Results:2 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: Coral M. Baglin   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 109, 2033 (2008)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
173
77
Ir
 0.0+X    (11/2-)   2.16 s 4    α   5716 10   
169
75
Re
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  5672 3      11.0 %  0.62

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L     6.7       4.1 % 7   2.7E-4 4 
Auger K    47.0       0.23 % 6   1.1E-4 3 
CE K    64.52 20        5.2 % 11   0.0033 7 
CE L   123.67 20        1.5 % 3   0.0019 4 
CE M   133.27 20        0.37 % 8   4.9E-4 11 
CE N   135.57 20        0.088 % 19   1.2E-4 3 
CE O   136.17 20        0.014 % 3   1.9E-5 4 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l     8.65       1.7 % 3   1.5E-4 3 
XR kα2    59.718       1.4 % 3   8.5E-4 19 
XR kα1    61.141       2.4 % 5   0.0015 3 
XR kβ3    68.995       0.28 % 6   1.9E-4 4 
XR kβ1    69.309       0.54 % 12   3.7E-4 8 
XR kβ2    71.195       0.19 % 4   1.3E-4 3 
   136.2 2        3.9 % 8   0.0053 11 

Dataset #2:

Author: Coral M. Baglin   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 109, 2033 (2008)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
173
77
Ir
 0.0    (1/2+,3/2+)   9.3 s 6    α: 7  5716 10   
169
75
Re
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  5418 4       4.0 %  0.22