References quoted in the ENSDF dataset: 253RF ADOPTED LEVELS
32 references found.
Clicking on a keynumber will list datasets that reference the given article.
CERN-76-13, p.542 (1976)
G.N.Flerov
The Dubna Programme on Heavy and Superheavy Elements
RADIOACTIVITY 242Fm, 250No, 256,255,254,253Rf, 257,255Db, 259Sg, 261Bh; measured T1/2. Review.
Nukleonika 23, 125 (1978)
K.Pomorski
Spontaneous Fission Half Lives for Odd A Nuclei with Z ≥ 96
RADIOACTIVITY 243Md, 242Fm, 259Rf(SF); calculated fission barriers, effective mass parameters. 259Rf, 261Db(SF), 240,242,244,246,248,250,252,241,243,245,247,249,251,253Cm, 243,245,247,249,251,253,255Bk, 244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255Cf, 242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258Fm, 248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260No, 251,253,255,257,259,261Lr, 250Rf, 251Rf, 252Rf, 253Rf, 254Rf, 255Rf, 256Rf, 257Rf, 258Rf, 260Rf, 261Rf, 262Rf, 256Sg, 257Sg, 258Sg, 259Sg, 260Sg, 261Sg, 262Rf, 263Sg, 264Sg, 260Hs, 261Hs, 262Hs, 263Hs, 264Hs, 265Hs, 266Hs(SF); calculated T1/2.
Nucl.Phys. A444, 1 (1985)
S.Cwiok, Z.Lojewski, V.V.Pashkevich
Fission Barriers of Odd-Mass Nuclei and Odd Nuclei with 100 ≤ Z ≤ 111
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 259,261,257,255,253,251,249,247,245,243Fm, 246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263Md, 243,245,246,249,251,253,255,257,259,261,263No, 254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265Lr, 251,253,255,257,259,261,263,265Rf, 254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267Db, 257,259,261,263,265,267Sg, 258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271Bh, 259,261,263,265,267,269,271Hs, 262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271Mt, 263,265,267,269,271,273,275Ds, 267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278Rg; calculated deformation energy along fission barrier vs β2, fission barrier vs neutron number. Strutinsky method, realistic Woods-Saxon potential.
doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(85)90288-X
Nucl.Phys. A573, 356 (1994)
S.Cwiok, S.Hofmann, W.Nazarewicz
Shell Structure of the Heaviest Elements
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=95-111; N=149-162; compiled, reviewed mass excess, equilibrium deformations, single nucleon states binding energy, Q(α).
doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(94)90349-2
Z.Phys. A359, 415 (1997)
F.P.Hessberger, S.Hofmann, V.Ninov, P.Armbruster, H.Folger, G.Munzenberg, H.J.Schott, A.G.Popeko, A.V.Yeremin, A.N.Andreyev, S.Saro
Spontaneous Fission and Alpha-Decay Properties of Neutron Deficient Isotopes 257-253104 and 258106
RADIOACTIVITY 253,254Rf, 258Sg(SF), 255,256,257Rf(α) [from 204,206,208Pb(50Ti, xn), E=4.8-5.1 MeV/nucleon; 209Bi(51V, X), E=4.77-4.99 MeV/nucleon]; measured Eα, T1/2. 257Rf, 253No deduced levels.
NUCLEAR REACTIONS 204,206,208Pb(50Ti, xn), E=4.8-5.1 MeV/nucleon; 209Bi(51V, X), E=4.77-4.99 MeV/nucleon; measured Eα, Iα, residuals fission fragments; deduced evidence for 258Sg, 253,254Rf.
J.Phys.(London) G25, 877 (1999)
F.P.Hessberger
GSI Experiments in the Region of Heaviest Elements
NUCLEAR REACTIONS 209Bi(50Ti, X), E=4.6-5.1 MeV/nucleon; measured isotopic yields; deduced evidence for 256Db, 253Lr.
