Results:3 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: M. J. Martin   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 108,1583 (2007)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
212
84
Po
 1476.42    (8+)   17.1 ns 2    α   8954.12 11   
208
82
Pb
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



 10180 30      42 %  4.3

Dataset #2:

Author: M. J. Martin   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 108,1583 (2007)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
212
84
Po
 0.0    0+   0.299 µs 2    α: 100  8954.12 11   
208
82
Pb
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  8784.86 12     100 %  8.78486

Dataset #3:

Author: M. J. Martin   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 108,1583 (2007)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
212
84
Po
 293010    (18+)   45.1 s 6    α: 99.93 2  8954.12 11   
208
82
Pb
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  8525 8       2.05 % 9   0.175 8 
  9102 10       1.00 % 4   0.091 4 
 11660 10      96.83 % 10  11.291 15 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



   570 15        2.00 % 20   0.0114 12 
  2610 20        2.6 % 3   0.068 8 

Gamma Coincidence Data:

For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.

E(γ)Coincidence
   5702610
  2610570