Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Author: Balraj Singh and Jun Chen Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 191, 1 (2023)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 434.311 | (13/2+) | 700 ns 10 | IT |
|
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 6.88 | 71.9 % 22 | 0.00495 15 |
| CE K | 12.8 8 | 74 % 3 | 0.0095 7 |
| Auger K | 48.3 | 4.5 % 4 | 0.00216 21 |
| CE L | 73.7 8 | 12.1 % 5 | 0.0089 4 |
| CE M | 83.7 8 | 2.78 % 11 | 0.00232 10 |
| CE N | 86.0 8 | 0.68 % 3 | 5.82E-4 25 |
| CE O | 86.6 8 | 0.117 % 5 | 1.01E-4 4 |
| CE K | 273.7 8 | 30.3 % 5 | 0.0828 15 |
| CE L | 334.6 8 | 6.36 % 11 | 0.0213 4 |
| CE M | 344.6 8 | 1.51 % 3 | 0.00520 9 |
| CE N | 346.9 8 | 0.371 % 7 | 0.001286 23 |
| CE O | 347.5 8 | 0.0634 % 11 | 2.20E-4 4 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 8.91 | 32.0 % 15 | 0.00285 13 |
| XR kα2 | 61.486 | 28.5 % 10 | 0.0175 6 |
| XR kα1 | 63.0 | 48.6 % 18 | 0.0306 11 |
| XR kβ3 | 71.079 | 5.70 % 20 | 0.00405 14 |
| XR kβ1 | 71.414 | 11.0 % 4 | 0.0079 3 |
| XR kβ2 | 73.363 | 3.86 % 14 | 0.00283 10 |
| 86.7 8 | 10.6 % 3 | 0.00916 25 | |
| 347.6 8 | 61.4 % 4 | 0.2134 14 | |
Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.
| E(γ) | Coincidence |
| 86.7 | 347.6 |
| 347.6 | 86.7 |
Dataset #2:
Authors: C. W. Reich, Balraj Singh Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 111, 1211 (2010)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 7/2- | 839 ms 5 | α: 51 5 % | 5980 50 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 5839 3 | 50 % | 2.9 |