RADIOACTIVITY 256,257,258Db, 252,253Lr(α) [from 209Bi(50Ti, X)]; 265Hs, 266Mt(α) [from 208Pb, 209Bi(58Fe, n)]; measured Eα, T1/2. 265Hs, 266Mt deduced levels. 253,254Rf, 258Sg(SF); measured T1/2. 257Rf, 257Db, 261Sg, 265Hs deduced fission branching upper limits.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/25/4/059
Ann.Nucl.Energy 31, 323 (2004)
Y.Ronen
Indications of the validity of the liquid drop model for spontaneous fission half-lives
RADIOACTIVITY 230,232Th, 231Pa, 232,233,234,235,236,238U, 237Np, 236,238,239,240,241,242,244Pu, 241,243Am, 240,242,243,244,245,246,248,250Cm, 246,248,249,250,252,254,256Cf, 253,254,255Es, 246,248,250,252,254,255,256,257,258,259Fm, 259Md, 250,252,256,258No, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,262Rf, 255,256,257,261,262Db, 259,260,263Sg, 261Bh(SF); analyzed spontaneous fission T1/2 relative to liquid drop model predictions.
doi: 10.1016/S0306-4549(03)00221-4
Acta Phys.Pol. B36, 3115 (2005)
A.Parkhomenko, A.Sobiczewski
Neutron one-quasiparticle states of heaviest nuclei
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 235Th, 237,239U, 239,241,243,245,247,249Pu, 241,243,245,247,249,251,253Cm, 243,245,247,249,251,253,255,257Cf, 245,247,249,251,253,255,257,259,261Fm, 247,249,251,253,255,257,259,261,263No, 251,253,255,257,259,261,263,265Rf, 253,255,257,259,261,263,265,267Sg, 261,263,265,267,269Hs, 267,269,271Ds; calculated neutron single-quasiparticle energies. Macroscopic-microscopic approach.
Nucl.Phys. A759, 64 (2005)
Z.Ren, C.Xu
Spontaneous fission half-lives of heavy nuclei in ground state and in isomeric state
RADIOACTIVITY 235,236m,238mU, 237mNp, 235m,236m,237m,238m,239,239m,240m,241m,242m,243m,244m,245mPu, 237m,238m,239m,240m,241,241m,242m,243,243m,244m,245m,246mAm, 241m,242m,243,243m,244m,245,245mCm, 242m,244m,245m,249Bk, 244,247,249Cf, 253,255Es, 251,253,255,257,259Fm, 245,247,260Md, 259,261Lr, 253,255,259Rf, 255,257,260,263Db, 261,263,265,267Sg, 263,265,267,269Bh, 269,271,273,275Ds, 271,273,275,277Rg(SF); calculated T1/2. Several formulas compared with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.04.019
Phys.Rev. C 74, 034316 (2006)
T.M.Shneidman, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko, R.V.Jolos
Possible alternative parity bands in the heaviest nuclei
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 239,240U, 241,242,243,244,245Pu, 243,244,245,246,247,248Cm, 245,246,247,248,249,250Cf, 247,248,249,250,251,252Fm, 249,250,251,252,253,254No, 253,254,255,256Rf, 258Sg; calculated levels, J, π, rotational bands, transition dipole and quadrupole moments. Cluster model.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.034316
Phys.Rev. C 76, 047304 (2007)
H.F.Zhang, G.Royer
Theoretical and experimental α decay half-lives of the heaviest odd-Z elements and general predictions
RADIOACTIVITY 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268Rf, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270Db, 258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272Sg, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274Bh, 263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277Hs, 265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279Mt, 267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281Ds, 272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283Rg, 277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285Cn, 283,284,285,286,287Nh, 285,286,287,288,289Fl, 287,288,289,290,291Mc, 289,290,291,292Lv, 291,292Ts, 293Og(α); calculated half-lives, Q(α), comparison with experimental values.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.76.047304
Phys.Rev. C 77, 064310 (2008)
T.Dong, Z.Ren
Improved version of a binding energy formula for heavy and superheavy nuclei with Z≥ =90 and N ≥ =140
