Results:5 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Authors: B. Singh, S. Singh, H.X. Nguyen and M. Patial Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 114, 661 (2013)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 835.51 | (13/2)+ | α | 9540 7 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 10160 30 | 4.3 % | 0.44 |
Dataset #2:
Authors: B. Singh, S. Singh, H.X. Nguyen and M. Patial Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 114, 661 (2013)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 1121.51 | (17/2)- | α: 0.9 1 % | 9540 7 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 10483 20 | 0.90 % | 0.094 |
Dataset #3:
Authors: B. Singh, S. Singh, H.X. Nguyen and M. Patial Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 114, 661 (2013)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 1573.12 | (23/2)- | 3.5 ns 14 | α: 4.1 4 % | 9540 7 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 10913 15 | 4.1 % | 0.45 |
Dataset #4:
Authors: B. Singh, S. Singh, H.X. Nguyen and M. Patial Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 114, 661 (2013)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 1440.01 | (19/2)- | 4 ns 2 | α: 4.7 4 % | 9540 7 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 10779 15 | 4.7 % | 0.51 |
Dataset #5:
Authors: B. Singh, S. Singh, H.X. Nguyen and M. Patial Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 114, 661 (2013)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 9/2- | 86 ns 5 | α | 9540 7 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 9360 10 | 100 % | 9.360 |