Results:


Dataset #1:

Authors: Huang Xiaolong, Zhou Chunmei   Citation:Nuclear Data Sheets 104, 283 (2005)

Parent
Nucleus
Parent
E(level)
Parent
Parent
T1/2
Decay Mode GS-GS Q-value
(keV)
Daughter
Nucleus
Decay
Scheme
 
ENSDF
file
 
197
80
Hg
 298.938    13/2+   23.8 h 1    IT: 91.4 7      
197
80
Hg
 

Electrons:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



Auger L      7.6       71.4 % 16    0.00543 12 
CE K     50.88 5        14.095 %   0.007171
Auger K     53.8        1.30 % 14    7.0E-4 7 
CE K     81.87 7        20.16 %   0.016504
CE L    119.14 5        32.643 %   0.038891
CE M    130.42 5         8.47 %   0.011047
CE L    150.13 7        50.242 %   0.07543
CE M    161.41 7        15.473 %   0.024975


Gamma and X-ray radiation:

Energy
(keV)
Intensity
(%)
Dose
( MeV/Bq-s )



XR l      9.99      39.3 % 16    0.00393 15 
XR kα2     68.894       9.42 % 21    0.00649 14 
XR kα1     70.818      15.9 % 3    0.01123 22 
XR kβ3     79.824       1.91 % 4    0.00153 3 
XR kβ1     80.225       3.67 % 8    0.00294 6 
XR kβ2     82.473       1.33 % 3    0.001093 23 
   133.98 5       33.5 %   0.0449
   164.97 7        0.262 %   4.32E-4

Gamma Coincidence Data:
For each gamma, the list of gammas in coincidence is given. If experimentally known, an estimate of the average time interval (in seconds) between both gammas is given

E(γ)Coincidence
   133.98164.97 (8.07E-9)
   164.97133.98 (8.07E-9)