Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Author: Balraj Singh and Jun Chen Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 147, 1 (2018)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 0+ | 50.9 s 19 | α: 3.2E-3 10 % | 4500 11 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 4399 12 | 0.0031 % 10 | 1.4E-4 4 |
Dataset #2:
Author: Coral M. Baglin Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 111, 1807 (2010)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 0+ | 50.9 s 19 | ε: 100 % | 3500 30 |
|
Beta+:
| Energy (keV) | End-point energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 961 14 | 2.13E+3 3 | 0.60 % 11 | 0.0058 11 |
| 1039 14 | 2.30E+3 3 | 21 % 4 | 0.22 4 |
Mean beta+ energy: 1.0E+3 keV 3, total beta+ intensity: 22 % 4, mean beta+ dose: 0.22 MeV/Bq-s 7
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 6.35 | 46 % 8 | 0.0029 5 |
| Auger K | 46.2 | 3.1 % 7 | 0.0014 3 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 8.15 | 17 % 3 | 0.00140 25 |
| XR kα2 | 56.28 | 17 % 4 | 0.0098 20 |
| XR kα1 | 57.535 | 30 % 6 | 0.017 4 |
| XR kβ3 | 64.948 | 3.4 % 7 | 0.0022 4 |
| XR kβ1 | 65.222 | 6.6 % 13 | 0.0043 9 |
| XR kβ2 | 66.982 | 2.3 % 5 | 0.0015 3 |
| 173.9 3 | 1.09 % 22 | 0.0019 4 | |
| 178.5 3 | 78 % | 0.139 | |
| 352.2 3 | 1.4 % 3 | 0.0049 9 | |
| Annihil. | 511.0 | 43 % 8 | |
Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.
| E(γ) | Coincidence |
| 173.9 | 178.5 |
| 178.5 | 173.9 |