Results:2 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: Khalifeh Abusaleem   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 116, 163 (2014)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
232
94
Pu
 0.0    0+   33.1 m 8    α   6716 10   
228
92
U
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  6542 10       7.6 % 23   0.50 15 
  6600 10      15 % 4   1.0 3 

Dataset #2:

Author: E. Browne   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 107, 2579 (2006)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
232
94
Pu
 0    0+   34.1 m 7    ε: 90 SY  1010 SY   
232
93
Np
 

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L    10.1      30 % 4   0.0031 4 
Auger K    74.3       1.7 % 3   0.0013 3 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l    13.9      32 % 4   0.0044 5 
XR kα2    97.069      17.0 % 24   0.0165 24 
XR kα1   101.059      27 % 4   0.027 4 
XR kβ3   113.303       3.4 % 5   0.0039 6 
XR kβ1   114.234       6.4 % 9   0.0074 11 
XR kβ2   117.463       2.5 % 4   0.0029 4