Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Authors: J. C. Batchelder and A. M. Hurst, M. S. Basunia Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 183, 1 (2022)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 41439 | (10-) | 3.32 s 11 | IT: 94.1 3 % |
|
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 7.78 | 11.5 % 3 | 8.94E-4 22 |
| Auger K | 55.2 | 0.35 % 4 | 1.95E-4 21 |
| CE K | 180.97 10 | 0.13 % 9 | 2.4E-4 17 |
| CE L | 251.15 10 | 0.034 % 6 | 8.4E-5 15 |
| CE M | 262.80 10 | 0.0082 % 12 | 2.2E-5 3 |
| CE N | 265.65 10 | 0.0021 % 3 | 5.5E-6 9 |
| CE O | 266.43 10 | 3.9E-4 % 7 | 1.03E-6 19 |
| CE K | 288.67 10 | 9.43 % | 0.0272 |
| CE L | 358.85 10 | 10.33 % | 0.0371 |
| CE M | 370.50 10 | 2.72 % | 0.01009 |
| CE N | 373.35 10 | 0.688 % | 0.00257 |
| CE O | 374.13 10 | 0.1221 % | 4.57E-4 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 10.3 | 6.7 % 3 | 6.9E-4 3 |
| 18.2 4 S | 4.5E-7 % 13 | 8.2E-11 24 | |
| XR kα2 | 70.832 | 2.64 % 6 | 0.00187 4 |
| XR kα1 | 72.873 | 4.43 % 10 | 0.00323 7 |
| XR kβ3 | 82.115 | 0.535 % 12 | 4.39E-4 10 |
| XR kβ1 | 82.574 | 1.024 % 23 | 8.45E-4 19 |
| XR kβ2 | 84.865 | 0.373 % 8 | 3.17E-4 7 |
| 266.5 1 | 0.52 % 5 | 0.00138 13 | |
| 374.2 1 | 93.582 % | 0.35019 | |
Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.
| E(γ) | Coincidence |
| 18.2 | 266.5 |
| 266.5 | 18.2 |
Dataset #2:
Author: Balraj Singh Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 130, 21 (2015)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0+X | (7+) | 27.5 s 10 | α | 5990 30 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| ≈5760 | 0.0060 % | 3.5E-4 |