Results:2 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: Jun Chen   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 140, 1 (2017)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
40
19
K
 0    4-   1.248×10+9 y 3    ε: 10.72 11  1504.40   
40
18
Ar
 

Beta+:

Energy
(keV)
End-point energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )




   197.325 25    482.40 6       1.00E-3 % 13   2.0E-6 3 

Mean beta+ energy: 2.0E+2 keV 4, total beta+ intensity: 1.00E-3 % 13, mean beta+ dose: 2.0E-6 MeV/Bq-s 4

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger K     2.66       7.17 % 8   1.906E-4 21 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR kα2     2.955       0.29 % 3   8.7E-6 10 
XR kα1     2.957       0.59 % 6   1.76E-5 17 
XR kβ1     3.19       0.047 % 5   1.51E-6 16 
XR kβ3     3.19       0.0244 % 25   7.8E-7 8 
Annihil.   511.0       0.0020 % 3  
  1460.820 5       10.66 % 17   0.1558 25 

Dataset #2:

Author: Jun Chen   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 140, 1 (2017)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
40
19
K
 0    4-   1.248×10+9 y 3    β-: 89.28 11  1310.89   
40
20
Ca
 

Beta-:

Energy
(keV)
End-point energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )




   560.18 5   1310.89 6     89.27 % 17   0.5001 10 

Mean beta- energy: 560.2 keV 15, total beta- intensity: 89.27 % 17, mean beta- dose: 0.5001 MeV/Bq-s 17