Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Authors: T.D. Johnson, Balraj Singh Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 142, 1 (2017)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 957 | (13/2+) | 245 ms 11 | α | 7094 4 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 6375 15 | 0.8 % 3 | 0.051 19 |
| 7002 4 | 99.2 % 3 | 6.946 21 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| 637 1 | 67 % 8 | 0.42 5 | |
Dataset #2:
Authors: T.D. Johnson, Balraj Singh Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 142, 1 (2017)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0 | (3/2-) | 388 ms 40 | α | 7094 4 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 6420 20 | 0.7 % 3 | 0.045 19 |
| 6948 4 | 99.3 % 3 | 6.899 21 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| 549 1 | 71 % 10 | 0.39 5 | |