Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Authors: Ashok Jain, Sukhjeet Singh, Suresh Kumar, Jagdish Tuli Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 108, 883 (2007)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 1/2+ | 14.9 d 2 | α | 5097 5 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 4976 5 | 1.6E-9 % 9 | 8E-11 4 |
| 5006 5 | 5.2E-9 % 18 | 2.6E-10 9 |
Dataset #2:
Author: Balraj Singh Citation:ENSDF
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 1/2+ | 14.9 d 3 | β-: 100 % | 356 5 |
|
Beta-:
| Energy (keV) | End-point energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 93 4 | 316 5 | 68.8 % 17 | 0.064 3 |
| 105 4 | 356 5 | 31.2 % 17 | 0.0328 22 |
Mean beta- energy: 97 keV 4, total beta- intensity: 100.0 % 24, mean beta- dose: 0.097 MeV/Bq-s 5
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 9.28 | 15.7 % 5 | 0.00145 5 |
| CE L | 20.25 5 | 29.2 % | 0.00592 |
| CE M | 35.09 5 | 7.23 % | 0.00254 |
| CE N | 38.82 5 | 1.87 % | 7.27E-4 |
| CE O | 39.93 5 | 0.401 % | 1.600E-4 |
| CE P | 40.07 5 | 0.0609 % | 2.44E-5 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 12.7 | 13.6 % 5 | 0.00172 7 |
| 40.09 5 | 30.0 % | 0.0120 | |