References quoted in the XUNDL dataset: 90ZR 90Y B- DECAY:64.053 H:XUNDL-8
7 references found.
Clicking on a keynumber will list datasets that reference the given article.
Phys.Rev. 102, 415 (1956)
J.S.Greenberg, M.Deutsch
Positrons from the Decay of P32 and Y90
Z.Phys. 164, 166 (1961)
H.Langhoff, H.H.Hennies
Zum experimentellen Nachweis von Zweiquantenzerfall beim 0+-0+-Ubergang des Zr90
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 90Y; measured not abstracted; deduced nuclear properties.
Appl.Radiat.Isot. 60, 741 (2004)
K.Kossert, H.Schrader
Activity standardization by liquid scintillation counting and half-life measurements of 90Y
RADIOACTIVITY 90Y(β-); measured T1/2. Liquid scintillation, ionization chamber.
doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2003.12.009
Appl.Radiat.Isot. 65, 318 (2007)
R.G.Selwyn, R.J.Nickles, B.R.Thomadsen, L.A.DeWerd, J.A.Micka
A new internal pair production branching ratio of 90Y: The development of a non-destructive assay for 90Y and 90Sr
RADIOACTIVITY 90Y(β-); measured Eγ, Iγ. 90Zr transition deduced branching ratio for internal pair production.
doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.08.009
Chin.Phys.C 41, 030003 (2017)
M.Wang, G.Audi, F.G.Kondev, W.J.Huang, S.Naimi, X.Xu
The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references
ATOMIC MASSES A=1-295; compiled, evaluated atomic masses data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/3/030003
Appl.Radiat.Isot. 156, 108942 (2020)
P.Dryak, J.Solc
Measurement of the branching ratio related to the internal pair production of Y-90
RADIOACTIVITY 90Y(β-); analyzed available data; deduced the number of positron-electron pair creation in the E0 transition between the 1760.7 keV level and the ground level of the Zr-90 nucleus at the Y-90 decay.
doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108942
Appl.Radiat.Isot. 156, 108943 (2020)
L.Pibida, B.E.Zimmerman, L.King, R.Fitzgerald, D.E.Bergeron, E.Napoli, J.T.Cessna
Determination of the internal pair production branching ratio of 90Y
RADIOACTIVITY 90Y(β-); measured decay products, Eγ, Iγ, Eβ, Iβ; deduced the internal pair production branching ratio. Comparison with DDEP evaluation.
doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108943