Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Authors: Coral M. Baglin, E.A. Mccutchan Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 151, 334 (2018)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 412.610 | (13/2+) | 901 ns 9 | IT: 100 % |
|
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 7.24 | 75 % 7 | 0.0054 5 |
| CE K | 11.1 7 | 74 % 12 | 0.0082 14 |
| Auger K | 51.0 | 4.6 % 7 | 0.0023 4 |
| CE L | 75.6 7 | 12.4 % 20 | 0.0094 15 |
| CE M | 86.2 7 | 2.9 % 5 | 0.0025 4 |
| CE N | 88.8 7 | 0.71 % 11 | 6.3E-4 10 |
| CE O | 89.5 7 | 0.127 % 21 | 1.14E-4 18 |
| CE K | 244.7 6 | 37 % 5 | 0.091 13 |
| CE L | 309.2 6 | 8.3 % 12 | 0.026 4 |
| CE M | 319.8 6 | 2.0 % 3 | 0.0064 9 |
| CE N | 322.4 6 | 0.50 % 7 | 0.00160 23 |
| CE O | 323.1 6 | 0.088 % 13 | 2.9E-4 4 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 9.44 | 37 % 4 | 0.0035 4 |
| XR kα2 | 65.122 | 31 % 4 | 0.0199 24 |
| XR kα1 | 66.831 | 52 % 6 | 0.035 4 |
| XR kβ3 | 75.368 | 6.2 % 7 | 0.0047 6 |
| XR kβ1 | 75.749 | 11.9 % 14 | 0.0090 11 |
| XR kβ2 | 77.831 | 4.2 % 5 | 0.0033 4 |
| 89.5 7 | 9.9 % 16 | 0.0088 14 | |
| 323.1 6 | 52 % 7 | 0.168 24 | |
Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.
| E(γ) | Coincidence |
| 89.5 | 323.1, 323.1 |
| 323.1 | 89.5 |
| 323.1 | 89.5 |
Dataset #2:
Author: Balraj Singh and Jun Chen Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 191, 1 (2023)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | (7/2-) | 45.5 ms 25 | α: 90 7 % | 6607 3 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 6453 3 | 90 % | 5.8 |