Results:2 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: Jun Chen and Balraj Singh   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 157, 1 (2019)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
50
23
V
 0.0    6+   2.65×10+17 y +16-18    β-: 0.7 7  1038.06 30   
50
24
Cr
 

Beta-:

Energy
(keV)
End-point energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )




    75.53 10  ?  254.8 3     ≈0 % ≈0

Mean beta- energy: 0 keV AP, total beta- intensity: 0 % AP, mean beta- dose: 0 MeV/Bq-s AP

Dataset #2:

Author: Jun Chen and Balraj Singh   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 157, 1 (2019)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
50
23
V
 0.0    6+   2.65×10+17 y +16-18    ε: 99.3 7  2207.6   
50
22
Ti
 

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L     0.42     147.7 % 15   6.20E-4 6 
Auger K     4.0      68.6 % 8   0.00274 3 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l     0.45       0.31 % 10   1.4E-6 5 
XR kα2     4.505       5.7 % 3   2.56E-4 12 
XR kα1     4.511      11.3 % 5   5.12E-4 25 
XR kβ1     4.932       1.26 % 5   6.2E-5 3 
XR kβ3     4.932       0.64 % 3   3.15E-5 13 
  1553.77 6       99.3 %  1.543