Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Authors: Balraj Singh, and Jun Chen Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 169, 1 (2020)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0+X | (4-,5-) | 286 ms 7 | α: 100 % | 7454 11 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 7145 15 | 9 % 3 | 0.64 22 |
| 7190 15 | 83 % 9 | 6.0 6 |
| 7266 15 | 7 % 3 | 0.51 22 |
| 7310 15 | 0.8 % 8 | 0.05 6 |
Dataset #2:
Authors: Balraj Singh, and Jun Chen Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 169, 1 (2020)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0+Y | (9-,10-) | 323 ms 7 | α: 100 % | 7454 11 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 6908 15 | 1.0 % 3 | 0.069 22 |
| 7087 15 | 13.0 % 24 | 0.92 17 |
| 7135 15 | 8.0 % 22 | 0.57 15 |
| 7178 15 | 78 % 9 | 5.6 7 |