Phys.Rev. C 101, 014318 (2020)

V.Soma, P.Navratil, F.Raimondi, C.Barbieri, T.Duguet

Novel chiral Hamiltonian and observables in light and medium-mass nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ³H, ^3,4,6,8He, ^6,7,9Li, ^7,8,9,10Be, ^10,11B, ^12,13,14C, ¹⁴N, ^14,16O, ³⁶Ca, ⁶⁸Ni; calculated ground-state energies. ^6,7,9Li, ^8,9Be, ^10,11B, ^12,13C; calculated levels, J, π. ^{12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28}O, ^{34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,70}Ca, ^{48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78}Ni; calculated total binding energies, S(2n), rms charge radii. ¹⁶O, ⁴⁰Ca, ⁵⁸Ni; calculated charge density distribution. ^47,49,53,55Ca, ⁵³K, ⁵⁵Sc; calculated levels, J, π populated in one-neutron removal and addition from and to ⁴⁸Ca and ⁵⁴Ca. ^{37,39,41,43,45,47,49,51,53,55}K; calculated energies of the first excited states. ¹⁶O, ³⁶Ca, ⁵⁶Ni; calculated binding energies. ¹⁸O, ⁵²Ca, ⁶⁴Ni; calculated rms charge radii. ³⁹K, ^49,53Ca; calculated one-nucleon separation energies. ^16,22,24O, ^{36,40,48,52,54,60}Ca, ^48,56,68Ni; calculated binding energy per particle for doubly closed-shell nuclei. State-of-the-art no-core shell model and self-consistent Green's function approaches with NN+3N(lnl) interaction, and with comparisons made with NNLO_sat and NN+3N(400) interactions, and with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.014318