 0.00167 21 | |
| 703.8 2 | 0.19 % 3 | 0.00137 23 | |
| 1256.2 4 | 0.074 % 10 | 9.3E-4 12 | |
Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.
| E(γ) | Coincidence |
| 616.3 | 639.4, 703.8 |
| 639.4 | 616.3 |
| 703.8 | 616.3 |
Dataset #2:
Author: Balraj Singh Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 105, 223 (2005)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0 | 1+ | 17.68 m 2 | ε: 8.3 2 % | 1870.5 3 |
|
Beta+:
| Energy (keV) | End-point energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 368.2 10 | 848.5 3 | 2.20 % 21 | 0.0081 8 |
Mean beta+ energy: 3.7E+2 keV 5, total beta+ intensity: 2.20 % 21, mean beta+ dose: 0.0081 MeV/Bq-s 13
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 1.32 | 6.93 % 22 | 9.1E-5 3 |
| Auger K | 9.67 | 2.13 % 8 | 2.06E-4 7 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 1.38 | 0.123 % 5 | 1.70E-6 7 |
| XR kα2 | 11.182 | 0.94 % 5 | 1.05E-4 5 |
| XR kα1 | 11.222 | 1.83 % 9 | 2.05E-4 10 |
| XR kβ3 | 12.49 | 0.125 % 6 | 1.56E-5 8 |
| XR kβ1 | 12.496 | 0.243 % 12 | 3.04E-5 15 |
| XR kβ2 | 12.652 | 0.0173 % 9 | 2.19E-6 11 |
| Annihil. | 511.0 | 4.4 % 4 | |
| 665.8 2 | 1.08 % 13 | 0.0072 9 | |
| 788 3 ? | 0.007 % 7 | 5E-5 5 | |
| 812.2 15 | 0.040 % 14 | 3.3E-4 11 | |
Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.
| E(γ) | Coincidence |
| 665.8 | 788, 812.2 |
| 788 | 665.8 |
| 812.2 | 665.8 |
Dataset #3:
Author: Balraj Singh Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 105, 223 (2005)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 85.90230 | 5- | 4.4205 h 8 | IT |
|
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 1.41 | 173.1 % 5 | 0.002440 7 |
| Auger K | 10.2 | 46.9 % 5 | 0.00478 5 |
| CE K | 23.5783 20 | 53.711 % | 0.0126641 11 |
| CE L | 35.2700 20 | 6.0469 % | 0.00213273 12 |
| CE K | 35.38 3 | 72.298 % | 0.025576 22 |
| CE M | 36.7955 20 | 0.954 % | 3.50851E-4 19 |
| CE L | 47.07 3 | 22.395 % | 0.010541 7 |
| CE M | 48.59 3 | 3.793 % | 0.0018431 11 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 1.48 | 3.42 % 9 | 5.07E-5 13 |
| XR kα2 | 11.878 | 23.2 % 9 | 0.00275 10 |
| XR kα1 | 11.924 | 44.9 % 16 | 0.00535 20 |
| XR kβ3 | 13.284 | 3.15 % 11 | 4.18E-4 15 |
| XR kβ1 | 13.292 | 6.10 % 21 | 8.1E-4 3 |
| XR kβ2 | 13.469 | 0.610 % 23 | 8.2E-5 3 |
| 37.052 2 | 39.1 % 8 | 0.0145 3 | |
| 48.85 3 | 0.317 % 9 | 1.55E-4 4 | |
Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.
| E(γ) | Coincidence |
| 37.052 | 48.85 (7.43E-9) |
| 48.85 | 37.052 (7.43E-9) |