Results:2 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: Jun Chen   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 152, 1 (2018)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
38
17
Cl
 671.3618    5-   715 ms 3    IT       
38
17
Cl
 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



   671.360 8       99.950 % 10   0.67102 7 

Dataset #2:

Author: Jun Chen   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 152, 1 (2018)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
38
17
Cl
 0    2-   37.230 m 14    β-: 100  4916.72 22   
38
18
Ar
 

Beta-:

Energy
(keV)
End-point energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )




   111.914 80  ?  351.22 22      0.010 % 10   1.1E-5 11 
   365.201 95  ?  980.22 22      0.004 % 4   1.3E-5 13 
   420.107 97   1106.53 22     32.9 % 5   0.1382 21 
   639.07 10  ? 1539.82 22      0.010 % 10   6E-5 6 
  1181.41  2749.25 22     11.10 % 20   0.1311 24 
  2243.90  4916.72 22     56.0 % 6   1.257 13 

Mean beta- energy: 1526 keV 19, total beta- intensity: 100.0 % 8, mean beta- dose: 1.526 MeV/Bq-s 22

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  1209.4 ?      0.02 %  2.419E-4
  1642.68 2       32.9 % 5   0.540 8 
  2167.400 9       44.0 %  0.954
  2398.1 ?      0.02 %  4.796E-4
  3810.01 7        0.0259 % 18   9.9E-4 7 
  3936.1 ?      0.007 %  2.755E-4

Gamma Coincidence Data:

For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.

E(γ)Coincidence
  1209.42167.400
  1209.42167.400
  1642.682167.400
  1642.682167.400
  2167.4001209.4, 1209.4, 1642.68, 1642.68, 2398.1, 2398.1
  2398.12167.400
  2398.12167.400