• Rapid Communication

Almost medium-free measurement of the Hoyle state direct-decay component with a TPC

J. Bishop, G. V. Rogachev, S. Ahn, E. Aboud, M. Barbui, A. Bosh, C. Hunt, H. Jayatissa, E. Koshchiy, R. Malecek, S. T. Marley, E. C. Pollacco, C. D. Pruitt, B. T. Roeder, A. Saastamoinen, L. G. Sobotka, and S. Upadhyayula
Phys. Rev. C 102, 041303(R) – Published 12 October 2020

Abstract

Background: The structure of the Hoyle state, a highly α-clustered state at 7.65 MeV in C12, has long been the subject of debate. Understanding if the system comprises of three weakly interacting α particles in the 0s orbital, known as an α-condensate state, is possible by studying the decay branches of the Hoyle state.

Purpose: The direct decay of the Hoyle state into three α particles, rather than through the Be8 ground state, can be identified by studying the energy partition of the three α particles arising from the decay. This paper provides details on the breakup mechanism of the Hoyle stating using a new experimental technique.

Method: By using β-delayed charged-particle spectroscopy of N12 using the Texas active target time-projection chamber, a high-sensitivity measurement of the direct 3α decay ratio can be performed without contributions from pileup events.

Results: A Bayesian approach to understanding the contribution of the direct components via a likelihood function shows that the direct component is <0.043% at the 95% confidence level. This value is in agreement with several other studies, and, here, we can demonstrate that a small nonsequential component with a decay fraction of about 104 is most likely.

Conclusion: The measurement of the nonsequential component of the Hoyle state decay is performed in an almost medium-free reaction for the first time. The derived upper limit is in agreement with previous studies and demonstrates sensitivity to the absolute branching ratio. Further experimental studies would need to be combined with robust microscopic theoretical understanding of the decay dynamics to provide additional insight into the idea of the Hoyle state as an α condensate.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 14 July 2020
  • Accepted 22 September 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.041303

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

J. Bishop1,2,*, G. V. Rogachev1,2,3, S. Ahn1, E. Aboud1,2, M. Barbui1, A. Bosh1,2, C. Hunt1,2, H. Jayatissa4, E. Koshchiy1, R. Malecek5, S. T. Marley5, E. C. Pollacco6, C. D. Pruitt7, B. T. Roeder1, A. Saastamoinen1, L. G. Sobotka7, and S. Upadhyayula1,2

  • 1Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 3Nuclear Solutions Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 4Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
  • 6IRFU, CEA, Universite Paris-Saclay, Gif-Sur-Ivette, France
  • 7Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA

  • *jackbishop@tamu.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 4 — October 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×