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238Pa, 233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242Np, 238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246Am, 243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251Bk, 251,252,253,254,255Es; calculated binding energies. 241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260Fm, 240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262Md, 237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264No, 246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265Lr, 242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266Rf, 252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267Db, 248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267Sg, 258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267Bh, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270Hs, 264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271Mt, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270Ds; calculated Qα, half-life, single particle binding energies, separation energies.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.064310
Phys.Rev. C 77, 037602 (2008)
G.Royer, H.F.Zhang
Recent α decay half-lives and analytic expression predictions including superheavy nuclei
RADIOACTIVITY 105Te, 156Er, 158Yb, 160,174Hf, 158,168W, 162,164Os, 166,168,170Pt, 172,174,188Hg, 178,180,184,186,188,190,192,194Pb, 188,189,190,192,210Po, 196,198Rn, 202,204Ra, 210,212Th, 218,220,224,226U, 228,230Pu, 238Cm, 258No, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,262,263,264,265,267,268Rf, 255,256,257,258,259,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270Db, 258,259,261,262,264,267,268,269,270,271,272Sg, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274Bh, 263,266,267,268,269,270,271,273,274,275,276,277Hs, 265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279Mt, 267,268,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,281Ds, 273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283Rg, 277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285Cn, 282,283,284,285,286,287Nh, 285,286,287,288,289Fl, 287,288,289,290,291Mc, 289,290,291,292,293Lv, 291,292Ts, 293,294Og(α); calculated half-lives, Qα using density dependent effective interaction and Viola-Seaborg-Sobiczewski formulas. Comparison with experimental data for known isotopes.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.037602
Chin.Phys.C 33, Supplement 1, 5 (2009)
T.-K.Dong, Z.-Z.Ren, C.Xu
Research on some superheavy nuclei
RADIOACTIVITY 251,252,253,254,255,256,257No, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259Lr, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259Rf, 256,257,258,259,260,261Db, 258,259,260,261,262,263Sg, 260,261,262Bh, 264,265,266,267Hs, 264,265,266,267Mt(α); calculated α-decay energies, T1/2. Local-binding energy and Viola-Seaborg formulas.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/33/S1/002
Phys.Rev. C 85, 054303 (2012)
H.Jiang, G.J.Fu, B.Sun, M.Liu, N.Wang, M.Wang, Y.G.Ma, C.J.Lin, Y.M.Zhao, Y.H.Zhang, Z.Ren, A.Arima
Predictions of unknown masses and their applications
ATOMIC MASSES Z=1-184, N=1-184; analyzed masses for 1566 nuclei using extrapolation approach and shell correction term, S(n), S(2n), S(p), and S(2p); one-neutron and one-proton drip nuclei, R-process nucleosynthesis and astrophysical implications. Comparison with AME-2011 interim mass evaluation, and with Duflo-Zuker model. 85Mo, 87,88,89Tc, 123Ag, 140I, 222Po, 226,227,228Rn, 233,234Ra, 235Ac; compared predicted masses with measured values.
RADIOACTIVITY 248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257No, 251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259Lr, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261Rf, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262Db, 256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263Sg(α); calculated Q(α), half-life. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.054303
Rom.J.Phys. 59, 724 (2014)
I.Silisteanu, C.I.Anghel
Competition between Alpha-Decay and Spontaneous Fission in Rf, Db, and Sg Isotopes
RADIOACTIVITY 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267Rf, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271Db, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,274Sg(α), (SF); calculated T1/2 for α-decay and spontaneous fission.
