Results:2 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Author: N. Nica   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 117, 1 (2014)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
152
66
Dy
 0.0    0+   2.38 h 2    α: 0.100 7  3726   
148
64
Gd
 

Alphas:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



  3628 4       0.100 %  0.0036

Dataset #2:

Author: M. J. Martin   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 114, 1497 (2013)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
152
66
Dy
 0.0    0+   2.38 h 2    ε: 99.900 7  600 40   
152
65
Tb
 

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L     5.0      69.2 % 9   0.00346 4 
Auger K    36.0       5.3 % 3   0.00192 12 
CE K   204.93 13        2.03 % 3   0.00416 6 
CE L   248.22 13        0.286 % 5   7.09E-4 12 
CE M   254.96 13        0.0621 % 9   1.583E-4 22 
CE N   256.53 13        0.01422 % 20   3.65E-5 5 
CE O   256.90 13        0.00214 % 3   5.49E-6 8 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l     6.27      15.8 % 7   9.9E-4 4 
XR kα2    43.744      21.9 % 5   0.00958 23 
XR kα1    44.482      39.0 % 9   0.0173 4 
XR kβ3    50.228       4.00 % 9   0.00201 4 
XR kβ1    50.384       7.75 % 19   0.00390 10 
XR kβ2    51.698       2.58 % 6   0.00134 3 
   256.93 13       97.50 % 4   0.25050 16