• Rapid Communication

Two-neutron knockout as a probe of the composition of states in Mg22,Al23, and Si24

B. Longfellow, A. Gade, J. A. Tostevin, E. C. Simpson, B. A. Brown, A. Magilligan, D. Bazin, P. C. Bender, M. Bowry, B. Elman, E. Lunderberg, D. Rhodes, M. Spieker, D. Weisshaar, and S. J. Williams
Phys. Rev. C 101, 031303(R) – Published 12 March 2020
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Simpson and Tostevin proposed that the width and shape of exclusive parallel momentum distributions of the A2 residue in direct two-nucleon knockout reactions carry a measurable sensitivity to the nucleon single-particle configurations and their couplings within the wave functions of exotic nuclei. We report here on the first benchmarks and use of this new spectroscopic tool. Exclusive parallel momentum distributions for states in the neutron-deficient nuclei Mg22,Al23, and Si24 populated in such direct two-neutron removal reactions were extracted and compared to predictions combining eikonal reaction theory and shell-model calculations. For the well-known Mg22 and Al23 nuclei, measurements and calculations were found to agree, supporting the dependence of the parallel momentum distribution width on the angular momentum composition of the shell-model two-neutron amplitudes. In Si24, a level at 3439(9) keV, of relevance for the important Al23(p,γ)Si24 astrophysical reaction rate, was confirmed to be the 22+ state, whereas the 41+ state, expected to be strongly populated in two-neutron knockout, was not observed. This puzzle is resolved by theoretical considerations of the Thomas-Ehrman shift, which also suggests that a previously reported 3471-keV state in Si24 is, in fact, the (02+) level with one of the largest experimental mirror-energy shifts ever observed.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 12 November 2019
  • Revised 4 January 2020
  • Accepted 26 February 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.031303

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

B. Longfellow1,2, A. Gade1,2, J. A. Tostevin3, E. C. Simpson4, B. A. Brown1,2, A. Magilligan1,2, D. Bazin1,2, P. C. Bender1,*, M. Bowry1,†, B. Elman1,2, E. Lunderberg1,2, D. Rhodes1,2, M. Spieker1,‡, D. Weisshaar1, and S. J. Williams1,§

  • 1National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
  • 4Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physics, The Australian National University, Canberra Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia

  • *Present address: Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, USA.
  • Present address: University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, United Kingdom.
  • Present address: Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA.
  • §Present address: Diamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, United Kingdom.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 3 — March 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×