Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Author: N. Nica and B. Singh Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 181, 1 (2022)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | (11/2-) | 35.2 s 1 | α: 22 3 % | 4695.0 18 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 4321 | 0.0011 % 11 | 5E-5 5 |
| 4373 | 0.0070 % 16 | 3.1E-4 7 |
| 4522.1 | 22 % | 0.99 |
| 4568 | 0.004 % 4 | 2.0E-4 20 |
Dataset #2:
Author: N. Nica and B. Singh Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 181, 1 (2022)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 41.02 | (1/2+) | 47.2 s 13 | α: 80 +15-20 % | 4695.0 18 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 4256 | 0.19 % 4 | 0.0080 18 |
| 4357 | 0.008 % 8 | 3E-4 4 |
| 4562 | 0.024 % 25 | 0.0011 11 |
| 4610.6 22 | 80 % | 3.7 |