Results:2 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Authors: Balraj Singh, and Jun Chen   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 169, 1 (2020)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
194
83
Bi
 0.0    (3+)   95 s 3    α: 0.46 25  5918   
190
81
Tl
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  5645 5       0.46 % 25   0.026 14 
  5799 5       0.0027 % 15   1.6E-4 9 

Dataset #2:

Authors: Balraj Singh, and Jun Chen   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 169, 1 (2020)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
194
83
Bi
 18412    (10-)   115 s 4    α   5918   
190
81
Tl
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  5335 5       3.0E-4 % 12   1.6E-5 6 
  5599 5       0.18 % 6   0.010 4 
  5660 5       0.0040 % 15   2.3E-4 8 
  5781 5       0.0054 % 19   3.1E-4 11 
  5892 5       0.007 % 3   4.2E-4 15