Results:2 different decay possibilities were found
Dataset #1:
Authors: T.D. Johnson, D. Symochko, M. Fadil, and J.K. Tuli Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 112, 1949 (2011)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 2- | 19.12 h 4 | ε: 0.0164 8 % | 745.8 24 |
|
Electrons:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| Auger L | 3.94 | 0.0123 % 9 | 4.8E-7 3 |
| Auger K | 28.4 | 0.00119 % 12 | 3.4E-7 3 |
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| XR l | 4.84 | 0.00175 % 15 | 8.5E-8 7 |
| XR kα2 | 34.279 | 0.0034 % 3 | 1.17E-6 10 |
| XR kα1 | 34.72 | 0.0062 % 6 | 2.16E-6 19 |
| XR kβ3 | 39.17 | 6.0E-4 % 5 | 2.36E-7 21 |
| XR kβ1 | 39.258 | 0.00117 % 10 | 4.6E-7 4 |
| XR kβ2 | 40.228 | 3.8E-4 % 3 | 1.51E-7 13 |
| 642.0 10 | 0.00221 % | 1.42E-5 | |
Dataset #2:
Authors: T.D. Johnson, D. Symochko, M. Fadil, and J.K. Tuli Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 112, 1949 (2011)
| Parent Nucleus | Parent E(level) | Parent Jπ | Parent T1/2 | Decay Mode | GS-GS Q-value (keV) | Daughter Nucleus | Decay Scheme | ENSDF file | ||
| 0.0 | 2- | 19.12 h 4 | β-: 99.9836 8 % | 2162.2 15 |
|
Beta-:
| Energy (keV) | End-point energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) |
| 20.14 45 | 77.8 17 | 0.023 % 4 | 4.6E-6 8 |
| 182.78 58 | 586.6 16 | 3.7 % 5 | 0.0068 9 |
| 834.20 66 | 2162.2 15 | 96.3 % 5 | 0.803 4 |
Mean beta- energy: 810 keV 7, total beta- intensity: 100.0 % 7, mean beta- dose: 0.810 MeV/Bq-s 9
Gamma and X-ray radiation:
| Energy (keV) | Intensity (%) | Dose ( MeV/Bq-s ) | |
| 508.8 5 | 0.023 % 3 | 1.16E-4 16 | |
| 1575.6 5 | 3.7 % | 0.058 | |
Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.
| E(γ) | Coincidence |
| 508.8 | 1575.6 |
| 1575.6 | 508.8 |