Results:3 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: Huang Xiaolong and Kang Mengxiao   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 133, 221 (2016)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
202
85
At
 391.7+X2    (10-)   0.46 s 5    α: 0.096 11  6353.8 13   
198
83
Bi
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  6227 5       0.096 %  0.0060

Dataset #2:

Author: Huang Xiaolong and Kang Mengxiao   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 133, 221 (2016)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
202
85
At
 Y    (7+)   182 s 2    α   6353.8 13   
198
83
Bi
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  6134.6 12       8.7 %  0.53

Dataset #3:

Author: Huang Xiaolong and Kang Mengxiao   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 133, 221 (2016)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
202
85
At
 0    (2+,3+)   184 s 1    α   6353.8 13   
198
83
Bi
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  5929 10       0.015 %  8.8E-4
  6070 10       0.074 %  0.0045
  6227.7 14      37 %  2.3