Results:3 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Author: N. Nica Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 170, 1 (2020)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 158910 | (25/2-) | 1.7 ms 1 | α: 100 % | 6355 6 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 7744 8 | 100 % | 7.744 |
Dataset #2:
Author: N. Nica Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 170, 1 (2020)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 225 | 11/2- | 4.3 ms 1 | α: 100 % | 6355 6 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 6214 4 | 100 % | 6.214 |
Dataset #3:
Author: N. Nica Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 170, 1 (2020)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 1/2+ | 10.1 ms 4 | α: 96.6 12 % | 6355 6 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 6117 4 | 96.6 % | 5.91 |