Results:3 different decay possibilities were found


Dataset #1:

Authors: S. Kumar, J. Chen and F.G. Kondev   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 137, 1 (2016)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
109
48
Cd
 462.74    11/2-   10.6 µs 4    IT       
109
48
Cd
 

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L     2.72      17.98 % 19   4.89E-4 5 
Auger K    19.3       2.78 % 8   5.37E-4 15 
CE K   176.49 20        5.38 % 8   0.00949 15 
CE L   199.18 20        0.662 % 9   0.001319 19 
CE M   202.43 20        0.1272 % 19   2.58E-4 4 
CE N   203.09 20        0.0227 % 4   4.61E-5 8 
CE O   203.20 20        0.001308 % 19   2.66E-6 4 
CE K   232.8 3       12.23 % 18   0.0285 4 
CE L   255.5 3        1.75 % 3   0.00446 7 
CE M   258.7 3        0.341 % 5   8.82E-4 13 
CE N   259.4 3        0.0605 % 10   1.570E-4 25 
CE O   259.5 3        0.00330 % 5   8.55E-6 13 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l     3.13       1.21 % 3   3.80E-5 10 
XR kα2    22.984       4.31 % 13   9.9E-4 3 
XR kα1    23.174       8.12 % 25   0.00188 6 
XR kβ3    26.06       0.703 % 21   1.83E-4 5 
XR kβ1    26.095       1.35 % 4   3.53E-4 11 
XR kβ2    26.644       0.349 % 11   9.3E-5 3 
   203.2 2       93.81 % 9   0.1906 3 
   259.5 3       85.61 % 18   0.2222 5 

Gamma Coincidence Data:

For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given.
If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given.

E(γ)Coincidence
   203.2259.5, 259.5
   259.5203.2
   259.5203.2

Dataset #2:

Authors: S. Kumar, J. Chen and F.G. Kondev   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 137, 1 (2016)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
109
48
Cd
 59.95    1/2+   11.8 µs 16    IT       
109
48
Cd
 

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L     2.72      75.7 % 24   0.00206 6 
Auger K    19.3       8.7 % 5   0.00167 9 
CE K    33.2 5       55 % 3   0.0182 9 
CE L    55.9 5       28.6 % 17   0.0160 10 
CE M    59.1 5        5.8 % 3   0.00340 20 
CE N    59.8 5        0.94 % 5   5.6E-4 3 
CE O    59.9 5        0.0093 % 5   5.6E-6 3 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l     3.13       5.11 % 23   1.60E-4 7 
XR kα2    22.984      13.4 % 8   0.00308 17 
XR kα1    23.174      25.2 % 14   0.0058 3 
XR kβ3    26.06       2.18 % 12   5.7E-4 3 
XR kβ1    26.095       4.21 % 24   0.00110 6 
XR kβ2    26.644       1.08 % 6   2.89E-4 16 
    59.9 5        9.7 % 4   0.00581 24 

Dataset #3:

Authors: S. Kumar, J. Chen and F.G. Kondev   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 137, 1 (2016)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
109
48
Cd
 0.0    5/2+   461.9 d 4    ε: 100  215.5 18   
109
47
Ag
 

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L     2.61     167.3 % 9   0.004367 24 
Auger K    18.5      20.8 % 5   0.00385 9 
CE K    62.5196 10       41.8 % 8   0.0261 5 
CE L    84.2278 10       44.2 % 9   0.0372 8 
CE M    87.3161 10        9.05 % 20   0.00790 17 
CE N    87.9384 10        1.41 % 3   0.00124 3 

Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l     2.98      10.4 % 3   3.09E-4 8 
XR kα2    21.99      29.8 % 9   0.00655 19 
XR kα1    22.163      56.1 % 16   0.0124 4 
XR kβ3    24.912       4.80 % 14   0.00120 3 
XR kβ1    24.943       9.3 % 3   0.00231 7 
XR kβ2    25.455       2.31 % 6   5.89E-4 16 
    88.0336 10        3.644 % 16   0.003208 14