Nucl.Phys. A944, 308 (2015)
M.Asai, F.P.Hessberger, A.Lopez-Martens
Nuclear structure of elements with 100 ≤ Z ≤ 109 from alpha spectroscopy
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 245Pu, 247Cm, 249Cf, 251Fm, 253No, 255Rf, 257Sg, 259Hs, 249Cm, 251Cf, 253Fm, 255No, 257Rf, 259Sg, 261Hs, 249Pu, 251Cm, 253Cf, 255Fm, 257No, 259Rf, 261Sg, 263Hs; calculated energy levels, J, π, Nilsson single-particle energies, deformation parameters. Comparison with available data.
RADIOACTIVITY 247Cm, 249Cf, 251Fm, 253No, 255Rf, 257Sg, 251Cf, 253Fm, 255No, 257Rf, 259Sg, 261Hs(α), 247Cm, 249Cf, 251Fm, 253No(IT), 249Cm, 251Cf, 253Fm, 257Rf, 259Sg(IT), 253Cf, 255Fm, 257No, 259Rf, 261Sg(α), 259No, 261Rf(α); analyzed decay products, Eα, Iα, Eγ, Iγ, α-γ-coin.; deduced energy levels, J, π, T1/2. Internal-conversion-electron coincidence spectroscopy.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.06.011
J.Phys.(London) G42, 085101 (2015)
X.J.Bao, S.Q.Guo, H.F.Zhang, Y.Z.Xing, J.M.Dong, J.Q.Li
Competition between α-decay and spontaneous fission for superheavy nuclei
RADIOACTIVITY 232Th, 234,236,238U, 236,238,240,242,244Pu, 240,242,244,246,248,250Cm, 242,244,246,248,250,252,254Cf, 246,248Fm, 256,258,260Rf, 264,266,270Hs, 270Ds, 284Cn, 286,288Fl, 290,292Lv, 294Og, 235U, 239Pu, 243,245Cm, 237,249Cf, 255,257,259Fm, 253,255,259Rf, 293,294Ts, 287,289,290Mc, 282,283,285,286Nh, 275,278Mt, 271,274Bh, 291,293Lv, 287,289Fl, 283,285Cn, 278,279,280,281,282Rg, 279,281Ds, 274,275,276Mt, 275Hs, 270,272Bh, 266,267,268,270Db(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/42/8/085101
Bull.Rus.Acad.Sci.Phys. 82, 691 (2018)
M.L.Markova, T.M.Shneidman, N.V.Antonenko, T.Yu.Tretyakova
Effect of Coriolis Interaction on the Decay of Isotones with N = 149 and N = 153
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 243,247Pu, 245,249Cm, 247,251Cf, 249,253Fm, 251,255No, 253,257Rf; calculated single-particle energy spectra, J, π, deformation of odd isotones with N=149, 153 using Two-Center Shell Model (TCSM) with K-mixing of the basis wave functions and inclusion of the Coriolis correction; deduced estimates for the B(E2) transitions to the gs, T1/2 of the isotones.
doi: 10.3103/S1062873818060187
At.Data Nucl.Data Tables 125, 1 (2019)
P.Moller, M.R.Mumpower, T.Kawano, W.D.Myers
Nuclear properties for astrophysical and radioactive-ion-beam applications (II)
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=8-136; calculated the ground-state odd-proton and odd-neutron spins and parities, proton and neutron pairing gaps, one- and two-neutron separation energies, quantities related to β-delayed one- and two-neutron emission probabilities, average energy and average number of emitted neutrons, β-decay energy release and T1/2 with respect to Gamow-Teller decay with a phenomenological treatment of first-forbidden decays, one- and two-proton separation energies, and α-decay energy release and half-life.
