Skip to main content
Log in

Delta-isobar configurations in 12C and 16O nuclei

  • Nuclei
  • Theory
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The differential yield of the reaction 16O(γ, π + p) at the maximum photon energy of 450 MeV was measured in the region of high momentum transfers to the residual nuclear system. The experimental results obtained for the 16O nucleus and the cross section measured earlier for the reaction 12C(γ, π + p) were analyzed on the basis of a model that takes into account the admixture of isobar states in the nuclear wave function. The probabilities for the delta-isobar configurations in the ground states of the carbon and oxygen nuclei per nucleon were estimated empirically at 0.012 ± 0.003 ± 0.002 and 0.019 ± 0.003 ± 0.003, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. M. Green, Rep. Progr. Phys. 39, 1109 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. H. J. Weber and H. Arenhovel, Phys. Rep. 36, 277 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. K. Abdullin, A. V. Blinov, I. A. Vanyushin, et al., Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 51, 774 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. I. Amelin, M. N. Behr, B. A. Chernyshev, et al., Phys. Lett. B 337, 261 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. I. Morris, J. D. Zumbro, J. A. McGill, et al., Phys. Lett. B 419, 25 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. M. Huber, G. J. Lolos, E. J. Brach, et al., Phys. Rev. C 62, 044001 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. A. Pasyuk, R. L. Boudrie, P. A. Gram, et al., Phys. Lett. B 523, 1 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. V.M. Bystritskii, I. V. Glavanakov, P. Grabmaer, et al., JETP Lett. 73, 453 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. R. Anastasio, A. Faessler, H. Müther, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 322, 369 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. N. Ivanov, H. Oberhummer, N. I. Troitskaya, and M. Faber, Eur. Phys. J. A 8, 125 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Frick, S. Kaiser, H. Müther, et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 014309 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Horlacher and H. Arenhövel, Nucl. Phys. A 300, 348 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Strueve, Ch. Hajduk, P. U. Sauer, and W. Theis, Nucl. Phys. A 465, 651 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Picklesimer, R. A. Rice, and R. Brandenburg, Phys. Rev. C 45, 2624 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. N. Tabachenko, Russ. Phys. J. 50, 305 (2007).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. H. J. Lipkin and T.-S. H. Lee, Phys. Lett. B 183, 22 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. K. I. Blomqvist, W. U. Boeglin, R. Böhm, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2396 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. J.M. Laget, PreprintDAPNIA/SPhN95-44 (Saclay, 1995).

  19. V. M. Bystritsky, A. I. Fix, I. V. Glavanakov, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 705, 55 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. I. V. Glavanakov, P. Grabmaer, Yu. F. Krechetov, et al., JETP Lett. 97, 173 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. I. V. Glavanakov and V. N. Stibunov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30, 465 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Liang, D. Branford, T. Davinson, et al., Phys. Lett. B 411, 244 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Branford, J. A. MacKenzie, F. X. Lee, et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 014603 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. I. V. Glavanakov, Yu. F. Krechetov, O. K. Saigushkin, et al., JETP Lett. 81, 432 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. I. V. Glavanakov and A. N. Tabachenko, Nucl. Phys. A 889, 51 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. I. V. Glavanakov and A. N. Tabachenko, Phys. At. Nucl. 75, 1019 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. I. V. Glavanakov and A. N. Tabachenko, Nucl. Phys. A 915, 179 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. I. V. Glavanakov and A. N. Tabachenko, Russ. Phys. J. 55, 153 (2012).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. I. Blomqvist and J.M. Laget, Nucl. Phys. A 280, 405 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. I. V. Glavanakov and A. N. Tabachenko, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Fiz., No. 11(2), 26 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. C. Carrasco, M. J. Vicente Vacas, and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A 570, 701 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. T. Frick, S. Kaiser, H. Müther, et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 034316 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. R. B. Wiringa, R. A. Smith, and T. L. Ainsworth, Phys. Rev. C 29, 1207 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. D. R. Entem, F. Fernández, and A. Valcarce, Phys. Rev. C 62, 034002 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Glavanakov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © I.V. Glavanakov, Yu.F. Krechetov, A.N. Tabachenko, 2014, published in Yadernaya Fizika, 2014, Vol. 77, No. 7, pp. 895–905.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glavanakov, I.V., Krechetov, Y.F. & Tabachenko, A.N. Delta-isobar configurations in 12C and 16O nuclei. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 77, 847–857 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778814060064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778814060064

Keywords

Navigation