Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Authors: F.G. Kondev, S. Juutinen, D.J. Hartley Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 150, 1 (2018)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 11.5 ms 6 | α | 7696 26 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 7363 15 | 12.0 % 20 | 0.88 15 |
| 7435 15 | 56 % 4 | 4.2 3 |
| 7470 15 | 31 % 3 | 2.32 22 |
| 7535 25 | 0.5 % 5 | 0.04 4 |
Dataset #2:
Authors: F.G. Kondev, S. Juutinen, D.J. Hartley Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 150, 1 (2018)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0+X | (9-,10-) | 88 ms 6 | α: 100 % | 7696 26 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 7195 15 | 4.0 % 7 | 0.29 5 |
| 7224 15 | 82 % 3 | 5.92 22 |
| 7385 15 | 14.0 % 20 | 1.03 15 |
| 7535 25 ? | 0.5 % 5 | 0.04 4 |