doi: 10.1016/j.adt.2018.03.003
Nucl.Phys. A1004, 122035 (2020)
U.K.Singh, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, D.T.Akrawy, G.Saxena
Study of decay modes in transfermium isotopes
RADIOACTIVITY 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260Md, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262No, 252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266Lr, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265Rf, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270Db, 258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271Sg, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274Bh, 263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277Hs, 266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278Mt(EC), (β-), (α), (SF); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122035
Eur.Phys.J. A 57, 41 (2021)
A.I.Budaca
Screening amendment to the universal decay law for alpha decay
RADIOACTIVITY 186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219Po, 194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222Rn, 202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226Ra, 208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232Th, 214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238U, 228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244Pu, 234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250Cm, 240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254Cf, 246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256Fm, 251,252,253,254,255,256No, 254,260,264,266,268Rf, 258,262,264,266,268,270,272Sg, 272,274,276Hs, 268,272,274,276,278,280Ds, 276,278,280,282,284Cn, 284Fl, 253,259,261,263,265,267Rf, 259,261,263,265,267,269,271,273Sg, 263,265,267,269,271,273,275,277Hs, 267,269,271,273,275,277,279,281Ds, 277,279,281,283,285Cn, 285,287,289Fl, 289,291,293Lv(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00359-1
Phys.Rev. C 103, 024314 (2021)
J.Jia, Y.Qian, Z.Ren
Systematics of α-decay energies in the valence correlation scheme
RADIOACTIVITY 248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256No, 251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259Lr, 253,254,255,256,257,258Rf, 277,285Cn, 284,285,286Nh, 284,285,286,287,288,289Fl, 287,288,289,290Mc, 290,291,292,293Lv, 293,294Ts, 294Og(α); calculated Q(α) from analysis of evaluated Q(α) data for Z=52-118 nuclei in AME2016 using a simple valence correlation scheme (VCS), and compared with available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024314
Phys.Rev. C 104, L031303 (2021)
J.Khuyagbaatar, H.Brand, R.A.Cantemir, Ch.E.Dullmann, F.P.Hessberger, E.Jager, B.Kindler, J.Krier, N.Kurz, B.Lommel, B.Schausten, A.Yakushev
Spontaneous fission instability of the neutron-deficient No and Rf isotopes: The new isotope 249No
RADIOACTIVITY 253,253mRf(SF); 253Rf, 249No(α)[253Rf from 204Pb(50Ti, n), E=234.3 MeV]; measured evaporation residues (ERs), (ER)(fission)- and (ER)α-correlated events, Eα, Iα, partial half-lives of two fission activities of 253Rf, α-decay half-life of newly discovered 249No isotope from the α decay mode of 253Rf in (ER)-α-α-α correlated events using gas-filled TransActinide Separator and Chemistry Apparatus (TASCA) at UNILAC, GSI. 253Rf; deduced another high-lying ≈0.6-μs isomer. 251mNo; discussed in Supplemental Material of the paper a possible identification method for direct fission from an isomeric state in 251No. Presence of two fission activities in 253Rf proposed as benchmark cases for the theoretical description of the influence of single-particle orbitals on the fission process.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L031303
Chin.Phys.C 45, 024105 (2021)
N.-N.Ma, X.-J.Bao, H.-F.Zhang
Diffuseness effect and radial basis function network for optimizing α decay calculations
RADIOACTIVITY 256Rf, 258Rf, 263Rf, 257,258,259Db, 263Db, 259,260,261,262Sg, 269Sg, 271Sg, 260Bh, 261Bh, 264Bh, 266,267Bh, 270Bh, 272Bh, 274Bh, 264,265,266,267Hs, 270Hs, 273Hs, 268Mt, 274,275,276Mt, 278Mt, 267Ds, 269,270,271Ds, 273Ds, 277Ds, 281Ds, 272Rg, 274Rg, 278,279,280Rg, 281Cn, 285Cn, 278Nh, 282,283,284,285,286Nh, 286,287,288,289Fl, 287,288,289,290Mc, 290,291,292,293Lv, 293,294Ts, 294Og, 252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288Rf, 272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310Fl, 286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314,315,316119, 292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318120(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
