Results:2 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: S. -c. Wu   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 91, 1 (2000)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
46
21
Sc
 142.5288    1-   18.75 s 4    IT: 100      
46
21
Sc
 

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L     0.37      56.56 % 17   2.093E-4 6 
Auger K     3.64      26.87 % 17   9.78E-4 6 
CE K   138.035 8       33.418 %  0.046129
CE L   142.028 8        3.404 %  0.0048343

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l     0.4       0.11 % 4   4.5E-7 16 
XR kα2     4.086       1.90 % 8   7.8E-5 3 
XR kα1     4.091       3.78 % 17   1.54E-4 7 
XR kβ1     4.461       0.408 % 20   1.82E-5 9 
XR kβ3     4.461       0.207 % 10   9.2E-6 4 
   142.528 8       62.0 %  0.088

Dataset #2:

Author: S. -c. Wu   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 91, 1 (2000)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
46
21
Sc
 0.0    4+   83.79 d 4    β-: 100  2366.7   
46
22
Ti
 

Beta-:

Energy
(keV)
End-point energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )




   111.8 3    356.9 7     99.9964 % 7   0.1118 3 
   580.8 4   1477.4 7      0.0036 % 7   2.1E-5 4 

Mean beta- energy: 111.8 keV 3, total beta- intensity: 100.0000 % 10, mean beta- dose: 0.1118 MeV/Bq-s 3

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



   889.277 3       99.9840 % 10   0.889135 9 
  1120.545 4       99.9870 % 10   1.120399 12 
  2010       1.3E-5 % 10   2.6E-7 20 

Gamma Coincidence Data:

For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.

E(γ)Coincidence
   889.2771120.545 (4.69E-12)
  1120.545889.277 (4.69E-12)