Results:2 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: Balraj Singh   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 135, 193 (2016)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
79
34
Se
 95.733    1/2-   3.92 m 1    IT       
79
34
Se
 

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L     1.32      99.6 % 13   0.001315 17 
Auger K     9.67      27.6 % 5   0.00266 5 
CE K    83.07 3       69.2 % 10   0.0575 9 
CE L    94.08 3       18.1 % 3   0.0170 3 
CE M    95.73 3        2.82 % 5   0.00270 5 
CE N    95.73 3        0.188 % 3   1.80E-4 3 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l     1.38       1.77 % 6   2.45E-5 8 
XR kα2    11.182      12.2 % 5   0.00136 5 
XR kα1    11.222      23.6 % 9   0.00265 10 
XR kβ3    12.49       1.62 % 6   2.02E-4 8 
XR kβ1    12.496       3.14 % 12   3.93E-4 15 
XR kβ2    12.652       0.224 % 9   2.83E-5 11 
    95.73 3        9.5367 % 15   0.009130 3 

Dataset #2:

Author: Balraj Singh   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 135, 193 (2016)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
79
34
Se
 0.0    7/2+   3.26×10+5 y 28    β-: 100  150.6 13   
79
35
Br
 

Beta-:

Energy
(keV)
End-point energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )




    52.8 5    150.6 13    100 %  0.0528

Mean beta- energy: 52.8 keV , total beta- intensity: 100 % , mean beta- dose: 0.0528 MeV/Bq-s