Phys.Rev. C 104, 024617 (2021)
K.P.Santhosh, C.Nithya, T.A.Jose
Decay modes of superheavy nuclei using a modified generalized liquid drop model and a mass-inertia-dependent approach for spontaneous fission
RADIOACTIVITY 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268Rf, 258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272Sg, 263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277Hs, 267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281Ds, 276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285Cn, 284,285,286,287,288,289Fl, 289,290,291,292,293Lv, 293,294,295Og(α), (SF); 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270Db, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274Bh, 265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279Mt, 272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283Rg, 278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287Nh, 287,288,289,290,291Mc, 291,292,293,294Ts(α), (SF); calculated α decay and SF decay T1/2 of superheavy nuclei using modified generalized liquid drop model (MGLDM) with the proximity 77 parametrization for α decay, and a mass-inertia-dependent approach for spontaneous fission. Comparison with available experimental T1/2.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024617
Nucl.Phys. A1006, 122066 (2021)
U.K.Singh, R.Sharma, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena
Structural properties and α-decay chains of transfermium nuclei (101 ≤ Z ≤ 110)
RADIOACTIVITY 235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287Md, 238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288No, 241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289Lr, 243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290Rf, 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291Db, 248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Sg, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293Bh, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294Hs, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295Mt, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296Ds(α), (SF); calculated potential energy surfaces (PESs), occupancies of neutron single particle states, rms α-decay T1/2, T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122066
Int.J.Mod.Phys. E30, 2150025 (2021)
E.V.Vladimirova, B.S.Ishkhanov, M.V.Simonov, S.V.Sidorov, T.Yu.Tretyakova
Residual np-interaction and mass predictions in transfermium region
RADIOACTIVITY 246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258Md, 248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259No, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260Lr, 252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261Rf, 254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262Db, 256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263Sg(α); calculated T1/2, Q-values. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301321500257
Chin.Phys.C 45, 030003 (2021)
M.Wang, W.J.Huang, F.G.Kondev, G.Audi, S.Naimi
The AME 2020 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references
ATOMIC MASSES A=1-295; compiled, evaluated atomic masses, mass excess, β-, ββ and ββββ-decay, binding, neutron and proton separation energies, decay and reaction Q-value data.
Phys.Rev. C 105, L021306 (2022)
A.Lopez-Martens, K.Hauschild, A.I.Svirikhin, Z.Asfari, M.L.Chelnokov, V.I.Chepigin, O.Dorvaux, M.Forge, B.Gall, A.V.Isaev, I.N.Izosimov, K.Kessaci, A.A.Kuznetsova, O.N.Malyshev, R.S.Mukhin, A.G.Popeko, Yu.A.Popov, B.Sailaubekov, E.A.Sokol, M.S.Tezekbayeva, A.V.Yeremin
Fission properties of 253Rf and the stability of neutron-deficient Rf isotopes
RADIOACTIVITY 253Rf(SF)(α) [from 204Pb(50Ti, n), E=244 MeV];249No(α)[from 253Rf(SF)(α)];245Fm(α)[from 249No(α)]; 251No(SF)(α)[from 204Pb(48Ca, n); measured fission fragments, Eγ, Iγ, Eα, Iα, (implant)α-coin, (implant)γ-coin. 253Rf; deduced levels, J, π, T1/2 for two isomeric fissioning states, branching ratio for α-decay. 251No; deduced T1/2. 252Rf; deduced T1/2 based on extracted hindrance factor and systematics. U400 Cyclotron at the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions in Dubna with separator for heavy element spectroscopy (SHELS). GABRIELA detector consisting of DSSD and HPGe detectors.
