Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Authors: Yu. Khazov, A. Rodionov and G. Shulyak Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 136, 163 (2016)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 0+ | 7.17 m 5 | α | 4351.3 15 |
|
Alphas:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 4232 4 | 33.6 % | 1.42 |
Dataset #2:
Authors: S. K. Basu, A. A. Sonzogni Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 114, 435 (2013)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0 | 0+ | 7.17 m 5 | ε: 64 5 % | 1796 8 |
|
Beta+:
| Energy (keV) | End-point energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 183.0 36 | 377 8 | 0.052 % 7 | 9.6E-5 12 |
Mean beta+ energy: 1.8E+2 keV 3, total beta+ intensity: 0.052 % 7, mean beta+ dose: 9.6E-5 MeV/Bq-s 21
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 5.0 | 44 % 3 | 0.00219 15 |
| Auger K | 36.0 | 3.5 % 3 | 0.00126 12 |
| CE K | 345.2 3 | 0.451 % | 0.001558 |
| CE L | 388.5 3 | 0.0622 % | 2.42E-4 |
| CE M | 395.2 3 | 0.01346 % | 5.32E-5 |
| CE N | 396.8 3 | 0.00310 % | 1.229E-5 |
| CE O | 397.2 3 | 4.70E-4 % | 1.87E-6 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 6.27 | 10.0 % 8 | 6.3E-4 5 |
| XR kα2 | 43.744 | 14.4 % 12 | 0.0063 5 |
| XR kα1 | 44.482 | 25.5 % 20 | 0.0114 9 |
| XR kβ3 | 50.228 | 2.62 % 21 | 0.00132 11 |
| XR kβ1 | 50.384 | 5.1 % 4 | 0.00256 21 |
| XR kβ2 | 51.698 | 1.69 % 14 | 8.8E-4 7 |
| 397.2 3 | 63 % | 0.252 | |
| Annihil. | 511.0 | 0.105 % 13 | |