Recoil-corrected continuum shell model calculations for 11B(p,n)11C, 11B(p,p)11B*, 12C(e,ex)

Dean Halderson
Phys. Rev. C 88, 014610 – Published 19 July 2013

Abstract

Background: The recoil-corrected continuum shell model provides coupled-channels solutions for bound and unbound wave functions from realistic effective interactions. The wave functions are antisymmetric and contain no spurious components because the calculations are performed in the center-of-mass system.

Purpose: This model has now been extended to include 1ω excitations in the structure of p-shell target (residual) nuclei, hence allowing 0s-shell knockout processes. Several reactions involving the 12C compound system are investigated to demonstrate the utility of the model.

Methods: The states of 11B and 11C are constructed in the nonspurious 0ω plus 1ω model space. An interaction, fitted to Cohen and Kurath (8-16) plus Reid soft core g-matrix elements, is employed. One nucleon is coupled to these states to create a basis for the bound and scattering states for 12C.

Results: Calculated elastic and inelastic cross sections agree well with available data. The calculated transverse response at high momentum transfer is lower than that extracted from data. Although significant, meson exchange currents are not sufficient to give agreement with data. Likewise inclusion of 0s-shell knockout is not sufficient to provide agreement. The high-energy octupole resonance appears at low momentum transfer and an energy of 106/A1/3.

Conclusions: The model should provide meaningful predictions for states near the proton drip line via the (p,n) reaction. Coupled-channels solutions are necessary for describing 12C(e,ex) at low momentum transfer. Lack of strength at low energy and momentum transfer in optical model calculations of 12C(e,ex) is at least partly attributable to the omission of giant resonances. Data for (π+,π+p)/(π,πp) could verify this conclusion. Lack of strength in the transverse response may be attributable to recoil terms which are omitted in most calculations.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
7 More
  • Received 15 November 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.014610

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Dean Halderson

  • Department of Physics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 88, Iss. 1 — July 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×