NUCLEAR REACTIONS 204Pb(50Ti, n), E=244 MeV; measured fission fragments from 253Rf decay, Eα, Iα; deduced σ.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L021306
Nucl.Phys. A1021, 122427 (2022)
G.Royer, Q.Ferrier, M.Pineau
Alpha and cluster decays of superheavy elements and 2p radioactivity of medium nuclei
RADIOACTIVITY 252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268Rf, 258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272Sg, 262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278Hs, 260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282Ds, 276,278,280,282,284,286Cn, 284,286,288,290Fl, 290,292Lv, 294Og, 296,298120, 253,255,257,259,261,263,265,267,269Rf, 257,259,261,263,265,267,269,271Sg, 263,265,267,269,271,273,275,277Hs, 267,269,271,273,275,277,279,281Ds, 277,279,281,283,285Cn, 285,287,289Fl, 289,291,293Lv, 293,295Og, 295,297120, 255,257,259,261,263,265,267,269,271Db, 259,261,263,265,267,269,271,273,275Bh, 265,267,269,271,273,275,277,279Mt, 271,273,275,277,279,281,283Rg, 277,279,281,283,285,287Nh, 287,289,291Mc, 293Ts, 295,297119, 256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270Db, 260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274Bh, 266,268,270,272,274,276,278Mt, 272,274,276,278,280,282Rg, 278,280,282,284,286Nh, 286,288,290Mc, 292,294Ts, 294,296119(α), 221,222,223,224Ra, 226Ra, 225Ac(14C), 228Th(20O), 230Th, 231Pa(24Ne), 230U(22Ne), 232,233,234U(24Ne), 234,235U, 236Pu, 238Pu(28Mg), 238Pu(32Si), 242Cm(34Si), 253Rf(8Be), 257Rf(47K), 258Rf(48K), 255Db(8Be), 265Db(56Ti), 258Sg(8Be), 260Bh(50Ti), 264Hs(64Ni), 267Ds(58Fe), (60Fe), 268Ds(60Ni), 269Ds(60Fe), 271Ds(62Fe), (63Co), 272Ds(64Co), (64Ni), 273Ds(65Co), 274Ds(66Co), 275Ds(67Co), 281,282Ds(76Zn), 272Rg(62Fe), (63Ni), 274Rg(65Ni), 276Rg(67Ni), 278Rg(69Ni), 280Rg(71Ni), 282Rg(72Cu), 282,283Rg(76Zn), 285Cn(72Zn), (73Zn), (75Zn), (77Zn), 286Cn(48Ca), (74Ni), (78Ni), 286Nh(49Ca), (50Ca), (74Cu), (75Cu), (76Cu), (76Zn), (77Zn), (78Ga), 287Fl, 289Fl(48Ca), (75Cu), (76Zn), (77Zn), (78Zn), (79Zn), (80Zn), 293Lv(54Ti), 294Og(8Be), 12O, 16Ne, 19Mg, 45Fe, 48Ni, 54Zn, 67Kr(2p); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122427
Nucl.Phys. A1028, 122528 (2022)
F.Xing, H.Qi, J.Cui, Y.Gao, Y.Wang, J.Gu, G.Yong
An improved Gamow-like formula for α-decay half-lives
RADIOACTIVITY 214,215,216,217,218U, 219,220,221,222,223,224Np, 221,222,223,224,225,226,227Pu, 224,225,226,227,228Am, 231,232Cm, 233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242Bk, 234,235,236Cf, 237,238,239Es, 239,240,241,242,243,244Fm, 241,242,243Md, 246,247,248,249,250No, 249,250,251Lr, 251,252,253,254Rf, 253,254,255Db, 256,257,258Sg, 258,259,260,261,262,263Bh, 261,262Hs, 263,264,265Mt, 261,262,263,264,265,266Ds, 266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273Rg, 270,271,272,273,274,275,276Cn, 272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290Nh, 278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291Fl, 281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Mc, 283,284,285,286,287,288,289Lv, 285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Ts, 288,289,290,291,292,293Og, 295Og, 290,291,292,293,294,295,296119, 291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300120, 287,288,289,290,291Og, 283,284Lv, 279,280,281Fl, 275,276Cn, 271,272,273Ds, 294120, 268,269Hs, 264,265Sg, 281Fl(α); calculated T1/2; deduced an improved Gamow-like (IMGL) formula parameters. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122528